The POUR (Postoperative Urinary Retention) Study (POUR)

June 18, 2025 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

The POUR Study: Effects of Neuromuscular Reversal Agents on Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR) Following Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

The primary aim of this study will be to compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention between patients receiving Sugammadex and those receiving traditional reversal agents

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Postoperative urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair occurs in approximately one out of ten patients. The more rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade with Sugammadex has empirically been associated with low rates of postoperative urinary retention. In this study, patients will receive Sugammadex following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and then be retrospectively matched against a group of patients who did not receive Sugammadex. The primary aim of this study will be to compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention between patients receiving Sugammadex and those receiving traditional reversal agents (e.g. neostigmine which has a retention rate of 5-11%). We will also examine difference in cost and quality of life between the two groups. Our hypothesis is that the use of Sugammadex will decrease rate of postoperative urinary retention, decrease associated cost, such as need for admission, and not negatively impact quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Carolinas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over the age of 18
  • Undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at Carolinas Medical Center by attending surgeons within the Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair; may have concurrent umbilical hernia repair performed
  • Agreeable to participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are having concurrent ventral or flank hernias repaired at time of operation or are having an inguinal hernia repair along with another operation (e.g.

laparoscopic cholecystectomy)

  • End-stage renal disease (Creatinine clearance less than 30)
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Prior adverse reactions to Sugammadex
  • Patients who do not provide consent for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sugammadex
Prospective cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will receive Sugammadex. Sugammadex will be used for reversal of their neuromuscular blockade. The dosing for Sugammadex is 4mg/kg for a deep reversal and a 2mg/kg for a standard reversal, which will be more common for this study. Sugammadex comes in 200mg/2mL and 500mg/5mL vials. Because of the variability in weight of the patients and the type of reversal needed (deep vs standard), 140 5mL vials will be required.
The dosing for Sugammadex is 4mg/kg for a deep reversal and a 2mg/kg for a standard reversal, which will be more common for this study. Sugammadex comes in 200mg/2mL and 500mg/5mL vials. Because of the variability in weight of the patients and the type of reversal needed (deep vs standard), 140 5mL vials will be required.
No Intervention: Retrospective cohort
Retrospective cohort of patients who did not receive Sugammadex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Urinary Retention
Time Frame: 6 hours postop
Urinary retention is defined as the inability to void at six hours postoperatively, which will be recorded in the postoperative recovery area and the same definition for urinary retention will be applied to the comparative retrospective cohort
6 hours postop

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Cost
Time Frame: At discharge (up to 365 days)
Patient costs associated with procedure and hospital stay
At discharge (up to 365 days)
Length of Stay (Days)
Time Frame: From post op to discharge (up to 365 days)
Patients will be followed from post surgery until discharge to determine the interim time
From post op to discharge (up to 365 days)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Survey
Time Frame: Week 2
Quality of life survey given post hernia repair to evaluate mesh sensation, pain and movement limitations. 23 total items. Each item is scored 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (disabling symptoms). Total score range is 0-115 with a low score indicating surgery had no negative impact on quality of life.
Week 2
Operation Time
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of minutes the operation lasted
Day 1
Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Time Frame: Day 1
Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) represents the potency of an opioid dose relative to morphine. MME is intended to help clinicians make safe, appropriate decisions concerning changes to opioid regimens.
Day 1
Number of Participants With Clean Wounds at Follow Up
Time Frame: Up to Week 2
Number of participants with clean wounds based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wound guidelines. CDC wound classification options are Clean, Clean-Contaminated, Contaminated, and Dirty/Infected.
Up to Week 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brant T Heniford, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Urinary Retention

Clinical Trials on Sugammadex

Subscribe