- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05223296
LigaSure or Diathermy Excision of III-IV Degree Pile
LigaSure or Diathermy Excision of III-IV Degree Pile? A Single-institution Experience: Randomized Control Trials
Abstract:
Introduction:
Pile excision is frequently associated with post-operative pain and prolong hospital stay. A modern technique performed with LigaSure appears to be mainly effective in large pile tissue removal is required. The study compares LigaSure pile excision with diathermy for the treatment of III-IV degree pile.
Patients and Methods:
208 patients with pile III or IV degree randomized into 2 groups. Group one LigaSure and group two diathermy. The study evaluates the mean post-operative time, post-operative pain, discharge date, time return to usual works early and late complication. All patient followed-up for range (12-24) months.
Results:
108patient treated by diathermy, 100 by LigaSure. The mean operative time significantly shorter in LigaSure, post-operative pain disappears earlier in LigaSure than diathermy. The time return to work less in LigaSure, while no difference in hospital stay and post-operative complications.
Conclusions:
LigaSure is effective procedure when large degree III or VI pile excised. The procedure enhances to use LigaSure as treatments of choice for class III-IV pile, even it is more expensive than diathermy operation.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
An Najaf
-
Najaf, An Najaf, Iraq, 00964
- Samer Al-Hakkak
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
III-IV degree pile Prolapsed, irreducible pile
Exclusion Criteria:
I-II degree pile Internal pile
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group I LigaSure (n=100)
100 patients subjected to LigaSure pile excision
|
LigaSure or diathermy excision of III-IV degree pile?
|
|
Active Comparator: Group II Conventional diathermy (n=108)
108 patients subjected to conventional diathermy for grade IV pile excision
|
LigaSure or diathermy excision of III-IV degree pile?
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
postoperative pain,complication, time return to home activity
Time Frame: two years
|
LigaSure better than diathermy in grade II-IV pile excision
|
two years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Adel Al-Mayely, Ph.D., Jabir Ibn Hayyan Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pile
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.