Gastric Bypass With Different Lengths of the Bilipancreatic Limb (BPG-1)

October 16, 2023 updated by: Débora Acín, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

Randomized Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Gastric Bypass With Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs of 150 Centimeters (cm)/70 cm Versus(vs) 70/150 cm, Measuring the Length of the Common Limb

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, more than 25% of patients do not obtain the expected result.

There is no uniform technique to perform a LRYGB, but traditionally it was constructed using a long alimentary limb (AL) and a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL). There is no current consensus on the ideal length of the LRYGB limbs.

The distal gastric bypass at the expense of a longer biliopancreatic limb (LBPL-GB) could induce more excess of weight loss (EWL%), but with possible protein malnutrition depending on the length of the remaining common limb.

The aim of this study is compare a LBPL-GB (BPL 150cm, AL 70cm) with LAL-GB (BPL 70cm, AL 150cm).

PRIMARY OUTCOME: to evaluate if there are differences in weight loss. SECONDARY OUTCOME: to assess whether there are differences in both groups in remission of the most common comorbidities and in quality of life.

DESIGN: multicenter, prospective, randomized study in blocks (1:1), blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention, in patients with indication of RYGB for obesity (BMI>35 with associated comorbidity or BMI>40 with or without comorbidity, excluding those of BMI>50). Intervention: LRYGB type 1 (LAL-GB: 150cm ALand 70cm BPL) or type 2 (LBPL-GB: 70cm AL and 150cm BPL).

The expected result is that the patients with LBPL-GB present better EWL%, and higher remission of their comorbidities than the comparison group

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alicante
      • Denia, Alicante, Spain, 03700
        • Juan José Arroyo Martín
    • Barcelona
      • Mataró, Barcelona, Spain, 08301
        • Esther Mans Muntwyler
    • Madrid
      • Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain, 28942
        • Débora Acín Gándara

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with BMI 35-40 kg/m2 with associated medical problems (Diabetes Mellitus, Hipertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome) or 40-50 kg/m2 with or without associated medical problems, who comply with the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Spain (SECO and AEC)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General contraindications to kind of surgery
  • BMI > 50 kg/m2
  • Known drug or alcohol abuse
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification > III
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: RYGB TYPE 1 - LONGER ALIMENTARY LIMB (LAL-GB)
150 cm alimentary limb and 70 cm biliopancreatic limb
The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.
Other Names:
  • Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 150cm / 70cm
  • Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 70cm / 150cm
Active Comparator: RYGB TYPE 2 - LONGER BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB (LBPL-GB)
70 cm alimentary limb and 150 cm biliopancreatic limb
The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.
Other Names:
  • Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 150cm / 70cm
  • Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 70cm / 150cm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)
Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery
The Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) after surgery. (Preoperatory weight in kilograms - current weight in kilograms) / (preoperatory weight in kilograms) x 100
From baseline to five years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission or improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery

Remission or improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus after surgery, according to the Criteria of American Diabetes Association, Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.

Complete remission: HbA1c < 6% and normalization of fasting blood glucose (100 mg/dl) without medication during one year minimum. Partial remission: HbA1c 6-6.5% and fasting blood glucose between 100 and 125 mg/dl) without medication.

Prolonged remission: at least 5 years of remission. Improvement HbA1c < 7%, with pharmacological treatment. ADA criteria (American Diabetes Association)

From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission or improvement of Hypertension
Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery

Remission or improvement of Hypertension after surgery, according to the Criteria of the Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.

Complete remission: blood pressure (BP) <120/80 without medication Partial remission: systolic BP 120-140 mmHg and diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg without medication.

From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission of improvement of Dyslipidemia
Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery

Remission or improvement of Dyslipidemia after surgery, according to the Criteria of the Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) < 100 mg/dl, Triglycerides (TG) < 150 mg/dl, total cholesterol < 200 mg/dl, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) > 60 mg/dl.

From baseline to five years after surgery
Remission or improvement of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery

Remission or improvement of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome after surgery, according to the Criteria of the Spanish Obesity Surgery Society and Spanish Surgeon Association.

Number of apneic-hypopneic episodes/hour, recorded by polysomnography.

From baseline to five years after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life after surgery
Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery

Quality of life with the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (B.A.R.O.S) Scale.

The score range is from 0 to 6 if the patient doesn´t have comorbidities. The result varies depending on the score. Failed=0, regular=0-1.5, good=1.5-3, very good=3-4.5, excellent=4.5-6.

The score range is from 0 to 9 if the patient has some comorbidities. The result varies depending on the score. Failed=0-1, regular=1-3, good=3-5, very good=5-7, excellent=7-9.

We will measure it a year and 5 years after surgery.

From baseline to five years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 11, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 21, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb

Subscribe