Clinic-based Versus Hotspot-focused Active TB Case Finding (CHASE-TB)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Clinic Versus Hotspot Active Case Finding and Linkage to Preventive Therapy (ACF/TPT) Strategy Evaluation for TB: A Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial

This five-year study will evaluate two strategies for conducting tuberculosis (TB) active case finding (ACF) and linkage to TB treatment or TB preventive therapy (TPT) in peri-urban Uganda. The two strategies differ in the location where ACF activities are performed: A "facility-based" ACF/TPT strategy will perform ACF, plus linkage to TPT, in the immediate vicinity of a large public health facility and will primarily recruit individuals who are attending the health facility, irrespective of TB suspicion or symptoms. Alternatively, a "hotspot-based" strategy will use routine notification data and local expertise to identify local TB hotspots - defined as the geographic areas though to have the highest burden of undiagnosed TB per estimated population. The same infrastructure (personnel, equipment, supplies, etc.) for ACF/TPT will then be placed in those zones for a period of four months at a time, and the general population will be recruited for screening and linkage to TPT.

The two interventions will be compared in a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial with a cluster-randomized, multiple-period crossover design. The study will evaluate whether hotspot-focused ACF/TPT results in a greater number of TB patients diagnosed and linked to care, and a greater number of individuals started on preventive therapy, than facility-based ACF/TPT. Secondarily, it will also compare the two interventions in terms of number of people initiated on TPT, and it will compare TB cases detected in regions performing ACF/TPT (either approach) against cases detected in regions that continue to perform the standard of care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Recruiting
        • Walimu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Achilles Katamba, MBChB PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥15 years, OR age 5-14 and a close contact of someone diagnosed with TB,
  • Provision of oral informed consent, or, if age <18 years and not legally emancipated, oral informed assent (if ages 8-17) and parental informed consent (ages 5-17) to participate in the study
  • Ability to communicate with study staff in English or Luganda, or availability of a capable interpreter who is acceptable to the participant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On treatment for, or diagnosed with but not yet treated for, active TB

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No intervention
Experimental: Hotspot-focused ACF/TPT
ACF/TPT intervention will be delivered in a community setting, in geographic areas judged likely to have a high burden of undiagnosed TB
ACF/TPT in both intervention arms will consist of TB screening by mobile chest X-ray (with artificial intelligence-based reading, followed by confirmatory sputum testing with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for participants with abnormal x-rays), and linkage to preventive therapy for those who are TB-negative and eligible for TPT (limited in April 2024 to those with close TB contact or known HIV infection).
Experimental: Facility-based ACF/TPT
ACF/TPT intervention will be delivered on the grounds of a health facility (hospital or large public health center)
ACF/TPT in both intervention arms will consist of TB screening by mobile chest X-ray (with artificial intelligence-based reading, followed by confirmatory sputum testing with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for participants with abnormal x-rays), and linkage to preventive therapy for those who are TB-negative and eligible for TPT (limited in April 2024 to those with close TB contact or known HIV infection).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed TB notifications, hotspot vs facility
Time Frame: From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Number of study region residents notified as initiating treatment for bacteriologically confirmed new or relapsed pulmonary TB, comparing periods in which regions performed hotspot-focused ACF/TPT to those in which facility-based ACF/TPT was performed.
From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TPT initiations, hotspot vs facility
Time Frame: From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Number of study region residents initiating TPT during intervention periods, comparing periods in which regions performed hotspot-focused ACF/TPT to those in which facility-based ACF/TPT was performed.
From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed TB notifications, ACF/TPT vs control
Time Frame: 48 months from start of interventions in each "triplet" of clusters
Number of study region residents notified as initiating treatment for bacteriologically confirmed new or relapsed pulmonary TB, comparing intervention regions to control regions.
48 months from start of interventions in each "triplet" of clusters
Study-initiated TB notifications, hotspot vs facility
Time Frame: From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Number of people diagnosed with TB through study participation and initiating treatment for TB, hotspot-focused and facility-based ACF/TPT.
From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Number screened by study
Time Frame: During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Total number of people screened for TB with each intervention.
During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Number diagnosed by study
Time Frame: During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Number of study participants found to have Xpert-positive sputum.
During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Cost effectiveness (hotspot vs facility) as assessed by cost per disability-adjusted life year averted
Time Frame: From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, comparing the more to the less effective ACF/TPT intervention (if an effectiveness difference is found).
From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Cost effectiveness (ACF/TPT vs no intervention) as assessed by cost per disability-adjusted life year averted
Time Frame: From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, comparing ACF/TPT to no ACF/TPT.
From the start to two weeks after the end of each four-month intervention period
Number evaluated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) with tuberculin skin testing (TST)
Time Frame: During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Total number of people completing TST placement and reading by the study
During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Number referred for TPT
Time Frame: During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Number of participants referred for TB preventive therapy based on TST result or other eligibility criteria
During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Contacts screened
Time Frame: During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
Number of people screened for TB who are identified as contacts of a person diagnosed with TB through the study
During four-month intervention periods (6 periods per cluster over 48 months)
TB notification trend (intervention vs control)
Time Frame: Approximately 38 to 46 months per cluster (5 to 6 four-month intervention periods, plus intervening washout periods)
Trend in TB notification rate over the span of study intervention involvement, comparing intervention clusters to control clusters
Approximately 38 to 46 months per cluster (5 to 6 four-month intervention periods, plus intervening washout periods)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emily Kendall, MD PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data that underlie results in publications

IPD Sharing Time Frame

deposited at the time of publication and available indefinitely

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

will be deposited into a controlled access data repository and made available for approved noncommercial research

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Subscribe