- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05281302
Combination of Neck Muscle Vibration and tDCS With Conventional Rehabilitation in Neglect Patients (HEMISTIM)
Innovative Therapy Combining Neck Muscle Vibration and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Association With Conventional Rehabilitation in Left Unilateral Spatial Neglect Patients: HEMISTIM Protocol
BACKGROUND: Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) rehabilitation remains a challenge and requires the development of new methods that can be easily integrated into conventional practice. The aim of the HEMISTIM protocol is to assess immediate and long-term functional outcomes and neuropsychological aspects of recovery, induced by an innovative association of left-side neck-muscle vibration (NMV) and anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the ipsilesional posterior parietal cortex during occupational therapy sessions in patients with left USN.
METHODS: Participants will be randomly assigned to 4 groups: control, Left-NMV, Left-NMV + sham-tDCS or Left-NMV + anodal-tDCS. NMV will be applied during the first 15 minutes of occupational therapy and tDCS will be applied for 20 minutes, starting 5 minutes before, three days a week for three weeks. USN will be assessed at baseline, just at the end of the first experimental session, after the first and third weeks of the protocol and three weeks after its ending.
DISCUSSION: Left NMV, by activating multisensory integration neuronal networks, might enhance beneficial effects obtained by conventional occupational therapy sessions since interesting post-effects were shown when it was combined with voluntary upper limb movements. The investigators expect to reinforce lasting intermodal recalibration through LTP-like plasticity induced by anodal tDCS. The HEMISTIM protocol represents a therapeutic innovation associated to conventional practice that could provide a partial solution to the rehabilitation challenges of the USN syndrome and some insights to its underlying mechanisms.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- admitted in a post-stroke rehabilitation unit in the sub-acute phase (15 days to 6 months from the onset of stroke symptoms)
- at least 18 years old
- a first unilateral right hemispheric stroke
- diagnosis of stroke confirmed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Behavioral Inattention Test (c-BIT), inferior or equal to 129
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to give informed consent
- pregnant women
- patients with skin lesions on the areas for electrode placement
- having history of metal-in-cranial injury
- epilepsy
- vestibulo-cochlear illness
- cardiac pacemaker
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control patients
Patient receiving no additional treatment to conventional occupational therapy sessions
|
|
|
Experimental: left-NMV
Patient will be equipped with vibratory stimulators during conventional occupational therapy sessions. Only the left-side NMV vibrator will be activated. |
Patient will receive neck muscle vibration during the first 15 minutes of occupational therapy.
Vibratory stimulators will be fixed bilaterally on the skin over the belly of the trapezius muscles and fastened with straps.
Only the left vibrator will be activated.
|
|
Sham Comparator: left-NMV + sham-tDCS
Patient will be equipped with vibratory stimulators and with electrodes form sham-tDCS during conventional occupational therapy sessions. Only the left-side NMV vibrator will be activated. |
Patient will receive neck muscle vibration during the first 15 minutes of occupational therapy.. Vibratory stimulators will be fixed bilaterally on the skin over the belly of the trapezius muscles and fastened with straps. Only the left vibrator will be activated. Moreover, tDCS will be applied using an electrical stimulator (DC-STIMULATOR®, NeuroCare, Illmenau, Germany) through large saline-soaked sponge surface electrodes placed as follows: anode over the right (ipsilesional) posterior parietal cortex (P4 according to the International 10-20 EEG electrode placement system) and cathode over the left supraorbital region. The tDCS will be automatically turned off after 20 seconds. This allows the reproduction of the initial mild itching sensation at the beginning of active tDCS, thus ensuring that the patient stays blind to the activation status of the device. |
|
Experimental: left-NMV + anodal-tDCS
Patient will be equipped with vibratory stimulators and with electrodes for tDCS during conventional occupational therapy sessions. Only the left-side NMV vibrator will be activated. |
Patient will receive neck muscle vibration during the first 15 minutes of occupational therapy. Vibratory stimulators will be fixed bilaterally on the skin over the belly of the trapezius muscles and fastened with straps. Only the left vibrator will be activated. Moreover, tDCS will be applied using an electrical stimulator (DC-STIMULATOR®, NeuroCare, Illmenau, Germany) through large saline-soaked sponge surface electrodes placed as follows: anode over the right (ipsilesional) posterior parietal cortex (P4 according to the International 10-20 EEG electrode placement system) and cathode over the left supraorbital region. A continuous 2 mA current will be delivered for 20 minutes simultaneously to NMV stimulation. The stimulation will begin 5 minutes before the beginning of occupational therapy. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: at the end of the first week of inclusion
|
Functional scale assessing unilateral spatial neglect severity in daily life situations.
This is a score on 30.
The higher the score, the severe the unilateral spatial neglect
|
at the end of the first week of inclusion
|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
Functional scale assessing unilateral spatial neglect severity in daily life situations.
This is a score on 30.
The higher the score, the severe the unilateral spatial neglect
|
Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: after the first week of protocol
|
Functional scale assessing unilateral spatial neglect severity in daily life situations.
This is a score on 30.
The higher the score, the severe the unilateral spatial neglect
|
after the first week of protocol
|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: after the third week of protocol
|
Functional scale assessing unilateral spatial neglect severity in daily life situations.
This is a score on 30.
The higher the score, the severe the unilateral spatial neglect
|
after the third week of protocol
|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Functional scale assessing unilateral spatial neglect severity in daily life situations.
This is a score on 30.
The higher the score, the severe the unilateral spatial neglect
|
3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fluff test
Time Frame: at the end of the first week of inclusion
|
Investigating personal neglect with targets sticked on patients' clothes.
The number of targets removed targets will be counted in order to calculate a score of personal neglect expressed as the difference of percentages of targets found on each side of the body (left-right), this value becoming more negative with the severity of personal neglect.
|
at the end of the first week of inclusion
|
|
Fluff test
Time Frame: Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
Investigating personal neglect with targets sticked on patients' clothes.
The number of targets removed targets will be counted in order to calculate a score of personal neglect expressed as the difference of percentages of targets found on each side of the body (left-right), this value becoming more negative with the severity of personal neglect.
|
Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
|
Fluff test
Time Frame: after the first week of protocol
|
Investigating personal neglect with targets sticked on patients' clothes.
The number of targets removed targets will be counted in order to calculate a score of personal neglect expressed as the difference of percentages of targets found on each side of the body (left-right), this value becoming more negative with the severity of personal neglect.
|
after the first week of protocol
|
|
Fluff test
Time Frame: after the third week of protocol
|
Investigating personal neglect with targets sticked on patients' clothes.
The number of targets removed targets will be counted in order to calculate a score of personal neglect expressed as the difference of percentages of targets found on each side of the body (left-right), this value becoming more negative with the severity of personal neglect.
|
after the third week of protocol
|
|
Fluff test
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Investigating personal neglect with targets sticked on patients' clothes.
The number of targets removed targets will be counted in order to calculate a score of personal neglect expressed as the difference of percentages of targets found on each side of the body (left-right), this value becoming more negative with the severity of personal neglect.
|
3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
|
Gainotti's drawing copying test
Time Frame: at the end of the first week of inclusion
|
Informs us on two kinds of peri-personal neglect referring to distinct disturbances of involved mental representations involved : space-centered neglect (egocentric) and object-centered neglect (allocentric).
|
at the end of the first week of inclusion
|
|
Gainotti's drawing copying test
Time Frame: Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
Informs us on two kinds of peri-personal neglect referring to distinct disturbances of involved mental representations involved : space-centered neglect (egocentric) and object-centered neglect (allocentric).
|
Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
|
Gainotti's drawing copying test
Time Frame: after the first week of protocol
|
Informs us on two kinds of peri-personal neglect referring to distinct disturbances of involved mental representations involved : space-centered neglect (egocentric) and object-centered neglect (allocentric).
|
after the first week of protocol
|
|
Gainotti's drawing copying test
Time Frame: After the third week of protocol
|
Informs us on two kinds of peri-personal neglect referring to distinct disturbances of involved mental representations involved : space-centered neglect (egocentric) and object-centered neglect (allocentric).
|
After the third week of protocol
|
|
Gainotti's drawing copying test
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Informs us on two kinds of peri-personal neglect referring to distinct disturbances of involved mental representations involved : space-centered neglect (egocentric) and object-centered neglect (allocentric).
|
3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
|
The Map of France test
Time Frame: Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
The number of cities mentioned will be counted on either side of a median line drawn vertically through the center of France.
A mental evocation score will be calculated as the ratio of the number of cities on each side of this axis (left/right).
The higher the score, the better the performance.
|
Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
|
The Map of France test
Time Frame: After the first experimental session
|
The number of cities mentioned will be counted on either side of a median line drawn vertically through the center of France.
A mental evocation score will be calculated as the ratio of the number of cities on each side of this axis (left/right).
The higher the score, the better the performance.
|
After the first experimental session
|
|
The Map of France test
Time Frame: After the first week of protocol
|
The number of cities mentioned will be counted on either side of a median line drawn vertically through the center of France.
A mental evocation score will be calculated as the ratio of the number of cities on each side of this axis (left/right).
The higher the score, the better the performance.
|
After the first week of protocol
|
|
The Map of France test
Time Frame: After the third week of protocol
|
The number of cities mentioned will be counted on either side of a median line drawn vertically through the center of France.
A mental evocation score will be calculated as the ratio of the number of cities on each side of this axis (left/right).
The higher the score, the better the performance.
|
After the third week of protocol
|
|
The Map of France test
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
The number of cities mentioned will be counted on either side of a median line drawn vertically through the center of France.
A mental evocation score will be calculated as the ratio of the number of cities on each side of this axis (left/right).
The higher the score, the better the performance.
|
3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
|
The Subjective Straight-Ahead test
Time Frame: At the end of the first week of inclusion
|
Its investigates the accuracy of egocentric perception.
EThe egocentric perception will be expressed as the mean error of 20 successive trials, after measuring for each trial the angular difference between the measured angles of the hand pointed towards SSA direction and the objective straight-ahead direction of the patient's body.
A higher score indicates a less accurate egocentric perception.
|
At the end of the first week of inclusion
|
|
The Subjective Straight-Ahead test
Time Frame: Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
Its investigates the accuracy of egocentric perception.
EThe egocentric perception will be expressed as the mean error of 20 successive trials, after measuring for each trial the angular difference between the measured angles of the hand pointed towards SSA direction and the objective straight-ahead direction of the patient's body.
A higher score indicates a less accurate egocentric perception.
|
Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
|
The Subjective Straight-Ahead test
Time Frame: After the first week of protocol
|
Its investigates the accuracy of egocentric perception.
EThe egocentric perception will be expressed as the mean error of 20 successive trials, after measuring for each trial the angular difference between the measured angles of the hand pointed towards SSA direction and the objective straight-ahead direction of the patient's body.
A higher score indicates a less accurate egocentric perception.
|
After the first week of protocol
|
|
The Subjective Straight-Ahead test
Time Frame: After the third week of protocol
|
Its investigates the accuracy of egocentric perception.
EThe egocentric perception will be expressed as the mean error of 20 successive trials, after measuring for each trial the angular difference between the measured angles of the hand pointed towards SSA direction and the objective straight-ahead direction of the patient's body.
A higher score indicates a less accurate egocentric perception.
|
After the third week of protocol
|
|
The Subjective Straight-Ahead test
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Its investigates the accuracy of egocentric perception.
EThe egocentric perception will be expressed as the mean error of 20 successive trials, after measuring for each trial the angular difference between the measured angles of the hand pointed towards SSA direction and the objective straight-ahead direction of the patient's body.
A higher score indicates a less accurate egocentric perception.
|
3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
|
The Wheelchair navigation test
Time Frame: At the end of the first week of inclusion
|
Investigating spatial navigation skills and extra-personal neglect.
The ride will be carried out once in each direction (A-B and B-A) to balance the number of obstacles and turns to the left and right.
The time taken to finish the course will be measured and the number of bumps counted.
Navigation quality will also be observed qualitatively (obstacle avoidance, goal strategy, perseverations).
|
At the end of the first week of inclusion
|
|
The Wheelchair navigation test
Time Frame: Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
Investigating spatial navigation skills and extra-personal neglect.
The ride will be carried out once in each direction (A-B and B-A) to balance the number of obstacles and turns to the left and right.
The time taken to finish the course will be measured and the number of bumps counted.
Navigation quality will also be observed qualitatively (obstacle avoidance, goal strategy, perseverations).
|
Immediately following first session of occupational therapy.
|
|
The Wheelchair navigation test
Time Frame: After the first week of protocol
|
Investigating spatial navigation skills and extra-personal neglect.
The ride will be carried out once in each direction (A-B and B-A) to balance the number of obstacles and turns to the left and right.
The time taken to finish the course will be measured and the number of bumps counted.
Navigation quality will also be observed qualitatively (obstacle avoidance, goal strategy, perseverations).
|
After the first week of protocol
|
|
The Wheelchair navigation test
Time Frame: After the third week of protocol
|
Investigating spatial navigation skills and extra-personal neglect.
The ride will be carried out once in each direction (A-B and B-A) to balance the number of obstacles and turns to the left and right.
The time taken to finish the course will be measured and the number of bumps counted.
Navigation quality will also be observed qualitatively (obstacle avoidance, goal strategy, perseverations).
|
After the third week of protocol
|
|
The Wheelchair navigation test
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Investigating spatial navigation skills and extra-personal neglect.
The ride will be carried out once in each direction (A-B and B-A) to balance the number of obstacles and turns to the left and right.
The time taken to finish the course will be measured and the number of bumps counted.
Navigation quality will also be observed qualitatively (obstacle avoidance, goal strategy, perseverations).
|
3 weeks after the last session of intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Hadrien Ceyte, PhD, HDR, Université de Lorraine, DevAH (EA3450), Nancy, France
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRR-LSC-2021-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Unilateral Spatial Neglect
-
University of Geneva, SwitzerlandRecruitingUnilateral Spatial NeglectSwitzerland
-
Kessler FoundationEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingSensory Neglect | Spatial Neglect | Hemispatial Neglect | Hemineglect | Unilateral Neglect | Visual Spatial NeglectUnited States
-
Hospices Civils de LyonSuspendedBrain Lesion of the Right Hemisphere | Unilateral Spatial Neglect for Half of ThemFrance
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.TerminatedUnilateral Spatial NeglectUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedUnilateral Spatial Neglect (USN)United States
-
Hopitaux de Saint-MauriceRecruitingStroke | Unilateral Spatial NeglectFrance
-
Federal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and...RecruitingUnilateral Spatial Neglect (USN)Russian Federation
-
Kettering Health NetworkRecruitingStroke | Unilateral Spatial NeglectUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di PisaNot yet recruitingStroke | Brain Injured Patients | Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment | Neglect | Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN)Italy
-
University of SalamancaRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Neck muscle vibration
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedVestibular Diseases | Cervical Pain | Somatosensory Disorders
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneRecruitingHealthy Volunteer Study | Vibration Therapy | HypoactivityFrance
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedStroke, SubacutePakistan
-
Nachum Soroker, MDTel Aviv UniversityWithdrawn
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedVibratory Stimuli, A Novel Rehabilitation Method for Preventing Post - Traumatic Knee OsteoarthritisKnee OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedDiabetic Neuropathies | Peripheral NeuropathyPakistan
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusActive, not recruitingPrimary Cervical DystoniaItaly
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedSarcopenia | OsteoporosisBelgium
-
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansWithdrawn