InSpace Accelerated Rehabilitation Study (iAccelerate)

March 13, 2024 updated by: Stryker Endoscopy

An Assessment of Two Accelerated Rehabilitation Programs for Use With the InSpaceTM Subacromial Tissue Spacer System in the Treatment of Full-thickness Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

This is a prospective, parallel group, open-label, multi- center, randomized study to assess two accelerated rehabilitation programs for use with the InSpace device in the treatment of full thickness Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears (MIRCTs) performed during an arthroscopic procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Objectives:

Primary:

• To evaluate clinical outcomes of both a formalized or an at-home rehabilitation program when used in conjunction with the InSpace device as compared to the corresponding InSpace Pivotal study results.

  • To demonstrate consistency of each intervention group with the corresponding historical control study results.
  • To demonstrate that comparable clinical outcomes can be achieved for each intervention group.

Secondary:

• Change in clinical outcomes compared to baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • Recruiting
        • Musculoskeletal-Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Amini, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael Rose, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Brown, MD
    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80112
        • Recruiting
        • Steadman Hawkins Clinic Denver
        • Principal Investigator:
          • James Genuario
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Brayden Mayer
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Martin Boublik
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thomas Noonan
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adam Seidl
        • Contact:
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33308
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
        • Recruiting
        • Paley Orthopaedics & Spine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jonathan Levy, MD
        • Contact:
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30329
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric Wagner, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael Gottschalk, MD
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Recruiting
        • Rush University Medical Center
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gregory Nicholson, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Brian Cole, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nikhil Verma, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Grant Garrigues, MD
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joaquin Sanchez Sotelo
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Fu, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Joshua Dines, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78258
        • Recruiting
        • TSAOG Orthopaedics & Spine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert Hartzler, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lane Naugher, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sergio Viroslav, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects MUST meet ALL the following criteria to be included in the study:

  • The subject has signed the IRB approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) specific to this study prior to enrollment
  • Is male or female ≥ sixty-five (65) years of age
  • Positive diagnostic imaging by MRI within 9 months of enrollment of the index shoulder indicating a full thickness MRCT:

    • Measuring ≥ 5 cm in diameter
    • Involving ≥ two tendons
  • Functional deltoid muscle and preserved passive range of motion on physical examination
  • Documented VAS score > 30 mm pain
  • Failed non-operative treatment of at least 3 months from the initial treatment to include one or more of the following:

    • Oral analgesics
    • Anti-inflammatory medication (e.g., ibuprofen, naproxen)
    • Corticosteroid injection(s)
    • Physical therapy
    • Activity modification
    • Rest (sling used)
  • Must be able to read and understand the approved Informed Consent Form (written and oral)
  • Must be in general good health (as determined by the Investigator) based on screening assessments and medical history
  • Must be independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations, visits, and electronic database collection

Intra-operative Inclusion Criteria

Subjects MUST meet the following criteria to be randomized in the study:

  • Full thickness tear
  • Tear size ≥ 5 cm in diameter
  • Tear involving ≥ two tendons

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be excluded from the study, if they meet ANY of the following individual exclusion criteria:

  • Known allergy to the device material (copolymer of PLA (poly (lactic acid) and -ε-caprolactone)
  • Evidence of the following conditions:

    • Severe gleno-humeral or acromio-humeral arthritis
    • Full thickness cartilage loss as seen on MRI
    • History within the past 5 years of anterior or posterior shoulder subluxation or dislocation as determined by history, examination, or radiographic findings
    • Pre-existing deltoid defect or deltoid palsy
    • Major joint trauma, infection, or necrosis
    • Partial thickness tears of the supraspinatus
    • Fully reparable rotator cuff tear [Tear of less than 5 cm in diameter (or < 4 cm2) with retractable tendon that can be fully repaired]
    • Known neurovascular compromise
    • Complete deltoid muscle palsy
    • Traumatic muscle tears of the pectoralis or deltoid
  • The subject requires concomitant:

    • Subscapularis repair
    • Labral repair of any type
    • Biceps tenodesis
  • Previous surgery of the index shoulder in the past 1 year, excluding diagnostic arthroscopy
  • The subject's condition is bilateral and rotator cuff repair is scheduled or to be scheduled over the course of this study for the contra lateral shoulder
  • Major medical condition that could affect quality of life and influence the results of the study (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
  • The subject has documented evidence of a history (e.g., liver testing) of drug/alcohol abuse within 12 months of enrollment
  • The subject's condition represents a worker's compensation case
  • The subject is currently involved in a health-related litigation procedure
  • Females of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant.
  • Concurrent participation in an investigational clinical study one month prior to enrollment or during the entire study period
  • The subject is physically or mentally compromised (e.g., currently being treated for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, etc.), to the extent that the Investigator judges the subject to be unable or unlikely to remain compliant to follow-up
  • The subject is receiving prescription narcotic pain medication for conditions unrelated to the index shoulder condition
  • The subject currently has an acute infection in the area surrounding the surgical site.
  • Baseline WORC score less than 420

Intra-operative Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will not be randomized and will be terminated from the study if they meet ANY of the following individual intra-operative exclusion criteria:

  • Rotator cuff is/presents with:

    • Fully reparable with adequate tissue and muscle quality (equivalent to Goutallier stage 1 or 2)
    • Partial thickness tear of the supraspinatus
    • Evidence of significant osteoarthritis
  • The subject requires concomitant:

    • Subscapularis repair
    • Labral repair of any type
    • Biceps tenodesis
  • Coracoacromial ligament functional deficiency or shoulder instability is identified

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I
InSpace device + accelerated rehabilitation in a formalized program (FP)
Rotator Cuff Tear Treatment
Experimental: Group II
InSpace device + accelerated rehabilitation in an at-home program (AHP)
Rotator Cuff Tear Treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in American Shoulder and Elbow (ASES) Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 12

This is a subject self-report questionnaire and Investigator assessment questionnaire. The subject portion collects information on activities of daily living (i.e., 10 questions). The Investigator assessment portion documents ROM (forward elevation/flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, cross-body adduction), signs, strength, and instability. ASES minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) have been previously described for the ASES score in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair as 11.1 and 17.5, respectively.

Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score will be expressed as the percentages demonstrating a minimal clinical important difference (MCID; ASES ≥ 11.1) and the substantial clinical benefit (SCB; ASES ≥ 17.5) in ASES from baseline at Month 12. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 100 (with a higher score indicating a better outcome).

Day 0 through Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Assessment
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24
• Safety will be evaluated by type, frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events to study intervention at each follow-up visit through Month 24
Day 0 through Month 24
Change in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24

Change in WORC Score from baseline. Minimum value: 2,100, Maximum value: 0 (with a lower score indicating a better outcome).

This is a subject self-report questionnaire that is a disease-specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool specifically designed to evaluate quality of life in persons with pathology of the rotator cuff. It is comprised of 21 items in 5 domains (i.e., physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, lifestyle, emotions).

Day 0 through Month 24
Change in Constant Score (CS) Outcome Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24

Change in CS Outcome Score from baseline. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 100 (with a higher score indicating a better outcome).

This is a self-reported questions as well as Investigator or designee performed assessment of the shoulder. The tool is divided into four subscales: pain, activities of daily living, strength and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder.

Day 0 through Month 24
Change in EuroQol 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24

Change in EQ-5D-5L Score from baseline. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 100 (with a higher score indicating a better outcome).

This is a subject self-report questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL). It consists of 5 questions capturing the subject's current health across five dimensions (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). It also includes a numerical visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).

Day 0 through Month 24
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24
Change in VAS Score from baseline. This is a subject self-report questionnaire to measure pain. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. (An extreme amount of pain would be considered a worse outcome)
Day 0 through Month 24
Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24
Change in ROM Score from baseline. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 180 (with a higher score indicating a better outcome).
Day 0 through Month 24
Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24

Change in SANE from baseline. Minimum value: 0%, Maximum value: 100% (with 100% being normal).

This is a subject self-report questionnaire to measure function. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state of functional improvement. Example: "How would you rate your affected shoulder today as a percentage of normal (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal)?"

Day 0 through Month 24
Patient's satisfaction with their procedure
Time Frame: Month 12 and Month 24

Patient Satisfaction Score at Month 12 and Month 24.

This is a single-question to evaluate the patients' current state of satisfaction. Responses are binary with Yes or No answers. ('Yes' would be considered a positive outcome)

Month 12 and Month 24
Costing
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24
Costs associated with all visits
Day 0 through Month 24
Time to Recovery
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24
Time to recovery by cumulative time between discharge and return to driving
Day 0 through Month 24
Analgesia Use
Time Frame: Day 0 through Month 24
Analgesia use (drug and frequency)
Day 0 through Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Colleen Roden, MS, Stryker Endoscopy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SYK-SM-2021-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Trials on InSpace Subacromial Tissue Spacer

3
Subscribe