- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05237544
Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) - a Proof of Principle Study Using Anonymised Blood Spots.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. The majority of babies born with SMA become symptomatic as babies (type I) or as toddlers (type II). Type I children will never sit unsupported, require ventilated support in the first year of life and usually die before 2 years of age. Type II children can survive to early adulthood but will never walk. They almost invariably develop severe curvature of the spine, feeding and respiratory insufficiency that require appropriate intervention. Cognitive abilities are not impaired and children are generally bright and sociable.
Several new therapies have recently been developed for children with SMA and have shown remarkable success in clinical trials. One of these therapies, spinraza, has received both FDA and EMA approval and is commercially available in most EU countries and in the US, and is being currently evaluated by NICE. Because of the early onset and rapid progression of infantile SMA, prompt detection of the disease is essential to enable successful treatment. It is now recommended that infants be screened for SMA, enabling early drug treatment thus preventing further neuron damage2. The recently published work on the development of spinraza indeed supports the view that children with shorter disease duration had much better outcome [the 2 NEJM papers] a concept that is also emphasised by the interim analysis of infants who received spinraza presymptomatically as part of an ongoing study sponsored by Biogen (Nurture study). The majority of these children had met the age appropriate milestones by the age of 1 year, a clearly remarkable outcome. Similar very promising results were obtained in a recently published AAV gene therapy study in which a number of the severe infants affected by type 1 SMA achieved even the ability to walk unsupported (Mendell SMA gene therapy NEJM 2017). Also in this manuscript, the children who had a shorter disease duration and those treated shortly after the diagnosis had a much better outcome compared to children treated later. While the findings from this early gene therapy study are currently being extended in a larger global phase 3 study, these dramatic results from emerging therapies have led many countries to include SMA in their respective newborn screening programmes.
A previous study (Adams et al. 2014, J. Clin. Imm) was carried out in an almost identical way to the study planned here. The previous study utilised 5000 anonymised leftover blood spots from a routine NBS lab to test the robustness and practicality of running a NBS assay for SCID. This study was scientifically critiqued leading to publication in a respected relevant scientific journal. The study planned here is identical in the approach (5000 normal leftover blood spots) to test the robustness and practicality of using a commercial assay for NBS for SMA in a routine clinical lab environment. As in the previous SCID study we plan to use a number of retrospective known positive samples as well as all the necessary positive/negative controls contained in the commercial kit. The sole aim of the study is to assess the performance of the commercial kit to provide evidence that NBS screening for SMA could feasibly be carried out in routine NBS screening labs.
The investigators therefore believe this is the correct route to take with SMA Newborn Screening as well. Assays for detection of SMA using the dried blood spots collected for Newborn Screening (NBS) have now been developed. This utilises the amplification of the SMN1 gene and subsequent detection of the deleted section that causes SMA. Newborn blood spot screening to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK, dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA.
The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these anonymised routinely collected dried blood spots. We would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, WC1N 1EH
- Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital. No extra material will be collected and all blood spots will be completely anonymised.
The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen), in order to determine the accuracy of the assay in detecting SMA positives.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- newborn babies
Exclusion Criteria:
- non-newborn
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Other
- Time Perspectives: Other
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
leftover dried blood spot material
All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital.
|
|
anonymous known SMA positive blood spots
The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen),
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Numbers of false negatives.-This is defined as the number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS (Newborn Screening).
|
6 months
|
|
Ease of use of the assay
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Ease of use of the assay in a high-throughput Screening Lab environment.
This is defined as the space for equipment and assay set up.
It also includes hands-on time setting up and analysing the assay.
These are measurable outcomes and will be measured in either dimensions (lab floor/bench space needed) and time (hours) per run.
|
6 months
|
|
Number of failed blood spots samples
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of failed samples.
This is defined as the number of blood spots that fail to PCR amplify with the NBS (Newborn Screening) kit.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assess if the screening assay picks up all known SMA positives
Time Frame: 6 months
|
40 SMA positives to be run
|
6 months
|
|
Assess if there any false positives with the assay
Time Frame: 6 months
|
5000 spots to be run, not expected to be positive
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18NM20
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Muscular Atrophy
-
Marco CapogrossoRoche-GenentechActive, not recruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | SMA | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type II | Spinal Muscular Atrophy 4United States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheActive, not recruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)United States, Spain, Canada, United Kingdom, Croatia, Australia, Netherlands, Japan, Poland, Belgium, Portugal, Italy
-
Institut de Myologie, FranceInstitut RocheCompletedType 2 Spinal Muscular Atrophy | Type 3 Spinal Muscular AtrophyBelgium, France, Germany
-
University Hospital, RouenAgence de La BiomédecineRecruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)France
-
Marco CapogrossoRoche-GenentechCompletedSpinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 4United States
-
BiogenNo longer availableInfantile-onset Spinal Muscular AtrophyNew Zealand, Colombia, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Novartis Gene TherapiesCompletedGene Therapy | SMA - Spinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States
-
Peking University Third HospitalBeihang UniversityCompleted
-
Novartis Gene TherapiesActive, not recruitingSMA | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type II | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type IIIUnited States, Belgium, France, Japan, United Kingdom, Italy, Taiwan, Australia, Canada
-
Charitable Foundation Children with Spinal Muscular...P.V. Voloshyn Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the National...RecruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)Ukraine