Chemical and Mechanical Angioplasty for Vasospasm (SAVEBRAIN) (SAVEBRAIN)

February 20, 2024 updated by: Erasme University Hospital

Comparison of Two Validated Endovascular Strategies for Refractory Vasospastic Stenosis After Non-traumatic Intracranial Haemorrhage Leading to Severe Brain Hypoperfusion: Chemical Versus Chemical and Mechanical Angioplasty

This is a monocentric randomized prospective trial comparing 2 different endovascular strategies of intracranial arterial angioplasty in case of refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis :

  • chemical angioplasty
  • chemical and mechanical angioplasty

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Compare in a randomized prospective trial 2 approved treatments of refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis, chemical angioplasty versus chemical and mechanical angioplasty, using devices already used in clinical practice and CE marked: chemical angioplasty using Nimotop versus chemical and mechanical angioplasty with balloon or adjustable remodeling mesh on brain perfusion evaluated by brain computed tomography (CT) Perfusion

Nowadays, the choice between chemical or chemical and mechanical angioplasty depends on the neurointerventionist for each procedure, no difference in efficiency or safety has been proved and no solid scientific data helps the physician in choosing the correct treatment for each patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussel, Belgium, 1070
        • Erasme Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. Non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ruptured aneurysm, AVM, or per-procedural complication etc)
  3. Ruptured aneurysm, AVM, intracranial arterial perforation or any bleeding lesion secured with surgical clipping or endovascular intervention.
  4. No contra-indication to both CTP and MRI imaging
  5. Subject or legal representative is able and willing to give informed consent.
  6. Refractory of intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis requiring an endovascular angioplasty with a severe stenosis defined on CTA or DSA; and/or a significant hypoperfusion defined according to the mismatch profile in stroke or a MTT>6 seconds. The volume of critically hypoperfused tissue will be based on a time to maximum of the tissue residue function (Tmax) threshold of >6 sec using the Rapid (or equivalent) software.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Angioplasty by one of the two methods considered as impossible or too risky by the neurointerventionist
  2. Inability to obtain consent from patient or patients relatives
  3. Pregnant women
  4. Less than 18 years of age
  5. Need to use any other device
  6. Vertebro-basilar arteries will not be randomized because of the difficulty to assess the perfusion volume in this territory, but will be treated if necessary according to our local protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Chemical angioplasty
Chemical angioplasty using intra-arterial Nimodipin
Angioplasty for Refractory Intracranial Arterial Vasospastic Stenosis
Active Comparator: Chemical and Mechanical angioplasty
Balloon angioplasty for refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis with a CE Marked device (Neurospeed balloon) or Adjustable remodeling mesh angioplasty for refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis with a CE Marked device (Comaneci) in association with intra-arterial Nimodipin
Angioplasty for Refractory Intracranial Arterial Vasospastic Stenosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in brain hypoperfusion
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Brain hypoperfusion in arterial territories assessed by the delays on perfusion Time to drain (seconds) on CT and/or MR perfusion
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in vessel size
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Change in the vessel size measured on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography angiogram (CTA) in millimeters
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Time to next endovascular intervention for vasospastic stenosis
Time Frame: Number of days after the endovascular procedure until the next procedure in days, up to 4 weeks
Delay between two procedures for the same indication
Number of days after the endovascular procedure until the next procedure in days, up to 4 weeks
modified Rankin Scale at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after Intracranial Hemorrhage
clinical evolutionclinical evolution (mRS between 0 and 6, a higher score means a worse outcome)
3 months after Intracranial Hemorrhage
Change in Transcranial Doppler
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Change in intracranial vasospasm assessed by the targeted vessel velocity in meters per second
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
change in Brain Hypoperfusion 2
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Reduction in brain hypoperfusion assessed by the volumes on different perfusion parameters time to peak (in seconds) on CT and/or MR perfusion
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
change in Glasgow coma scale
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Glasgow coma scale (GCS between 3 and 15, a higher score means a better outcome)
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS between 0 and 42, a higher score means a worse outcome)
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Change in the monitoring of tissue oxygen pressure (PtiO2)
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Monitoring of tissue oxygen pressure (PtiO2)
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Number of new ischemic lesions
Time Frame: Change between day 0, 5, 9, 21 after Intracranial Hemorrhage
Number of new ischemic lesions on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan
Change between day 0, 5, 9, 21 after Intracranial Hemorrhage
Change in brain hypoperfusion 3
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Brain hypoperfusion in arterial territories assessed by the delays on perfusion parameters TMax maps in seconds on CT and/or MR perfusion
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Change in brain hypoperfusion 4
Time Frame: Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Brain hypoperfusion in arterial territories assessed by the delays on perfusion parameters Mean transit time on CT and/or MR perfusion in seconds
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adrien Guenego, MD, Erasme Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arteriovenous Fistula

Clinical Trials on Chemical and Mechanical Angioplasty for Refractory Intracranial Arterial Vasospastic Stenosis

  • University College, London
    Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain & Ireland; British Congenital...
    Unknown
    Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
    United Kingdom
Subscribe