Validation of the REMINDER Dementia Risk Reduction Program (REMINDER)

May 7, 2024 updated by: Ana Rita Silva, University of Coimbra

Validation of a Multidomain Neuropsychological Intervention for Individuals at Risk of Dementia: the REMINDER Program

Until now, neuropsychological interventions aimed to optimize cognitive function and to have functional impact in individuals at risk of AD (MCI patients) were scarce in validity studies. While some RCTs have been developed in cognitive training interventions, comparative studies of merged interventions (cognitive, social and behavioral stimulation) with adequate control groups are absent, diminishing the professionals' trust on the adoption of these interventions for supporting patients. As such, the present proposal will develop a validation trial testing a multicomponent neuropsychological intervention (REMINDER), based on personal development, cognitive compensatory aids, meaningful goals setting, and behavior change techniques. The investigators will analyze its short/long-term gains and AD conversion rates. By aiming to provide a good validation study for REMINDER, the investigators will examine neurobiological, neurocognitive and functional outcomes of this intervention in comparison with an active control group (psychoeducation) in order to foster an effective outcome assessment of an intervention for individuals at risk of AD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overarching tenet of this project is that, by providing a manualized multidomain intervention - REMINDER - that engages at risk individuals in the aims of this protocol, it can have a significant impact on health outcomes, optimizing healthier lifestyles and these being also understood along with the neurodegeneration signs of this impact.

The specific aims of this study will be:

  • Recruit community-dwelling individuals with increased risk of dementia using CAIDE dementia risk score (with APOE, when available).
  • Evaluate the REMINDER program (in comparison to an active control group (CT) - psychoeducation sessions) immediate effects regarding global cognition and functionality (primary outcomes) and neuropsychological, biochemical and neuroimaging outcomes (secondary outcomes).
  • Determine the persistence of effects and begin characterizing the temporal course of putative benefits at 6-, and 18-months follow-up.
  • Investigate the role of biomarkers (imaging and biochemical) in explaining the response to intervention and persistence of the effects and its correlation with neuropsychological and functionality measures.
  • Measure the conversion rates from MCI to AD between the REMINDER and active control groups (at 24- months follow-up).

Our ultimate goal is to make available a scientifically validated and scalable intervention that helps prevent dementia in older adults at risk. By confirming the efficacy of REMINDER to prevent cognitive impairment and concluding for its medium-term efficacy to improve global cognitive function and healthy life habits the investigators are contributing to one of the WHO goals (Goal 3 - ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages) by addressing risk reduction and management of a global health risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3002-115
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60 or older
  • CAIDE dementia risk score >8
  • Cognitive function: absence of significant cognitive impairment as per the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-REVISED
  • Free of physical disabilities that preclude participation in the study
  • Willing to complete all study-related activities for 12 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mild cognitive impairment or dementia;
  • Presence of any neurological event in their medical history that could compromise actual cognition.
  • Presence of any severe psychiatric disorder (mild depressive and anxiety symptoms meet inclusion criteria).
  • Unability to travel to the site where the sessions will be delivered (if so randomization will be circumscribed between the experimental harm REMINDER online and the control group.
  • Illiteracy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: REMINDER program online
The REMINDER program in this arm will be delivered by videoconferencing. It will integrate 20 sessions (with approximate length of 45-60 min), therapist-mediated, carried out twice a week, over a period of 12 weeks. Psychoeducation sessions and part of the reminiscence and memory strategies training sessions will be facilitated in groups, as means to promote social support and modeling, and the remaining will be individual sessions. Several activities aimed to promote personal development and definition and achievement of meaningful goals will be included in the program, and the program will be manualized to facilitate its future dissemination and implementation
The REMINDER program is a therapist-mediated manualized neuropsychological intervention, involving training skills to stimulate cognitive reserve, socialization and personal development, to diminish the risk of cognitive decline.
Experimental: REMINDER program face-to-face
The REMINDER program in this arm will be delivered face to face. It will integrate 20 sessions (with approximate length of 45-60 min), therapist-mediated, carried out twice a week, over a period of 12 weeks. Psychoeducation sessions and part of the reminiscence and memory strategies training sessions will be facilitated in groups, as means to promote social support and modeling, and the remaining will be individual sessions. Several activities aimed to promote personal development and definition and achievement of meaningful goals will be included in the program, and the program will be manualized to facilitate its future dissemination and implementation
The REMINDER program is a therapist-mediated manualized neuropsychological intervention, involving training skills to stimulate cognitive reserve, socialization and personal development, to diminish the risk of cognitive decline.
Sham Comparator: Brain psychoeducation program
The control condition will have the same length as the experimental harms, including 20 psychoeducation sessions, with information regarding dementia modifiable risk factors, information on healthy lifestyles, and brain health promotion.
Delivery of psychoeducation sessions about dementia modifiable risk factors, brain health solutions and lifestyle change tips.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive status composite
Time Frame: Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
A composite score including the individual scores with Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - Revised (ACE-R) (0-100, higher scores meaning better outcome), that includes the Mini Mental State Examination - MMSE (0-30, with higher scores meaning better outcome), Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCDQ), Trail Making Test A and B (TMT A & B), Verbal Fluency - Phonemic (P, M and R) and Categories (Animals), Stroop Test, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) will be generated to work as primary outcome.
Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
Functionality status
Time Frame: Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
A composite score incorporating Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory (IAFAI), University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) will be used.
Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
Blood biomarkers of neural damage
Time Frame: Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
blood Neurofilament light chain (NfL) will be measured and tested as an outcome immediately after the intervention
Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
Cognitive status composite
Time Frame: Follow - up (12 months after the intervention)
A composite score including the individual scores with Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - Revised (ACE-R), that includes the Mini Mental State Examination - MMSE (screening tools to consider eligibility), Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCDQ), Trail Making Test A and B (TMT A & B), Verbal Fluency - Phonemic (P, M and R) and Categories (Animals), Stroop Test, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) will be generated to work as primary outcome
Follow - up (12 months after the intervention)
Functionality status
Time Frame: Follow - up (12 months after the intervention)
A composite score incorporating Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory (IAFAI), University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) will be used.
Follow - up (12 months after the intervention)
Cognitive status composite
Time Frame: Follow - up (24 months after the intervention)
A composite score including the individual scores with Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - Revised (ACE-R), that includes the Mini Mental State Examination - MMSE (screening tools to consider eligibility), Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCDQ), Trail Making Test A and B (TMT A & B), Verbal Fluency - Phonemic (P, M and R) and Categories (Animals), Stroop Test, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) will be generated to work as primary outcome
Follow - up (24 months after the intervention)
Functionality status
Time Frame: Follow - up (24 months after the intervention)
A composite score incorporating Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory (IAFAI), University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) will be used.
Follow - up (24 months after the intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain changes
Time Frame: Post intervention (2 weeks after the intervention sessions completion)
hippocampus volume and DMN connectivity will be measured pre and post intervention in the RCT phase
Post intervention (2 weeks after the intervention sessions completion)
Mood status
Time Frame: Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
The Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-15) (0-15, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes) and and The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory- Short Form (GAI-SF, 0-5, with higher scores meaning worse outcome) scores will be measured
Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
Mood status
Time Frame: Follow-up (12 months after the intervention)
The Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-15) (0-15, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes) and and The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory- Short Form (GAI-SF, 0-5, with higher scores meaning worse outcome) scores will be measured.
Follow-up (12 months after the intervention)
Perceived quality of life
Time Frame: Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
A measure of quality of life - World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old WHOQOL-OLD)will be incorporated to examine the effects of the program in self perceptions of well being. Higher scores mean better outcome
Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
Perceived quality of life
Time Frame: Follow-up (12 months after the intervention)
A measure of quality of life - World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old WHOQOL-OLD)will be incorporated to examine the effects of the program in self perceptions of well being. Higher scores mean better outcome
Follow-up (12 months after the intervention)
Perceived Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
A measure of self efficacy - Self Efficacy for Meaningful Activities (SEMActiv) will be implemented to examine self-efficacy, with higher scores meaning better outcome
Post intervention (1 week after the intervention sessions completion)
Perceived Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Follow-up (12 months after the intervention)
A measure of self efficacy - Self Efficacy for Meaningful Activities (SEMActiv) will be implemented to examine self-efficacy, with higher scores meaning better outcome
Follow-up (12 months after the intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REMINDER (Alias Study Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Open science plans will involve the sharing of IPD with other researchers, clearly anonymized in order to promote the studies replication. We are still building our plan for data sharing and we will update as soon as it is defined.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Aging

Clinical Trials on REMINDER

Subscribe