Assessment of Foot Alignment and Pressure After Correction of Varus Knee by High Tibial Osteotomy or Total Knee Replacement

March 27, 2022 updated by: Abdelrhman Abdelaziz Khalaf Mohamed, Assiut University
This study evaluated the change in foot alignment after TKA or HTO by prospectively analyzing the correlation between the knee joint and the foot deformity, the post-operative improvement in the foot deformity, and the long-term post-operative changes in foot alignment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The mechanical alignment of the lower extremity is an important consideration in the long-term outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or high tibial osteotomy (HTO) . Alignment between the hip and the ankle through the knee joint has been used in determining coronal alignment, based on the assumption that weight-bearing forces pass through the centre of the knee joint during neutral mechanical. However, the weight-bearing vector can be affected by hindfoot and midfoot alignment because load is transmitted not from the ankle joint, but from the ground reaction point. Thus hindfoot alignment after knee correction may critically affect the longevity of the prosthesis

Most patients with some degree of knee joint deformity, which in turn may be associated with a deformity of the foot. In fact, an association between varus alignment of the knee joint and valgus alignment of the foot in osteoarthritis patients has been reported. Because the subtalar joint compensates for the knee joint deformity , correction of the deformity after TKA or HTO can affect foot alignment. Improvements in midfoot and hindfoot alignment have been noted in patients with osteoarthritis after correction of deformity. However, foot valgus may also persist, with little improvement after knee correction.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

total coverage of all cases admitted to Assiut University Hospitals in one year

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all varus aligned knee admitted to Assiut University Hospitals (Total Knee Arthroplasty or High Tibial Osteotomy) .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient with prior surgery of knee or foot . -secondary osteoarthritis. -valgus knee.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
: Radiological changes in hindfoot and midfoot alignment after correction of varus knee by High tibial osteotomy (HTO) or total knee arthroplasty(TKA)
Time Frame: 6-12 months

This study evaluated the change in foot alignment after TKA or HTO by:

  1. prospectively analyzing the correlation between the knee joint and the foot deformity.
  2. post-operative improvement in the foot deformity.
  3. the long-term post-operative changes in foot alignment.
6-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical assessment of the foot by american orthopedic foot&ankle society ( AOFAS) before and after knee correction
Time Frame: 6-12 months
AOFAS covers four different regions of the foot: The ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-interphalangeal (IP) for the hallux, and MTP-IP for the lesser toes.These four anatomic regions have their own version of the AOFAS survey. Each c is designed to be used independent of the others. However, each measure is comprised of nine questions and cover three categories: Pain (40 points), function (50 points) and alignment (10 points). These are all scored together for a total of 100 points
6-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • foot alignment and pressure

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varus Deformity

Subscribe