Effects of Action Observation Training (AOT) in the Achievement of Urinary Continence in Men After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP)

April 4, 2022 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Urinary incontinence (UI) is one of the most common side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) and compromises men's quality of life. The first line treatment for urinary incontinence is the conservative approach of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) but, up to date, there seems to be no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of several proposed physiotherapy treatments.

Literature highlights the importance of also adding an educational component regarding the intentional contraction of the pelvic floor muscles (a skill termed "the Knack"). Moreover, in some studies, carried out on a sample of women, was introduced the use of virtual reality. This increased the adherence to treatment and showed an improvement in urinary continence. In addition to virtual reality, another intervention methodology used in physiotherapy is the one of Action Observation training (AOT) whose effectiveness has been proven both in sports and rehabilitation.

However, currently the effect of this innovative type of treatment has not yet been studied in men with UI following radical prostatectomy intervention.

The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the effectiveness of using AOT on urinary incontinence in subjects undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Milano
      • Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
        • Recruiting
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
        • Contact:
          • Roberto Gatti, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have undergone Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy with post-operative IU.
  • Objectivity of recruitment and contraction of pelvic floor musculature (PP) at manual perineal testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative incontinence
  • Pre-intervention radiotherapy
  • Previous urogenital surgery beyond Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.
  • Concomitant presence of neurological, internal or musculoskeletal diseases that may affect functional or motor recovery.
  • Less than 5 seconds of endurance in PP contraction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AOT
Participants who, in addiction to standard rehabilitation program after surgery (isometric exercises), underwent two training session of action observation therapy.
Subject is asked to observe videos with motor contents
No Intervention: Control group
Participants who received standard rehabilitation program after surgery. The control group, before performing the functional exercises watched two videos of different landscapes lasting 4 minutes each.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in continence using "24 hours pad test"
Time Frame: Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 1-week after T0 (T1), 2 weeks after T0 (T2), 4 weeks after T0 (T4), 6 weeks after T0 (T6) and 8 weeks after T0 (T8), 3 months after T8 (T9).
The primary outcome is to investigate if there is a difference in continence between the experimental and the control group at each physiotherapy session and compared to the baseline (T0).To quantify the extent of these losses, the weight of absorbent devices used by patients in the 24 hours prior to each evaluation will be measured.
Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 1-week after T0 (T1), 2 weeks after T0 (T2), 4 weeks after T0 (T4), 6 weeks after T0 (T6) and 8 weeks after T0 (T8), 3 months after T8 (T9).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in urinary symptoms using International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 8 weeks after T0 (T8) or earlier in case of achievement of the primary goal in previous sessions (T1, T2, T4, T6), and 3 months after T8 (T9).
The secondary objective is to investigate urinary symptoms using International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 8 weeks after T0 (T8) or earlier in case of achievement of the primary goal in previous sessions (T1, T2, T4, T6), and 3 months after T8 (T9).
Changes in the quality of life using quality life index (QoL index) 0-6
Time Frame: Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 8 weeks after T0 (T8) or earlier in case of achievement of the primary goal in previous sessions (T1, T2, T4, T6), and 3 months after T8 (T9).
The secondary objective is to investigate the quality of life using quality life index 0-6
Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 8 weeks after T0 (T8) or earlier in case of achievement of the primary goal in previous sessions (T1, T2, T4, T6), and 3 months after T8 (T9).
Changes in urinary symptoms using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
Time Frame: Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 8 weeks after T0 (T8) or earlier in case of achievement of the primary goal in previous sessions (T1, T2, T4, T6), and 3 months after T8 (T9).
The secondary objective is to investigate urinary symptoms using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
Both groups will be evaluated 45 days after surgery (T0), 8 weeks after T0 (T8) or earlier in case of achievement of the primary goal in previous sessions (T1, T2, T4, T6), and 3 months after T8 (T9).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Action observation training

Subscribe