Comparison of Pulmonary Telerehabilitation and Physical Activity Recommendations in Patients With Post Covid Fibrosis

April 1, 2025 updated by: Ozge Ertan, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pulmonary Telerehabilitation and Physical Activity Recommendations in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis Due to COVID-19

Rehabilitation plays a very important role in the management of patients with COVID-19, focusing on respiratory and motor functions, and therefore the importance of establishing treatment strategies to ensure optimal recovery of these patients has been emphasized. It has been stated that physical activity recommendations should be clarified for the management of symptoms associated with prolonged COVID-19 Syndrome and for the continuation of activities of daily living. It has been stated that after COVID-19 pneumonia, it is necessary to evaluate the physical functions of patients with long-term follow-up and to establish rehabilitation programs. The importance of being included in the rehabilitation program was emphasized, especially for patients with lung fibrosis.

The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of pulmonary telerehabilitation and physical activity recommendations on exercise capacity and peripheral muscle strength in patients with pulmonary fibrosis due to COVID-19.

The secondary aim of this study is to compare the effects of pulmonary telerehabilitation and physical activity recommendations on symptoms, activity and participation in patients with pulmonary fibrosis due to COVID-19.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years old
  • Patients who have been infected with the COVID-19 virus at least three months ago and have been diagnosed with a positive PCR
  • Patients with post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis followed by a pulmonologist
  • Patients who have sufficient technological infrastructure to participate in the telerehabilitation program and can adapt to online systems
  • Patients who are clinically stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with orthopedic/neurological problems that prevent walking and exercise
  • Patients with uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pulmonary Rehabilitation Group
A total of 24 sessions of breathing exercises and high-repetitive muscle endurance and strengthening exercises will be applied to the pulmonary telerehabilitation group for 8 weeks, two days a week and one day a week unsupervised, via online systems. High-repetition muscle endurance and strengthening exercises will be applied to large muscle groups of the lower and upper extremities by creating resistance with body weight and theraband.
High repetition muscle endurance and strengthening exercises Walking
Active Comparator: Physical Activity Group
Respiratory exercises and physical activity recommendations will be given to the physical activity group. Physical activity recommendations are; It will include information about the importance of physical activity and walking 3-5 days a week for at least 30 minutes of moderate intensity (4-6 on the Modified Borg scale of perceived exertion level).
High repetition muscle endurance and strengthening exercises Walking

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peripheral muscle strength
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Hand-held dynamometer
1 week-8 week
Submaximal exercise capacity
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Six minute walk test and
1 week-8 week
maximal exercise capacity
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Incremental shuttle walk test
1 week-8 week
endurance exercise capacity
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
endurance shuttle walk test
1 week-8 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Pedometer and activity monitor
1 week-8 week
Physical fitness
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
1 min sit to stand test
1 week-8 week
Functionality
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Post covid-19 functionality scale (PCFS): The PCFS scale stratifies functional status limitation as follows: grade 0 (No functional limitations), grade 1 (Negligible functional limitations), grade 2 (Slight functional limitations), grade 3 (Moderate functional limitations), grade 4 (Severe functional limitations), and grade 5 (death)
1 week-8 week
Body composition
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Bioelectrical impedence analysis
1 week-8 week
Activities of daily living
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
London chest activity of daily living scale: Perceived dyspnea while performing daily living activities is scored between 0-5. A high score indicates greater disability in performing ADLs. The minimum score 0 and maximum total score is 75.
1 week-8 week
Dyspnea
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale stratifies severity of dyspnea in respiratory diseases. The mMRC scale is a self-rating tool to measure the degree of disability that breathlessness poses on day-to-day activities on a scale from 0 to 4: 0, no breathlessness except on strenuous exercise; 1, shortness of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill; 2, walks slower than people of same age on the level because of breathlessness or has to stop to catch breath when walking at their own pace on the level; 3, stops for breath after walking ∼100 m or after few minutes on the level; and 4, too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing or undressing
1 week-8 week
Fatigue
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a method of evaluating the impact of fatigue on patients. The FSS is a short questionnaire that requires to rate your level of fatigue. The FSS questionnaire contains nine statements that rate the severity of fatigue symptoms. Patients read each statement and circle a number from 1 to 7, based on how accurately it reflects their condition during the past week and how much they agree or disagree that the statement applies to patients. A low value (e.g., 1) indicates strong disagreement with the statement, whereas a high value (e.g., 7) indicates strong agreement. Total score between 9-63. A total score of less than 36 suggests that you may not be suffering from fatigue.
1 week-8 week
System usability
Time Frame: 8 week
System usability scale is a Likert Scale which includes 10 questions. Participants will rank each question from 1 to 5 based on how much they agree with the statement they are reading. 5 means they agree completely, 1 means they disagree vehemently.
8 week
Emotional status
Time Frame: 1 week-8 week
Hospital anxiety and depression scale is a self-report rating scale of 14 items on a 4-point Likert scale (range 0-3). It is designed to measure anxiety and depression (7 items for each subscale). The total score is the sum of the 14 items, and for each subscale the score is the sum of the respective seven items (ranging from 0-21).
1 week-8 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe