Respiratory Functions and Muscle Strength, Trunk Control, Functional Capacity and Independence in Hemiplegic Patients

August 13, 2025 updated by: Seda Saka, Halic University

The Relationship of Respiratory Functions and Respiratory Muscle Strength With Trunk Control, Functional Capacity and Functional Independence in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke

The aim of this study was to invastigate the relationship between respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength with trunk control, functional capacity and functional independence in hemiplegic patients after stroke. In our study, 25 hemiplegic patients were included on a voluntary basis. Pulmonary function test (PFT) for respiratory functions, mouth pressure measurement (MIP: maximal ınspiratory pressure, MEP: maximal expiratory pressure) for respiratory muscle strenght. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for trunk control, and Time Up and Go Test (TUG) for functional capacity and Barthel Index (BI) for functional independence assessment were used.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Stroke is a clinical picture where motor loss, emotional and balance disororder, speech and cognitive functions are seen as a obstruction or rupture of cerebral vessels. %10 of patients with stroke recover spontaneously within the first month: the other %10 do not respond treatment. %80 of patients need rehabilitation. The purpose of stroke rehabilitation is to provide individuals with the functional capacity and functional indepence they need in the shortest time. The aim of this study was to invastigate the relationship between respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength with trunk control, functional capacity and functional independence in hemiplegic patients after stroke. In our study, 25 hemiplegic patients were included on a voluntary basis. Pulmonary function test (PFT) for respiratory functions, mouth pressure measurement (MIP: maximal ınspiratory pressure, MEP: maximal expiratory pressure) for respiratory muscle strenght. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) for trunk control, and Time Up and Go Test (TUG) for functional capacity and Barthel Index (BI) for functional independence assessment were used.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34350
        • Seda Saka

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

It was performed in Aydın University Health Practice and Research Center Physical Therapy Unit.

When the literature is examined, it is reported that there are moderate correlations (r=0.578) between trunk control and respiratory muscle strength evaluation results. Based on this, it was calculated that the sample size should be 23 cases in order to have a medium level correlation (r=0.550) target, 80% power and 95% confidence level for our study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of ischemic stroke
  • over age 40 years
  • Brunnstrom stage 3-6.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having an additional clinical problem affecting lung functions,
  • Mini-mental test score below 24,
  • having another cardiovascular disease except stroke.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trunk Impairment Scale
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Trunk control was assessed with Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) that was developed to evaluate trunk control in patients with neurological problems consists of 17 parameters. The parameters are scored between 0 and 3 in the scale in which static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination are evaluated. The best performance value was recorded after three repeated measurements in patients who could maintain their starting position
at the enrollment
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Functional capacity of subjects were evaluated with Time Up and Go Test (TUG). TUG is widely used to evaluate functional capacity in stroke patients. Test procedure was given to the patients before the test. During the test, the subject was asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters forward, turn 180 degrees where they were, walk back to the chair and sit on the chair again. Test time was measured with a stopwatch and recorded. Subjects performed the test three times with intervals and the best result was recorded
at the enrollment
Barthel Index
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Functional independence was evaluated with Barthel Index (BI) which is one of the most frequently used scales for determining and tracking functional independence. It basically evaluates mobility and self-care activities. The test consists of 10 sections: nutrition, transfer, self-care, toilet use, bathroom, movement, use of wheelchairs (if using), climbing up and down stairs, dressing, bowel and bladder control (26, 27). The total score is evaluated between 0-100; 0-20 points: fully dependent, 21-61 points: highly dependent, 62-90 points: moderately dependent, 91-99 points: slightly dependent, 100 points: fully independent
at the enrollment
FEV1 (liter)
Time Frame: at the enrollment
This is the amount of air with pulmonary function test that the patient can force out of their lungs in one second.
at the enrollment
FEV1 (%-percentage)
Time Frame: at the enrollment
This is the percentage of air with pulmonary function test that the patient can force out of their lungs in one second.
at the enrollment
FVC (liter)
Time Frame: at the enrollment
This is the greatest total amount of air patient can forcefully breathe out after breathing in as deeply as possible.
at the enrollment
FVC (%-percentage)
Time Frame: at the enrollment
This is the percentage of total amount of air patient can forcefully breathe out after breathing in as deeply as possible.
at the enrollment
FEV1/FVC (percentage)
Time Frame: at the enrollment
The FEV1/FVC ratio is a number that represents the percentage of patient lung capacity patient is able to exhale in one second.
at the enrollment
Inspiratory muscle test
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is going to measured using a mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; MicroMedical, UK) according to the guideline of ATS and European Respiratory Society (ERS).
at the enrollment
Expiratory muscle test
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) is going to measured using a mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; MicroMedical, UK) according to the guideline of ATS and European Respiratory Society (ERS).
at the enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Seda Saka, PT, PhD, Haliç Üniversitesi: Halic Universitesi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on clinical assessment

Subscribe