Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage in Twin Pregnancies With Non-shortened Cervix

July 11, 2023 updated by: Hytham Atia, Zagazig University

The Value of Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage Against Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies With History of Preterm Birth and Non-shortened Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial is aimed to assess the protective value of prophylactic cervical cerclage against preterm birth in twin pregnancies with history of one or more preterm births without having cervical shortening in the current pregnancy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multiple pregnancies are high-risk pregnancies and usually associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, mainly due to preterm births. Preterm births occur in 50% of twin pregnancies and the mean gestational age for delivery is 35.3 weeks. Ten percent of all twin births take place before 32 weeks of gestation.1 Preterm births are responsible for more than 70% of all neonatal and infant deaths.2 Prematurity can have serious consequences for the child, such as hearing difficulties, vision impairment, learning disabilities, reduced IQ, and cerebral palsy. A cervical length of ≤25 mm in twin pregnancies is a good predictor of a spontaneous preterm birth when measured around 24 weeks of gestation.3,4 Numerous interventions have been attempted in order to prevent preterm births in twin gestations, but until now, no intervention has been effective. Use of cerclage in twin pregnancies is controversial. Some experts claim that placing a cervical cerclage could increase the risk of preterm births5, Fuchs and Senat6 concluded that cervical cerclage in asymptomatic twins did not reduce the risk of PTB. This conclusion came depending on small sample sized randomized trail done on less than 50 patients.7 Available meta-analytic data remained of limited value in view of the few and small clinical studies that were included.

Although the current meta-analyses indicate the lack of efficacy of cerclage in twin pregnancies, data from the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth indicated that roughly 10% of triplets and 1.3% of twins are still receiving cerclage.8 Some authors compared the efficacy of cerclage in twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies and showed that women with twin pregnancies who received cerclage might show beneficial obstetric outcomes similar to those of women with singleton gestations.9,10 Such practice is still in need for further validation by well-structured and powered randomized controlled trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sharkia
      • Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt, 44519
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amro El Nemr, M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mohamed Lashin, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-50 years.
  • Dichorionic twins.
  • History of ≥1 preterm birth.
  • Transvaginal sonographic cervical length is ≥25 mm at 14-20 weeks gestational age.
  • Asymptomatic.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Triplets and quadruplets.
  • Monochorionic twins.
  • Threatened/ inevitable miscarriage
  • Bulging membranes through the external os.
  • Extremes of age.
  • Major fetal anomalies.
  • Known cases with uterine anomalies e.g. bicornuate uterus, uterus didelphis… etc.
  • Fetal demise.
  • Fetal reduction in the current pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
cervical cerclage between 14 and 20 weeks will be done by one of the three authors. McDonald cervical cerclage.
McDonald cervical cerclage will be applied using Mersaline braided tape with double needle. Single stitch (4 bites) will be applied as close as possible to the level of internal os. The Knot will be put either anterior or posterior according to the surgeon desire.
No Intervention: Group B
Routine antenatal care without cerclage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of preterm birth at ≤35+6, ≤33+6, and ≤31+6 weeks.
Time Frame: immediately after delivery for study cases through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of preterm deliveries stratified according to gestational age groups mentioned
immediately after delivery for study cases through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of miscarriage.
Time Frame: immediately after occurrence of miscarriage through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of missed, inevitable and complete miscarriage less than 20 weeks
immediately after occurrence of miscarriage through study completion, an average of 1 year
Incidence of cervico-vaginal infection
Time Frame: once reported or confirmed during pregnancy through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of infections diagnosed by patient complaint, clinical examination and confirmed by culture and sensitivity
once reported or confirmed during pregnancy through study completion, an average of 1 year
Incidences of bad Neonatal outcomes in both groups
Time Frame: during early neonatal follow up through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of of neonates with respiratory distress, IVH, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, NICU admission
during early neonatal follow up through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amro El Nemr, Zagazig University
  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed Lashin, Zagazig University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 28, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm Birth

Clinical Trials on Cervical cerclage

Subscribe