Effects of tDCS on People With Fibromyalgia

November 10, 2022 updated by: Narcis Gusi, University of Extremadura

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Brain Electrical Activity, Heart Rate Variability, and Dual-Task Performance in Healthy and Fibromyalgia Women

People with fibromyalgia could experience physical and cognitive impairment as well as higher dual-task cost than healthy people when two tasks are performed simultaneously. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a promising non-pharmacological therapy. However, there is insufficient evidence about the intensities dose-response. Therefore, this protocol aims to 1) to compare the effectiveness and the impact of two tDCS intensities (1mA and 2mA) on cognitive, motor, brain functions, and cardiac autonomic modulation; 2) to study the impact of tDCS on the dual-task performance and creativity after applying tDCS in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. As hypotheses, a reduction of cognitive-motor interference in dual-task performance and also a modification in neurophysiological parameters, and an improvement in cardiac autonomic modulation are expected. Finally, no different effects are obtained depending on the intensity applied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Fibromyalgia is characterized by widespread pain and other associated symptoms, including stiffness, fatigue, non-recovery sleep, anxiety, or depression. On a physical level, people with FM frequently suffer from a sedentary state which reduces cardiovascular fitness and leads to mobility, strength and balance impairments. On a cognitive level, people with FM have often impaired cognitive functions such as memory, attention, processing speed, and executive functions. As a result of all of these symptoms, people with FM have a decreased performance in activities of daily living that are commonly presented as a simultaneous execution of two or more task at the same time (dual-task; DT).

To the knowledge of the investigators, no studies have focused on the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to reduce the interference in DT performance. Furthermore, there are no studies that have studied the effects of different intensities of tDCS on DLPFC in people with FM in DT performance. Similarly, there are no studies that have focused on describing how neurophysiological variables may be modified in people with FM during DT performance. Therefore, it seems interesting to know how tDCS can influence these types of variables in order to improve the quality of life of this population and to open new frontiers for research.

The hypotheses that are proposed for this study are as follows: a) the application of tDCS will improve physical performance in physical variables that will be measured through balance and strength tasks; b) the application of tDCS will improve performance on neurophysiological variables that will be measured through brain electrical activity and HRV; c) the application of tDCS will improve performance in DT conditions as well as in creativity tasks; d) tDCS will have different effects depending on the variability of fibromyalgia symptoms presented (pain, sleep problems and depression); e) no significant effects on the variables would be expected depending on the type of tDCS intensity applied.

At this point, the main objectives of this protocol are: 1) to compare the effectiveness and the impact of two tDCS intensities (1mA and 2mA) on neurophysiological variables, cognitive, and motor functions; 2) to study the impact of tDCS on the dual-task performance and creativity after applying tDCS in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caceres, Spain, 10003
        • Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy and fibromyalgia women living in Caceres (Spain) and the surrounding area

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be able to communicate with the research staff
  • Have read, understood, and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physiatric or neurological disorders
  • Pharmacological treatment for anxiety or depression
  • Substance abuse or dependence
  • Contraindication for physical effort
  • Difficulty in maintaining balance
  • Leg injury that interferes with flexion and extension of the knee
  • Being pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Fibromyalgia
All participants will randomly participate through three tDCS conditions (1mA, 2mA and sham)
Non-invasive technique that modulates the excitability of the cortex by applying low-intensity current
Healthy Controls
All participants will randomly participate through three tDCS conditions (1mA, 2mA and sham)
Non-invasive technique that modulates the excitability of the cortex by applying low-intensity current

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of change in electroencephalography (EEG) between pre and post tDCS session
Time Frame: Once before and after each tDCS session
The Enobio instrument (Neuroelectrics) and Neuroelectrics instrument driver software (NIC1) will be used to record EEG. Theta, alpha and beta power spectrums will be extracted from a 5 minute recording.
Once before and after each tDCS session
Degree of change in heart rate variability (HRV) between pre and post tDCS session
Time Frame: Once before and after each tDCS session
The Enobio instrument (Neuroelectrics) and Neuroelectrics instrument driver software (NIC1) will be used to record HRV. Time domain (SDNN, RMSSD, RR-interval and pNN50), frequency domain (LFnu, HFnu, LF/HF and total power) and non-linear measures (SampEn, SD1 and SD2) will be extracted from a 5 minute recording.
Once before and after each tDCS session
Degree of change in balance between pre and post tDCS session
Time Frame: Once before and after each tDCS session
The tests will be static position with eyes open and static position with eyes closed. The test will be performed on a Kistler force platform.
Once before and after each tDCS session
Degree of change in strength between pre and post tDCS session
Time Frame: Once before and after each tDCS session
The execution of the test consists of performing a concentric contraction of knee flexion and extension six times consecutively and without pause between repetitions at a speed of 60 /s and in a range of movement from 0 to 90 degrees, being 0 full extension and 90 flexion. The test will be performed on the isokinetic dynamometer Multi-Joint 3, Biodex Medical Sistems.
Once before and after each tDCS session
Degree of change in balance, under dual-task condition, between pre and post tDCS session
Time Frame: Once before and after each tDCS session
Participants will simultaneously perform the balance test (static position with eyes open and static position with eyes closed) and a cognitive task. The cognitive task will consist of two-by-two substractions from a number greater than 100.
Once before and after each tDCS session
Degree of change in strenght, under dual-task condition, between pre and post tDCS session
Time Frame: Once before and after each tDCS session
Participants will simultaneously perform the strenght test (conducting a concentric contraction of knee flexion and extension six times consecutively and without pause between repetitions at a speed of 60 /s and in a range of movement from 0 to 90 degrees, being 0 full extension and 90 flexion) and a cognitive task. The cognitive task will consist of two-by-two substractions from a number greater than 100.
Once before and after each tDCS session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Socio-demographic information
Time Frame: At week 1
Age, level of education, injuries, or falls in the last few months, as well as other health related information, will be asked.
At week 1
Physical activity level
Time Frame: At week 1
International Physical activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): results can be reported in categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels or high activity levels) or as a continuous variable (MET minutes a week). MET minutes represent the amount of energy expended carrying out physical activity. Scoring a low level of physical activity on the IPAQ means that you are not meeting any of the criteria for either moderate or high levels of physical activity.
At week 1
Impact of the disease
Time Frame: At week 1
Fibromialgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQ-R): the minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 100, corresponding to the worst overall symptom impact.
At week 1
Fear of falling
Time Frame: At week 1
Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I): the minimum score is 16 and the maximum is 64. The higher the score, the greater the fear of falling.
At week 1
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: At week 1
EuroQol- 5 dimensions- 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) (range 0 to 100 with higher values corresponding to better health status).
At week 1
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: At week 1
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (range 0 to 21, with higher score referring to worse sleep quality).
At week 1
Cognitive Impairment
Time Frame: At week 1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (range 0 to 35 with higher values corresponding to better cognitive function).
At week 1
Degree of change in sensations related to tDCS
Time Frame: Once after the tDCS sessions
Survey of sensations related to tDCS
Once after the tDCS sessions
Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: At week 1
Body composition will be measured with the Tanita BC-418 Body Composition Analyzer
At week 1
Height (meters)
Time Frame: At week 1
Using a SECA 285 model.
At week 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Narcis Gusi, Universidad de Extremadura

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing will be evaluated upon reasonable request by the research group.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

3
Subscribe