Dose-ranging, PK, Safety, Efficacy Study of Osanetant in Patients With Moderate/Severe VMS Associated With Menopause

July 15, 2024 updated by: Acer Therapeutics Inc.

A Phase 2A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of ACER-801 for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) Associated With Menopause

In this clinical research study, subjects will be given the study drug, ACER-801 (osanetant) or placebo (looks like the study drug but contains no active ingredients). The study drug works on a receptor in the brain and the intended purpose is for the study treatment of moderate to severe Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) also referred to as hot flashes or flushes associated with menopause. Hot flashes are a change in your temperature that occurs due to changes in your hormones.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in post menopausal women in which the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of ACER-801 (osanetant 50 mg twice daily [BID], 100 mg BID, and 200 mg BID) will be compared to placebo.

Subjects will enter a Screening Period to determine eligibility. Subjects will be required to complete hot flash diaries for 2 weeks prior to randomization. Eligible subjects will be admitted to a Clinical Research Unit and remain in the clinic for 14 days after completion of treatment and all study assessments. The study includes a 14 day safety follow-up assessment. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • West Bend, Wisconsin, United States, 53095
        • Spaulding Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Post-menopausal female subjects 40-65 years of age, inclusive.

    Menopause will be defined as:

    1. At least 12 months of spontaneous, continuous amenorrhea, or
    2. At least 6 months of spontaneous, continuous amenorrhea with serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels > 40 mIU/mL at screening, or
    3. At least 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy.
  2. At baseline women:

    1. With an average number of moderate to severe hot flashes/day for 2 weeks prior to randomization (per continuous hot flash diary).
    2. That have a change of < 50% in average 24-hour hot flash frequency 2 weeks prior to randomization.

      • Moderate: defined as sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity.
      • Severe: defined as sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any active comorbid disease deemed by the investigator to be clinically significant, which could impact safety during study conduct including renal or hepatic impairment.
  2. Use of any prohibited medications.
  3. Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2.
  4. Any active ongoing condition that could cause difficulty in interpreting vasomotor symptoms.
  5. Inability to complete questionnaires and continuous hot flash diary for any reason.
  6. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in the study for any other reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ACER-801 50 mg BID
ACER-801 (osanetant) 50 mg BID (1 x 50 mg and 3 x placebo, twice daily)
50 mg BID (twice daily)
Other Names:
  • osanetant
Experimental: ACER-801 100 mg BID
ACER-801 (osanetant) 100 mg BID (2 x 50 mg and 2 x placebo, twice daily)
100 mg BID (twice daily)
Other Names:
  • osanetant
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo (4 x Placebo of ACER-801 twice daily)
Placebo
Other Names:
  • Placebo of ACER-801
Experimental: ACER-801 200 mg BID
ACER-801 (osanetant) 200 mg BID (4 x 50 mg and 0 x placebo, twice daily)
200 mg BID (twice daily)
Other Names:
  • osanetant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 1

maximum concentration of ACER-801 measured at Day 1

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Cmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 1
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14

maximum concentration of ACER-801 measured at Day 14

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Cmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 14
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 1

peak concentration of ACER-801 metabolite measured at Day 1

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Cmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 1
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14

peak concentration of ACER-801 metabolite measured at Day 14

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Cmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 14
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 1

time to reach maximum concentration of ACER-801 measured at Day 1

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Tmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 1
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14

time to reach maximum concentration of ACER-801 at Day 14

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Tmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 14
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 1

time to reach maximum concentration of ACER-801 metabolite at Day 1

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Tmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 1
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14

Time to reach maximum concentration of ACER-801 metabolite at Day 14

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only Tmax (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 14
Area Under the Concentration Curve From Dosing to the Time of the Last Measured Concentration (AUClast) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 1

Area under the concentration time curve (AUC) from the time of dosing (0 hour) to the time of the last quantifiable (positive) concentration (Tlast) of ACER-801, calculated by a combination of linear and logarithmic trapezoidal methods (linear up/log down method)

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only AUClast (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 1
Area Under the Concentration Curve From Dosing to the Time of the Last Measured Concentration (AUClast) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14

Area under the concentration time curve (AUC) from the time of dosing (0 hour) to the time of the last quantifiable (positive) concentration (Tlast) of ACER-801, calculated by a combination of linear and logarithmic trapezoidal methods (linear up/log down method)

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only AUClast (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 14
Area Under the Concentration Curve From Dosing to the Time of the Last Measured Concentration (AUClast) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 1

Area under the concentration time curve (AUC) from the time of dosing (0 hour) to the time of the last quantifiable (positive) concentration (Tlast) of ACER-801 metabolite, calculated by a combination of linear and logarithmic trapezoidal methods (linear up/log down method)

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only AUClast (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 1
Area Under the Concentration Curve From Dosing to the Time of the Last Measured Concentration (AUClast) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14

Area under the concentration time curve (AUC) from the time of dosing (0 hour) to the time of the last quantifiable (positive) concentration (Tlast) of ACER-801 metabolite, calculated by a combination of linear and logarithmic trapezoidal methods (linear up/log down method)

Blood sampling included predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs (prior to evening dose) and 15 hrs post morning dose. Only AUClast (mean, SD) data are available due to abbreviated data analyses.

Day 14
Half-life (T1/2) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 1
Terminal elimination half-life of ACER-801
Day 1
Half-life (T1/2) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14
Terminal elimination half-life of ACER-801
Day 14
Half-life (T1/2) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 1
Terminal elimination half-life of ACER-801 metabolite
Day 1
Half-life (T1/2) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14
Terminal elimination half-life of ACER-801 metabolite
Day 14
Number and Percentage of Adverse Events ≥ 5%
Time Frame: 2 weeks
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of the investigational product in humans, whether or not considered related to investigational product. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with any use of the investigational product, without any judgment about causality and irrespective of route of administration, formulation, or dose, including an overdose.
2 weeks
Number and Percentage of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
An AE is considered "serious" if, in the view of either the investigator or Acer, it results in any of the following outcomes: Death, Is immediately life threatening; Requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; Results in a congenital abnormality or birth defect; Is an important medical event that may jeopardize the subject or may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
2 weeks
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued From the Study
Time Frame: Over 2 weeks
Discontinuation or withdrawal from the study.
Over 2 weeks
Number of Patients With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Abnormalities Detected During Physical Examination
Time Frame: At Day 14 relative to Baseline
A physician or appropriately qualified delegate conducted a full physical examination at baseline and at Day 14. The investigator decides if findings are considered abnormal at baseline and at Day 14 and whether the change is clinically significant. Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
At Day 14 relative to Baseline
Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (ARcmax) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14
Cmax (maximum concentration) Accumulation Ratio calculated as Cmax,Day14/ Cmax,Day1 and AUCt,Day14/ AUCt,Day1, where the dosing interval t is 12h.
Day 14
Accumulation Ratio for AUC (ARauc) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14
AUC (area under the curve) Accumulation Ratio calculated as Cmax,Day14/ Cmax,Day1 and AUCt,Day14/ AUCt,Day1, where the dosing interval t is 12h.
Day 14
Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (ARcmax) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14
Cmax (maximum concentration) Accumulation Ratio calculated as Cmax,Day14/ Cmax,Day1 and AUCt,Day14/ AUCt,Day1, where the dosing interval t is 12h.
Day 14
Accumulation Ratio for AUC (ARauc) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14
AUC (area under the curve) Accumulation Ratio calculated as Cmax,Day14/ Cmax,Day1 and AUCt,Day14/ AUCt,Day1, where the dosing interval t is 12h.
Day 14
Metabolite: Parent Ratio of AUC (MRauc)
Time Frame: Day 1

MR = Metabolite:Parent Ratio calculated as Cm,day14/ Cp,day1 and AUCt,m,day14/ AUCt,p,day1, where m and p are the metabolite and parent drug, respectively, and t is the dosing interval (12 h).

AUC = area under the curve

Day 1
Metabolite: Parent Ratio of AUC (MRauc)
Time Frame: Day 14
AUC (area under the curve) MR = Metabolite:Parent Ratio calculated as Cm,day14/ Cp,day1 and AUCt,m,day14/ AUCt,p,day1, where m and p are the metabolite and parent drug, respectively, and t is the dosing interval (12 h).
Day 14
Metabolite:Parent Ratio of Cmax (MRcmax)
Time Frame: Day 1

MR = Metabolite:Parent Ratio calculated as Cm,day14/ Cp,day1 and AUCt,m,day14/ AUCt,p,day1, where m and p are the metabolite and parent drug, respectively, and t is the dosing interval (12 h).

ACER-801 (parent); Cmax (maximum concentration)

Day 1
Metabolite:Parent Ratio of Cmax (MRcmax)
Time Frame: Day 14

MR = Metabolite:Parent Ratio calculated as Cm,day14/ Cp,day1 and AUCt,m,day14/ AUCt,p,day1, where m and p are the metabolite and parent drug, respectively, and t is the dosing interval (12 h).

ACER-801 (parent); Cmax (maximum concentration)

Day 14
Area Under the Concentration Curve From t0 to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 1
AUC from the time of dosing (0 hour) extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUClast + Clast/λz, where Clast was the last quantifiable concentration, and λz was the terminal elimination rate constant Reliability of AUCinf values was contingent upon AUCext and λz Profiles with AUCext ≤20% and a λz which met reporting criteria were considered reliable and AUCinf was reported. For profiles that did not meet these criteria, AUCinf and any parameter requiring AUCinf for computation were not reported.
Day 1
Area Under the Concentration Curve From t0 to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of ACER-801
Time Frame: Day 14
AUC from the time of dosing (0 hour) extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUClast + Clast/λz, where Clast was the last quantifiable concentration, and λz was the terminal elimination rate constant Reliability of AUCinf values was contingent upon AUCext and λz Profiles with AUCext ≤20% and a λz which met reporting criteria were considered reliable and AUCinf was reported. For profiles that did not meet these criteria, AUCinf and any parameter requiring AUCinf for computation were not reported.
Day 14
Area Under the Concentration Curve From t0 to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 1
AUC from the time of dosing (0 hour) extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUClast + Clast/λz, where Clast was the last quantifiable concentration, and λz was the terminal elimination rate constant Reliability of AUCinf values was contingent upon AUCext and λz Profiles with AUCext ≤20% and a λz which met reporting criteria were considered reliable and AUCinf was reported. For profiles that did not meet these criteria, AUCinf and any parameter requiring AUCinf for computation were not reported.
Day 1
Area Under the Concentration Curve From t0 to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of ACER-801 Metabolite
Time Frame: Day 14
AUC from the time of dosing (0 hour) extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUClast + Clast/λz, where Clast was the last quantifiable concentration, and λz was the terminal elimination rate constant Reliability of AUCinf values was contingent upon AUCext and λz Profiles with AUCext ≤20% and a λz which met reporting criteria were considered reliable and AUCinf was reported. For profiles that did not meet these criteria, AUCinf and any parameter requiring AUCinf for computation were not reported.
Day 14
Number of Subjects With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline for Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: HEMATOLOGY
Time Frame: Over 2 weeks
Blood samples will be measured for hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood count with differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils), platelet count, red blood cell count (including mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration). Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
Over 2 weeks
Number of Subjects With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline for Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: SERUM CHEMISTRY
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Blood samples will be measured for albumin, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, potassium, sodium, total cholesterol, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase, phosphorus, total protein, uric acid. Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
2 weeks
Number of Subjects With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline for Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: COAGULATION
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Blood samples will be measured for prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio. Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
2 weeks
Number of Subjects With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline for Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: URINALYSIS
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Urine samples will be measured for pH, specific gravity, protein, glucose, ketones, bilirubin. Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
2 weeks
Number of Subjects With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline for Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: BONE DENSITY MARKERS
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Blood samples not available/collected for testing. Blood samples will be measured for Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP), osteocalcin, amino terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (P1NP) and Collagen Type- C-Telopeptide (CTX). Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
2 weeks
Number of Subjects With a Clinically Significant Change From Baseline for Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: HORMONES
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Blood samples not available/collected for testing. Blood samples will be measured for catecholamines, vasopressin, gonadotropins, estradiol, testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), T3 (Total and Free), T4 (Total and Free), prolactin, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and insulin. Only clinically significant changes will be reported.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Frequency of Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) From Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 1 relative to Baseline

Frequency is the number of vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes) recorded by the subject in the continuous diary.

Week 1

At Week 1 relative to Baseline
Change in Frequency Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) From Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 2 relative to Baseline

Frequency is the number of vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes) recorded by the subject in the continuous diary.

Week 2

At Week 2 relative to Baseline
Change in Severity of Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) From Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 1 relative to Baseline

Patients recorded in a continuous diary the number of individual hot flashes experienced and rated the severity of each on a scale of mild, moderate, or severe where mild is assigned a value of 1, moderate a value of 2, and severe a value of 3 during data analysis.

Daily severity was calculated as [(1 × number of mild hot flashes) + (2 × number of moderate hot flashes) + (3 × number of severe hot flashes)]/total number of hot flashes reported. The value at Week 1 was subtracted from the value at Baseline to yield the impact on severity score. A negative change indicates a reduction in severity.

At Week 1 relative to Baseline
Change in Severity of Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) From Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 2 relative to Baseline

Patients recorded in a continuous diary the number of individual hot flashes experienced and rated the severity of each on a scale of mild, moderate, or severe where mild is assigned a value of 1, moderate a value of 2, and severe a value of 3 during data analysis.

Daily severity was calculated as [(1 × number of mild hot flashes) + (2 × number of moderate hot flashes) + (3 × number of severe hot flashes)]/total number of hot flashes reported. The value at Week 2 was subtracted from the value at Baseline to yield the impact on severity score. A negative change indicates a reduction.

At Week 2 relative to Baseline
Change in Hot Flash Severity Score Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 1 relative to Baseline

The hot flash severity score is a composite of the frequency and severity of hot flashes, and was calculated as follows: [number of mild hot flashes on Day Y x 1] + [number of moderate hot flashes on Day Y x 2] + [number of severe hot flashes on Day Y x 3].

The value at Week 1 was subtracted from the value at Baseline to yield the impact on the composite hot flash severity score. A negative change indicates a reduction.

At Week 1 relative to Baseline
Change in Hot Flash Severity Score of Vasomotor Symptoms From Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 2 relative to Baseline

The hot flash severity score is a composite of the frequency and severity of hot flashes, and was calculated as follows: [number of mild hot flashes on Day Y x 1] + [number of moderate hot flashes on Day Y x 2] + [number of severe hot flashes on Day Y x 3].

The value at Week 2 was subtracted from the value at Baseline to yield the impact on hot flash severity score. A negative change indicates a reduction in severity.

At Week 2 relative to Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Boston, MSN, APNP, Spaulding Clinical Research LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe