- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05313984
OptiLUTS Part C: The Development of a Symptom Assessment Tool in Sacral Neuromodulation. (OptiLUTS)
Optimization of Therapy Resistant LUTS (OptiLUTS) Part C: The Development of a Symptom Assessment Tool in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Prospective Single Centre Study.
Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a two-staged 2nd-line therapy for therapy-resistant LUTS and fecal incontinence. Currently, the assessment of symptoms at baseline and after stage I is directed towards a discipline related evaluation. The OptiLUTS trial strives for a more holistic approach, taking all pelvic floor dysfunctions into account.
A holistic assessment tool will be developed and SNM-care pathway will be set-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A prospective single centre trial is set up. Patients planned for the two-staged tined lead procedure are enrolled.
Bladder and bowel diaries and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) will be collected at baseline and in between stage I and stage II, and PROMS at one month, 6 months and 12 months after definitive implant.
Phase I Step 1: The current implant rate, true success rate, outcomes and false positive rate will be measured.
Step 2: Development of a holistic symptom assessment tool. Phase II Implementation of the SNM care pathway.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ghent, Belgium, 9000
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects ≥ 18 years presenting with one or more of the following indications: Urinary urgency frequency with or without urinary incontinence (OAB dry or wet), non-obstructive urinary retention, dysfunctional voiding with post void residual volume, faecal incontinence and mixed incontinence
- Refractory to conservative treatment (i.e. Lifestyle changes, behavioural modification, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback) and refractory to pharmacological treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurogenic bladder.
- Anal sphincter damage more than 120
- Abnormal sacral anatomy
- Mentally or physically disabled patients not capable to handle a patient programmer device.
- Pregnant patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patients planned for the 2-staged tined-lead procedure.
Patients with the following indications:
|
Sacral neuromodulation: the 2-staged tined lead procedure. (Interstim II therapy, Medtronic). Stage I: Placement of a tined-lead electrode. 2 - 4 weeks test phase. Stage II: Placement of an implantable pulse generator.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implantation ratio
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
|
Proportion of number of patients who received a definitive implant.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
|
|
True success ratio
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
|
Proportion of patients showing both objective (ObS) and subjective success (SS) during the test phase of SNM.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
|
|
False positive ratio
Time Frame: One month after definitive implant.
|
Proportion of patients with discontinued SS although having true success during test phase.
|
One month after definitive implant.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Explantation ratio
Time Frame: Within 12 months after definitive implant.
|
Proportion of patients explanted.
|
Within 12 months after definitive implant.
|
|
Revision ratio
Time Frame: Within 12 months after definitive implant.
|
Proportion of patients that received a revision.
|
Within 12 months after definitive implant.
|
|
Absolute change in diary variables.
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, depending on the duration of the test phase.
|
Test phase compared to baseline.
(Different for each indication).
|
Up to 4 weeks, depending on the duration of the test phase.
|
|
Evolution of PROM scores over time.
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up.
|
Total PROM scores, based on questionnaires, baseline compared to scores at during the test phase vs. at 1 month, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up.
|
At 12 months follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Urologic Diseases
- Urinary Bladder Diseases
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
- Urological Manifestations
- Disease
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Urination Disorders
- Intestinal Diseases
- Rectal Diseases
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Syndrome
- Urinary Retention
- Fecal Incontinence
Other Study ID Numbers
- EC2018/0244
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Urinary Retention
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompleted
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterNot yet recruitingUrinary Retention | Urinary Retention Postoperative | Urinary Retention After Procedure
-
TriHealth Inc.Completed
-
Lundbeck FoundationCompletedPostoperative Urinary RetentionDenmark
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesTerminatedUrinary Retention PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of MichiganTerminatedPostoperative Urinary RetentionUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingUrinary Retention PostoperativeUnited States
-
Anand Rughani, MDMaineHealthCompletedPost-operative Urinary RetentionUnited States
-
University of RochesterTerminatedPost-Operative Urinary RetentionUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkLundbeck FoundationCompletedPostoperative Urinary Retention (POUR)Denmark
Clinical Trials on Sacral neuromodulation
-
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergCompletedAnorectal Malformations | Chronic Constipation With Overflow | Encopresis With Constipation and Overflow Incontinence | Hirschsprung's Disease | Sacral DysgenesisGermany
-
MedtronicNeuroRecruitingOveractive Bladder | Urinary Retention | Fecal IncontinenceUnited States
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRecruitingUltrasound | Sacral Neuromodulation | CystometryChina
-
Seinajoki Central HospitalTurku University Hospital; Helsinki University Central Hospital; Oulu University... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Cigli Regional Training HospitalCompleted
-
INOPASE Pty LtdRecruitingOveractive Bladder (OAB)Australia
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta; Hospital Universitari...CompletedLow Anterior Resection Syndrome | Rectal Cancer | Sacral Neuromodulation - Interstim TherapySpain
-
Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia; University of Pennsylvania; University of Washington and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Neuspera Medical, Inc.Not yet recruitingUrinary Urge Incontinence
-
Neuspera Medical, Inc.RecruitingUrinary Urge IncontinenceUnited States