TMS for Exposure Therapy Resistant OCD (TETRO)

May 15, 2022 updated by: O.A. van den Heuvel, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Patients With Exposure Therapy-resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD): TETRO - a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TETRO is a multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months in 250 adult (18 years and older) OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP, aiming to establish the cost-effectiveness of low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the pre-SMA (compared to sham rTMS to the pre-SMA) as adjuvant treatment to exposure with response prevention (ERP). The treatment consists of 4 times/week rTMS combined with ERP for at least 5 weeks (20 sessions), with optional extension phase of 1 or 2 weeks (maximum of 28 sessions in total).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a serious and disabling mental disorder, characterized by obsessions and compulsions and associated with substantial comorbidity and morbidity (Stein et al. 2019). Approximately 50% of patients treated with standard treatments (exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) with/without medication) fail to respond fully, resulting in chronicity and poor participation in social and educational/occupational domains. We propose to fill the gap between the standard treatments (exposure therapy with/without medication) on the one side and invasive end-stage strategies (brain surgery) on the other side, using a non-invasive alternative: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Despite proven efficacy (Zhou et al. 2017; Rehn et al. 2018; Fitzsimmons et al. 2022), rTMS for OCD is not yet covered by the Dutch insurance system while rTMS for treatment resistant depression is. This multi-center randomized controlled trial, supported by the 'veelbelovende zorg' grant of Zorg Instituut Nederland (ZIN), aims to establish the added value of rTMS applied over the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) when combined with ERP in OCD patients, who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication). In case of proven cost-effectiveness it will lead to the addition of rTMS as insured health care for patients with OCD.

Objective: assess the (cost-)effectiveness of 1Hz rTMS to the pre-SMA as adjuvant treatment to ERP in OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication)

Study design: multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months

Study population: 250 adult (18 years and older) OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP

Intervention (if applicable): Low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the pre-SMA (compared to sham rTMS to the pre-SMA) as adjuvant treatment to ERP, 4 times/week for at least 5 weeks (20 sessions), with optional extension phase of 1 or 2 weeks (maximum of 28 sessions in total)

Main study parameters/endpoints: the pre-versus-post-treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) in severity of OCD (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale - Y-BOCS), version 2. The post-treatment Y-BOCS score will be obtained at the end of treatment, i.e, after 20, 24 or 28 sessions.

Secondary study parameters/endpoints:

  • Response (≥35% reduction on Y-BOCS-v2) and remission (Y-BOCS≤12) as established through international expert opinion
  • Standard Mean Difference (SMD) on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale
  • Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale
  • Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
  • Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
  • Depression, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up. In addition we will administer a visual analogue scale (VAS) for depression at these same time points, plus every week during treatment, to monitor the effects of treatment on severity of depressive symptoms.
  • Anxiety, measured using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and a VAS; following the same procedure and rationale as for depression.
  • Tolerability of the treatment and side effects, using an in-house questionnaire

Exploratory outcomes and/or influencing factors:

  • Patient adherence to treatment protocol, as measured using the Patient Exposure and Response Prevention Adherence Scale (PEAS)
  • Difference between responders and non-responders on circadian rhythm and sleep disorders at baseline as defined by the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (HSDQ).
  • Structural brain network characteristics (using T1 and diffusion weighted scans) to predict treatment response / relapse.
  • Functional resting-state and task-based (during emotional processing) brain network characteristics (using echo-planar imaging) to predict treatment response / relapse.
  • Variation in the exact stimulation location as ascertained and recorded by neuronavigation in relation to treatment outcome.
  • Contribution of demographic and clinical variables (sex, age, medication status) and pre-existing comorbidities (i.e. comorbid tics, depression, anxiety, autism) to the variance in treatment outcome.
  • In OCD patients with comorbid tics: tic severity, measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS).
  • Variation in treatment expectancy (7-items credibility and expectancy questionnaire (CEQ)) and blinding success (1-item question 'in which condition do you think you were?') in relation to treatment outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1081 HZ
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • O A van den Heuvel, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OCD as current primary diagnosis
  • Age 18 and older
  • Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score of 16 or higher.
  • Insufficient response to state-of-the art exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) and/or drop-out from ERP due to extreme anxiety/avoidance
  • The following comorbid disorders are allowed (as long as OCD is the current primary diagnosis): depression, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, tic/Tourette's disorder, eating disorders, personality disorders, autism spectrum disorder (when this does not dominate the clinical profile, i.e. is not main diagnosis).
  • Commitment to actively undergo intensive exposure therapy (both supervised during ERP sessions, as well as unsupervised at home)
  • Unmedicated (for at least 8 weeks) or stable dosage of psychotropic medication (for at least 8 weeks), involving serotonergic antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, clomipramine). Other psychotropic medication that is allowed (provided dosage is stably established for at least 8 weeks): methylphenidate, mood stabilizers, antipsychotic drugs
  • Ability to participate in frequent treatment sessions (4 days/week, for 5 (or 6, or 7) weeks) at one of the 5 sites nearest to their home and/or work
  • Ability to participate in pre-treatment MRI session (for neuronavigation) at one of the 3 academic sites nearest to their home and/or work
  • Capacity for providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • OCD patients with hoarding as main symptom dimension
  • The following comorbid disorders (current diagnosis) are not allowed: psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder (when this dominates the clinical profile, i.e. is diagnosed as main disorder), substance use disorder
  • Active suicidal thoughts and intent to act on it
  • Chronic use of benzodiazepines is not allowed
  • Cochlear implant
  • (History of) epilepsy
  • Pregnancy
  • Extreme claustrophobia or metallic objects in or on the body, preventing from participation in MRI session
  • Space-occupying lesion on MRI
  • Previous rTMS treatment (for blinding reasons)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: real rTMS
verum rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
Other Names:
  • exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP)
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS
sham rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
Other Names:
  • exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
YBOCS-2
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment)
pre-versus-post-treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) in severity of OCD as measured with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (version 2)
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
response and remission
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
response: ≥35% reduction on Y-BOCS | remission: Y-BOCS≤12
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Standard Mean Difference (SMD) on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
global functioning
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
global improvement
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
quality of life
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
cost effectiveness
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
cost effectiveness
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 6 and 12 months follow-up
depression, measured through the Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
comorbid depression
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
anxiety, measured through the Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
comorbid anxiety
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Tolerability of the treatment and side effects, using an in-house questionnaire
Time Frame: after 1st and last week of treatment
tolerability and side effects
after 1st and last week of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
tic severity, measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS)
Time Frame: baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
tic severity (only in OCD patients with comorbid tics)
baseline (T0) versus directly post-treatment (5, 6 or 7 weeks post-baseline, dependent on duration of treatment) + 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021.0670 - NL78930.029.21

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3
Subscribe