Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction for Intellectually Able Autistic Adults

February 21, 2022 updated by: Tatja Hirvikoski, Karolinska Institutet

Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) for Intellectually Able Autistic Adults

This project evaluates mindfulness based stress-reduction (MBSR), adjusted and manualized for intellectually able autistic adults. MBSR is a skills training program based on further development of cognitive behavioral therapy. The program includes eight weekly group training sessions and one full-day retreat, aiming at stress reduction and improved coping in everyday life, as well as improved mental health.

The aspiration is to make ASD-adjusted MBSR an intervention that is acceptable and accessible to individuals with autism in open clinical care. This includes considering variability in background factors such as age, comorbidity and other personal qualities and preferences.

The aim of the studies is to evaluate (1) the feasibility and (2) effectiveness of MBSR in adults (18 or over) with autism without intellectual disability, in an outpatient clinical habilitation context.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mindfulness based stress-reduction (MBSR) is a well-known skills training program used worldwide (Kabat-Zinn, 1982), with studies showing positive effects in many different conditions. The MBSR program aims at increased conscious awareness and reduced subjective stress. The intervention includes one physical meeting per week (three hours) over eight weeks' time plus one mindfulness retreat day (six hours). The intervention also incorporates meditations and other suggested tasks for participants to do by themselves in-between the group sessions. The delivery of this particular version of MBSR is adjusted to meet the needs of autistic adults, without the contents of the original MBSR program curriculum being affected. Areas that were adjusted are e.g. group size, physical environment, communication, structure, and homework.

To ensure high treatment fidelity; the MBSR teachers had teacher training following the international standard, as well as being experienced clinicians working at the habilitation services centers, with extensive knowledge about the target group. All MBSR teachers received supervision and tutoring from highly experienced certified MBSR instructor, in order to ensure that the original MBSR program was followed as closely as possible.

The studies were conducted in a clinical outpatient habilitation health care context and thus constitute an important piece in the development of support for adults with ASD. The program will have an effect on facilitating the planning and implementation of feasible and accessible interventions addressing the complex needs of this target group.

This research project consists of two studies; one open feasibility trial and one randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnose within the autism spectrum according to ICD-10, DSM-IV or DSM-5.
  • Minimum ≥18 years of age.
  • Adequate knowledge of the Swedish language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intellectual disability (IQ≤70).
  • Severe mental illnesses that would hinder participation (e.g. psychosis or acute risk for suicidal behaviors).
  • Drug use in the last three months.
  • Poor mental health as assessed with Montgomary Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in combination with semi-structured interview by a clinical psychologist.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
The 9 session MBSR program following the manual (Kabat-Zinn, 1982).
The 8 week (plus one-day retreat) manualized MBSR program according to the manual (Kabat-Zinn, 1982).
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual (TAU)
Participants take part in their treatment as usual in outpatient habilitation and other services.
Different interventions and support in outpatient and other services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study 1 (feasibility study): Treatment completion.
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention.
Participants attending six or more out of the total nine occasions (eight sessions and one retreat) (≥66%) were considered completers.
Immediately after intervention.
Study 1 (feasibility study): Credibility as measured by the Treatment Credibility Scale (TCS: Borkovec & Nau, 1972).
Time Frame: Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Five statements scored on a ten-point Likert scale where higher points indicate higher treatment credibility.
Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Study 2 (RCT): Perceived stress as measured by the Perceived stress scale (Cohen et al., 1983).
Time Frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
14 statements scored on a five-point Likert-scale (0-4) where higher points indicate higher perceived stress.
Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study 1 (feasibility study): Perceived stress as measured by the Perceived stress scale (Cohen et al., 1983).
Time Frame: Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
14 statements scored on a five-point Likert-scale (0-4) where higher points indicate higher perceived stress.
Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Study 1 (feasibility study): Symptoms of anxiety and depression as measured by Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS: the Swedish Lisspers et al., 1997; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983).
Time Frame: Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
14 statements scored on a four-point Likert scale from "not at all" to "very often", where higher points indicate more anxiety and depressive symptoms. In addition, sub-scales anxiety and depression were analyzed separately.
Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Study 1 (feasibility study): Satisfaction with life as measured by Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS: Diener et al., 1985).
Time Frame: Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Five statements scored on a seven-point Likert-scale (1-7) where higher points indicate more satisfaction with life.
Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Study 1 (feasibility study): Mindfulness, assessed by Mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS: Brown & Ryan, 2003).
Time Frame: Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
15 statements and scored on a six-point Likert-scale (1-6), where higher scores indicate elevated mindful awareness.
Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Study 1 (feasibility study): Acceptance of the Autism diagnosis, assessed by a modified version of the Acceptance and action questionnaire (Bond et al., 2011) for ASD.
Time Frame: Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Seven statements and scored on a seven-point Likert-scale , where higher points indicate less acceptance of the ASD diagnosis.
Baseline compared to immediately after intervention.
Study 2 (RCT): Symptoms of anxiety and depression as measured by Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS: the Swedish Lisspers et al., 1997; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983).
Time Frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
14 statements scored on a four-point Likert scale from "not at all" to "very often", where higher points indicate more anxiety and depressive symptoms. In addition, sub-scales anxiety and depression were analyzed separately.
Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Study 2 (RCT): Life satisfaction as measured by Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS: Diener et al., 1985).
Time Frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Five statements scored on a seven-point (1-7) Likert-scale, where higher points indicate more satisfaction with life.
Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Study 2 (RCT): Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
29 statements scored on a five-point (1-5) Likert-scale (Baer et. al., 2006). Higher points indicate higher mindful awareness.
Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Study 2 (RCT): Acceptance of the autism diagnosis, assessed by a modified version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ: Bond et al., 2011) for ASD.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.
Seven statements scored on a seven-point (1-7) Likert-scale, where higher points indicate less acceptance of the ASD diagnosis.
Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study 1 (feasibility study and RCT): Adverse events and serious adverse events.
Time Frame: At any timepoint during or immediately after the intervention, i.e. not a measure that was assessed for all participants, but reported by any participant that felt he/she had experienced an adverse event.
Events reported by participants that occured during intervention (up to 9 weeks) and may or may not be associated with participation in the intervention.
At any timepoint during or immediately after the intervention, i.e. not a measure that was assessed for all participants, but reported by any participant that felt he/she had experienced an adverse event.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MBSRautisticAdults

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)

Subscribe