- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05299671
Video Consultation to Reduce Drug Interactions Among Patients Initiating Oral Anti-Cancer Drugs
February 12, 2025 updated by: Columbia University
Pilot Study to Assess Feasibility of a Pharmacist-Led Video Consultation to Reduce Drug Interactions Among Patients Initiating Oral Anti-Cancer Drugs
This is a non-randomized prospective pilot intervention study to assess the feasibility of a onetime pharmacist-led video consultation for medication review and patient education among patients initiating an oral anti-cancer drug.
In addition, investigator will evaluate reductions in polypharmacy, potential DDIs, and patient self-efficacy by comparing these variables for each patient before and after the video consultation.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
In this study, the investigator will be evaluating a 30-minute pharmacist-led video consultation to provide education about patients new oral anti-cancer drug (OACD) and help identify and manage potential drug-drug interactions alongside your oncologist.
While OACDs offer both clinical benefits and added convenience when compared to traditional intravenous chemotherapy, they also present a number of potential challenges.
One critical challenge involves the increased risk of taking multiple oral medications daily.
Patients taking multiple medications can result in harmful effects due to unexpected drug interactions, as well as patient confusion regarding when to take specific medications.
Given the relatively recent rise in available OACDs, little is known about the extent of this issue
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
44
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults age ≥18 years
- Patients must have access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer to facilitate a video visit, or be willing to come into the hospital to borrow a tablet for the visit
- Patients must have received a prescription for a new oral anti-cancer drug within 4 weeks of enrollment, not administered as part of a clinical trial
- Patients must take at least three prescribed, standing oral medications in addition to their newly prescribed anti-cancer drug
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not speak English or Spanish
- Patients without cognitive capacity to give informed consent for participation
- Patients uncomfortable with using video-based technology
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Video consultation group
Patients starting a new oral anti-cancer drug (OACD) will receive help to identify and manage potential drug-drug interactions alongside patient's oncologist through a one-time video consultation.
|
During the video visit, a pharmacist will speak with the patient about potential drug-drug interactions between the patient's cancer treatment and the other medications on the list, make recommendations about medication management (which will also be directly communicated to the oncologist), provide education about the patient's new OACD, and answer any questions.
The virtual consultation will last about 30 minutes via an electronic device.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of subjects enrolled that complete the 30 minutes consultation and assessments
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
To determine feasibility of a one-time pharmacist-led video consultation among advanced cancer patients initiating oral anti-cancer drugs.
Feasibility will be defined as significant evidence that 50% of enrolled patients will complete all components of the study.
|
30 minutes
|
|
Rate of absorption interaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Based on the pre-consultation medication reconciliation, we will assess the characteristics (absorption interaction) of medication list inaccuracies identified by medication reconciliation among study participants.
|
Baseline
|
|
Average of QTc prolongation
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Based on the pre-consultation medication reconciliation, we will assess the characteristics ( QTc prolongation) of medication list inaccuracies identified by medication reconciliation among study participants.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean of medication list inaccuracies among study participants prior to the consultation
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Based on the pre-consultation medication reconciliation, we will assess the mean number of medication list inaccuracies identified by medication reconciliation among study participants.
|
Baseline
|
|
Change in assess factors associated with OACD-related potential drug-drug interactions and medication inaccuracies
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
We will assess patient-level factors associated with OACD-related potential DDIs and medication inaccuracies, such as age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, cancer diagnosis, number of medications, and number of comorbidities.
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Number of medication changes recommended
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
The number of medication changes recommended to address polypharmacy and/or DDIs
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in the proportion of patients with a mitigated DDI
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
The proportion of patients with a mitigated DDI, defined as a change in one involved medication within 30 days of the consultation
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in proportion of patients with a reduction in total number of medications and/or supplements
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
The proportion of patients with a reduction in total number of medications and/or supplements within 30 days of the consultation
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) before and after the consultation
Time Frame: within 30 days of the consultation
|
The change in medication list complexity using the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) within 30 days of the consultation
|
within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Mean Score to Medication Self-Efficacy Scale (MASES) to assess patient confidence and competence regarding OACD administration before and after the consultation
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
The change in patient confidence and competence regarding OACD administration using a modified version of the Medication Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale (MASES-R) before and after the consultation
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in mean score on the Satisfaction with Information about Medications Scale (SIMS) before and after the consultation
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
Patient reported outcomes as measured by the Satisfaction with Information about Medications Scale (SIMS)
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in mean score on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) before and after the consultation
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
Patient reported outcomes as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in mean score on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) before and after the consultation
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
Patient reported outcomes as measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
|
Change in mean score on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) before and after the consultation
Time Frame: Within 30 days of the consultation
|
Patient reported outcomes as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
|
Within 30 days of the consultation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dawn Hershman, MD, Columbia University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 22, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 5, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
May 5, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 17, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
March 29, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 12, 2025
Last Verified
February 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAT3167
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cancer
-
Cellworks Group Inc.RecruitingCancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterCompletedCancer Liver | Cancer Brain | Cancer Head &Neck | Cancer PelvisUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Atrium Health Wake Forest BaptistRecruitingCancer | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAdvanced Cancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoBristol-Myers Squibb; PfizerTerminatedStage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Colon Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon Cancer | Stage IV Colon Cancer | Stage IV Rectal... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Palleon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedMelanoma | Cancer | Breast Cancer | Head and Neck Cancer | Gastric Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer | Ovarian Cancer | NSCLC | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Bladder Cancer | Colon Cancer | Urothelial Cancer | Oncology | CRC | Esophagogastric Junction Cancer | EGJUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); The Glimpse Group IncRecruitingCancer | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoWithdrawnCervical Cancer | Cervical Cancer Stage | Cervical Cancer Stage IB2 | Cervical Cancer Stage IB1 | Cervical Cancer Stage I | Cervical Cancer Stage IB | Cervical Cancer Stage II | Cervical Cancer Stage IIa | Cervical Cancer, Stage IIB | Cervical Cancer, Stage III | Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB | Cervical Cancer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Morehouse School of MedicineRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Video consultation
-
Rijnstate HospitalCompletedObstructive Sleep ApneaNetherlands
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Completed
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedEmergencies | Telemedicine | Telehealth | PrehospitalUnited States
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...RecruitingFunctional Dyspepsia | Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) | Abdominal Migraine | Functional Abdominal Pain DisordersNetherlands
-
Helse Stavanger HFCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Norway
-
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i GarrafInstitut Català de la SalutRecruitingVarious Clinical Conditions Commonly Followed up in a Secondary HospitalSpain
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalNanyang Technological University; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolActive, not recruiting
-
Copenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreHvidovre University HospitalRecruitingCardiac RehabilitationDenmark
-
dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MDCompletedCovid19 | Telemedicine | Pandemic | Virtual ClinicSaudi Arabia
-
University of Southern DenmarkVejle Hospital; Region of Southern Denmark; Odense Patient Data Explorative Network and other collaboratorsCompleted