- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05331937
TMS for Exposure Therapy Resistant OCD (TETRO)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Patients With Exposure Therapy-resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD): TETRO - a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rationale:
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a serious and disabling mental disorder, characterized by obsessions and compulsions and associated with substantial comorbidity and morbidity (Stein et al. 2019). Approximately 50% of patients treated with standard treatments (exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) with/without medication) fail to respond fully, resulting in chronicity and poor participation in social and educational/occupational domains. We propose to fill the gap between the standard treatments (exposure therapy with/without medication) on the one side and invasive end-stage strategies (brain surgery) on the other side, using a non-invasive alternative: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Despite proven efficacy (Zhou et al. 2017; Rehn et al. 2018; Fitzsimmons et al. 2022), rTMS for OCD is not yet covered by the Dutch insurance system while rTMS for treatment resistant depression is. This multi-center randomized controlled trial, supported by the 'veelbelovende zorg' grant of Zorg Instituut Nederland (ZIN), aims to establish the added value of rTMS applied over the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) when combined with ERP in OCD patients, who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication). In case of proven cost-effectiveness it will lead to the addition of rTMS as insured health care for patients with OCD.
Objective: assess the (cost-)effectiveness of 1Hz rTMS to the pre-SMA as adjuvant treatment to ERP in OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication)
Study design: multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months
Study population: 250 adult (18 years and older) OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP
Intervention (if applicable): Low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the pre-SMA (compared to sham rTMS to the pre-SMA) as adjuvant treatment to ERP, 4 times/week for at least 5 weeks (20 sessions), with optional extension phase of 1 or 2 weeks (maximum of 28 sessions in total)
Main study parameters/endpoints: the pre-versus-post-treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) in severity of OCD (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale - Y-BOCS), version 2. The post-treatment Y-BOCS score will be obtained at the end of treatment, i.e, after 20, 24 or 28 sessions.
Secondary study parameters/endpoints:
- Response (≥35% reduction on Y-BOCS-v2) and remission (Y-BOCS≤12) as established through international expert opinion
- Standard Mean Difference (SMD) on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale
- Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale
- Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
- Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
- Depression, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up. In addition we will administer a visual analogue scale (VAS) for depression at these same time points, plus every week during treatment, to monitor the effects of treatment on severity of depressive symptoms.
- Anxiety, measured using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and a VAS; following the same procedure and rationale as for depression.
- Tolerability of the treatment and side effects, using an in-house questionnaire
Exploratory outcomes and/or influencing factors:
- Patient adherence to treatment protocol, as measured using the Patient Exposure and Response Prevention Adherence Scale (PEAS)
- Difference between responders and non-responders on circadian rhythm and sleep disorders at baseline as defined by the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (HSDQ).
- Structural brain network characteristics (using T1 and diffusion weighted scans) to predict treatment response / relapse.
- Functional resting-state and task-based (during emotional processing) brain network characteristics (using echo-planar imaging) to predict treatment response / relapse.
- Variation in the exact stimulation location as ascertained and recorded by neuronavigation in relation to treatment outcome.
- Contribution of demographic and clinical variables (sex, age, medication status) and pre-existing comorbidities (i.e. comorbid tics, depression, anxiety, autism) to the variance in treatment outcome.
- In OCD patients with comorbid tics: tic severity, measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS).
- Variation in treatment expectancy (7-items credibility and expectancy questionnaire (CEQ)) and blinding success (1-item question 'in which condition do you think you were?') in relation to treatment outcome.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Odile A van den Heuvel, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31-20-4444444
- Email: oa.vandenheuvel@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Tjardo S Postma, MD
- Phone Number: +31-20-4444444
- Email: tetro@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- GGz inGeest
-
Contact:
- Neeltje M Batelaan, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31-20-788 4641
- Email: n.batelaan@ggzingeest.nl
-
Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- NeuroCare
-
Contact:
- Iris van Oostrom, PhD
- Phone Number: +31-24-7503507
- Email: iris.vanoostrom@neurocaregroup.com
-
Groningen, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- NeuroCare
-
Contact:
- Iris van Oostrom, PhD
- Phone Number: +31-24-7503507
- Email: iris.vanoostrom@neurocaregroup.com
-
Maastricht, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Maastricht UMC+
-
Contact:
- Alexander Sack, PhD
- Email: a.sack@maastrichtuniversity.nl
-
Maastricht, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Mondriaan
-
Contact:
- Koen Schruers, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31-88-5066262
- Email: koen.schruers@maastrichtuniversity.nl
-
Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Radboudumc
-
Contact:
- Indira Tendolkar, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31-24-3613489
- Email: indira.tendolkar@radboudumc.nl
-
Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- ProPersona
-
Contact:
- Gert-Jan Hendriks, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31-06-13 578578
- Email: g.hendriks@propersona.nl
-
-
Noord-Holland
-
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1081 HZ
- Recruiting
- Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Odile A van den Heuvel, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31-20-4444444
- Email: oa.vandenheuvel@amsterdamumc.nl
-
Principal Investigator:
- O A van den Heuvel, MD PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- OCD as current primary diagnosis
- Age 18 and older
- Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score of 16 or higher.
- Insufficient response to state-of-the art exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) and/or drop-out from ERP due to extreme anxiety/avoidance
- The following comorbid disorders are allowed (as long as OCD is the current primary diagnosis): depression, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, tic/Tourette's disorder, eating disorders, personality disorders, autism spectrum disorder (when this does not dominate the clinical profile, i.e. is not main diagnosis).
- Commitment to actively undergo intensive exposure therapy (both supervised during ERP sessions, as well as unsupervised at home)
- Unmedicated (for at least 8 weeks) or stable dosage of psychotropic medication (for at least 8 weeks), involving serotonergic antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, clomipramine). Other psychotropic medication that is allowed (provided dosage is stably established for at least 8 weeks): methylphenidate, mood stabilizers, antipsychotic drugs
- Ability to participate in frequent treatment sessions (4 days/week, for 5 (or 6, or 7) weeks) at one of the 5 sites nearest to their home and/or work
- Ability to participate in pre-treatment MRI session (for neuronavigation) at one of the 3 academic sites nearest to their home and/or work
- Capacity for providing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- OCD patients with hoarding as main symptom dimension
- The following comorbid disorders (current diagnosis) are not allowed: psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder (when this dominates the clinical profile, i.e. is diagnosed as main disorder), substance use disorder
- Active suicidal thoughts and intent to act on it
- Chronic use of benzodiazepines is not allowed
- Cochlear implant
- (History of) epilepsy
- Pregnancy
- Extreme claustrophobia or metallic objects in or on the body, preventing from participation in MRI session
- Space-occupying lesion on MRI
- Previous rTMS treatment (for blinding reasons)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: real rTMS
verum rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA
|
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS
sham rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA
|
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
YBOCS-2
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment)
|
pre-versus-post-treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) in severity of OCD as measured with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (version 2)
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
response and remission
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
response: ≥35% reduction on Y-BOCS | remission: Y-BOCS≤12
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Standard Mean Difference (SMD) on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
global functioning
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
global improvement
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
quality of life
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
cost effectiveness
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
cost effectiveness
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
depression, measured through the Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
comorbid depression
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
anxiety, measured through the Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
comorbid anxiety
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Tolerability of the treatment and side effects, using an in-house questionnaire
Time Frame: after 1st and last week of treatment
|
tolerability and side effects
|
after 1st and last week of treatment
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
tic severity, measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
tic severity (only in OCD patients with comorbid tics)
|
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fitzsimmons SMDD, van der Werf YD, van Campen AD, Arns M, Sack AT, Hoogendoorn AW; other members of the TETRO Consortium, van den Heuvel OA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and pairwise/network meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.048. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
- Rehn S, Eslick GD, Brakoulias V. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Cortical Targets Used in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):645-665. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9566-7.
- Zhou DD, Wang W, Wang GM, Li DQ, Kuang L. An updated meta-analysis: Short-term therapeutic effects of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jun;215:187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.033. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
- Stein DJ, Costa DLC, Lochner C, Miguel EC, Reddy YCJ, Shavitt RG, van den Heuvel OA, Simpson HB. Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Aug 1;5(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0102-3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021.0670 - NL78930.029.21
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedPost-traumatic Stress DisorderFrance
-
MGH Institute of Health ProfessionsNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)Recruiting
-
Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, FranceRecruiting
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.RecruitingBipolar II Disorder, Most Recent Episode Major DepressiveTaiwan
-
Krystal Parker, PhDRecruitingDepression | Schizophrenia | Parkinson Disease | Bipolar Disorder | Autism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Mclean HospitalNot yet recruitingObesity | Appetitive BehaviorUnited States
-
Yi YangNot yet recruiting
-
Mclean HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRecruitingSchizophrenia | Schizo Affective DisorderUnited States
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesUnknownBorderline Personality Disorder
-
University of AlbertaRecruitingDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantCanada