Smartphone App for Cancer Medication Adherence

February 26, 2024 updated by: Melissa K Accordino, Columbia University

Trial of a Smartphone Application to Improve Medication Adherence Among Patients With Cancer

For this current proposal, the investigator will conduct a single-center prospective non-randomized pilot interventional study in patients with any stage and type of cancer who are either taking at least one OACD or are taking at least one oral medication for chronic condition management in conjunction with any cancer treatment.

Primary Objective: To determine the feasibility of using a medication reminder application (Medisafe App) to improve medication adherence in cancer patients either receiving oral anticancer agents (OACDs) or receiving oral medications for chronic disease management (non-OACDs) in conjunction with non-oral cancer treatment.

Secondary Objectives: To compare and characterize medication adherence before and after the 12-week intervention using the Voils Extent of Adherence Scale and the Medisafe App. Also to determine the acceptability, utility and patient engagement with the App, to evaluate changes in healthcare related quality of life before and after the intervention, and to explore behaviors, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs related to medication adherence using a semi-structured interview delivered over the telephone.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many patients with cancer experience frustration with the large number and complex scheduling of their medications. This study will help find out how much "pill burden" exists in patients with cancer, and how a smartphone app can help patients take medications as providers prescribe. Results of this study may help figure out the best way to help patients manage medications in the future.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Melissa Accordino, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any type/stage cancer

  • Patients must be taking either:

    • at least one oral anti-cancer drug (OACD) or
    • at least one oral medication (non-OACD) for management of a chronic condition in addition to receiving non-oral cancer treatment
  • Patients must have access to a mobile phone or tablet that can download the Medisafe App. (ie apple/android)
  • Subjects must be able to complete self-administered questionnaires in English or Spanish.
  • Co-enrollment in trials involving pharmacologic therapy is allowed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Smartphone App Intervention
Cancer patients taking at least one oral anti-cancer drug or oral medication to manage a chronic condition in conjunction with any cancer treatment will receive messages through the Medisafe App.
Other: Smartphone App
Medisafe is a Med_App that is free and has been used in several studies evaluating medication adherence. Patients will receive individualized instruction and be followed for 12 weeks. The researcher will show the patients how to input current medication list, set up medication reminders and track if daily doses have been taken using the App (20 minute training session). After the participant has input their medication information into the app, the researcher will assist the participant in adding an optional "Medifriend" who will be alerted if the participant misses a dose as an option. The participant will also be provided with written instructions about the Medisafe app to take home for reference. At each office visit (4, 8, and 12 weeks) participants will complete a medication checklist and reconciliation form with the research staff. Participants will also be asked to send a medication status report through the Medisafe app.
Other Names:
  • Medisafe App

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects enrolled that complete the 12-week intervention and assessments
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To determine the feasibility of using a medication reminder application (Medisafe App) to improve medication adherence in cancer patients. Feasibility defined as completing the 12-week intervention and the endpoint assessments. Patients will be tallied.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mean score on the Voils Extent of Adherence Scale for oral caner therapy use between baseline and 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
To compare medical adherence to OACDs before and after the 12-week intervention using the Voils Extent of Adherence Scale for OACD use. The Extent of Adherence subscale of the Voils Self-Reported Medication Nonadherence Measurement (Voils Measure) will be used for self-assessment of drug adherence. The Extent of Adherence subscale of the Voils Measure consists of three questions with responses ranging from 1 (perfect adherence) to 5 (highest degree of nonadherence). The Extent score can be calculated in two different ways: the three items in the Extent scale can be averaged, with higher scores representing greater nonadherence, or the scale can be dichotomized, such that perfect adherence is considered "adherent", and any degree of nonadherence is considered "nonadherent."
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in mean score on the Voils Extent of Adherence Scale for global medication use between baseline and 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
To compare medical adherence to OACDs before and after the 12-week intervention using the Voils Extent of Adherence Scale for OACD use. The Extent of Adherence subscale of the Voils Self-Reported Medication Nonadherence Measurement (Voils Measure) will be used for self-assessment of drug adherence. The Extent of Adherence subscale of the Voils Measure consists of three questions with responses ranging from 1 (perfect adherence) to 5 (highest degree of nonadherence). The Extent score can be calculated in two different ways: the three items in the Extent scale can be averaged, with higher scores representing greater nonadherence, or the scale can be dichotomized, such that perfect adherence is considered "adherent", and any degree of nonadherence is considered "nonadherent." For this study, global adherence will be defined as a perfect score (1) for each medication.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Mean Score to Medication Self-Efficacy Scale (MASES) to assess a patient's confidence in their ability to take their medications in a variety of situations
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Medication Self-Efficacy Scale (MASES) is a tool used to assess a patient's confidence in their ability to take their medications in a variety of situations. This is a 25-item scale and items are scored 1= not sure at all, to 4= very sure, and the total scores of the measure is the mean response to all the items (range 1-4).
12 weeks
Mean Score on the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) is a 20-item tool used for classifying and assessing the quality of mobile health apps. It contains four objective quality subscales including engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. Each of the 20-items have an outcome of 1-5; the overall outcome scale ranges from 20-100. It has been developed and validated specifically for end user administration.
12 weeks
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 Score before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 is a well- validated assessment tool that offers both qualitative and quantitative measures of health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29 includes 29 questions evaluating areas of physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, social functioning, and pain interference. The PROMIS-29 assesses severity levels of symptoms and their effect on the patient's functioning.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domain Score before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The 14-item TSQM Version 1.4 is a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients' satisfaction with medication, providing scores on four scales - side effects, effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. We will use the validated abbreviated TSQM-9.24 This questionnaire includes 9-items that address six different domains which include domains of TS-M included; (1) side effects, (2) symptom relief, (3) convenience, (4) effectiveness, (5) impact on daily life, and (6) tolerability/acceptability. Scoring of the TSQM-9 provides a domain score that ranges from 0- 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on each domain.
Baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Columbia University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melissa Accordino, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAS5950

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Smartphone App

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Kosovo

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe