PREEMPTİVE PARA-CERVİCAL BLOCK FOR POSTOPERATİVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY

February 21, 2023 updated by: Kemal GUNGORDUK, Erzincan Military Hospital

PREEMPTİVE PARA-CERVİCAL BLOCK FOR POSTOPERATİVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL

Total hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedure in gynecology. The laparoscopic route for the performance of hysterectomies are on the rise [1]. The laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) procedure has several advantages over open surgery such as better cosmetic outcomes, faster recovery earlier return to normal activities and work [1-3]. Nonetheless, postoperative pain (PP) remains an issue that scuppers these advantages [1-3].

The incidence of PP after TLH has been reported to vary from 35% to 63% [4,5]. The origin of PP after laparoscopy is multifactorial and complex such as perioperative predicaments, including pneumoperitoneum, stretching of the intraabdominal cavity, the blood left in the abdomen, and dissection of the pelvic region [6-7]. A randomized controlled trial has demonstrated that there may be more intense pain and greater analgesia requirements in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery than after laparotomy [8]. Further inquiry to intercept the advancement and decrease the severity of PP is prominent to further improve TLH.

Women undergoing TLH experience two different pain characteristics including incisional pain and visceral pain in the first hour after the operation [6]. These pains were most intense 30 min after TLH, gradually decreasing thereafter for postoperative 72 hr [6]. High levels of acute postoperative pain (APP) are pertain with an increment risk of chronic postsurgical pain so control of these acute pains in the urgent postoperative period is vital for faster amelioration.

Many attempts have been tried to control APP after THL, such as transverse abdominal plane blocks, superior hypogastric plexus block, local anesthetic injection to the port side, and reduced port caliber [9-12]. Para-cervical bloc (PCB) is believed to block the Frankenhouser nerve plexus that supplies the visceral sensory fibers to the uterus, cervix, and top of the vagina. Only two randomized studies have assessed the effect of PCB in THL, but several limitations such as the small sample size preclude drawing conclusions on PP after TLH. Thus, the primary goal of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate if PCB at the onset of surgery, as a part of enhanced recovery protocol, could improve patient recovery after THL.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mentese
      • Mugla, Mentese, Turkey, 48000
        • Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University Education and Research Hospital
    • Muğla
      • Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey, 48000
        • Kemal Güngördük

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Patients undergoing total type A laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without additional surgery, such as salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 18 years
  • refusal to provide consent
  • inability to understand the study questionnaire
  • severe psychiatric or mental disorder
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification > III
  • history of regular narcotic use within 6 months of the surgery
  • conversion to laparotomy
  • operation time > 90 min
  • Additional procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
Prior to starting surgery after general anesthesia, the 10 mL of normal saline was performed by the primary surgeon. The syringe was injected with 5 mL on each side into the cervical stroma at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 2 to 3 cm.
Block of inferior hypogastric plexus with local anesthetic
Experimental: Study
Prior to starting surgery after general anesthesia, thE 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine was performed by the primary surgeon. The syringe was injected with 5 mL on each side into the cervical stroma at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 2 to 3 cm.
Block of inferior hypogastric plexus with local anesthetic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analog scale (VAS) pain score
Time Frame: up to 1 hour after the procedure
1 h postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score
up to 1 hour after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the quality of postoperative recovery
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure
the quality of postoperative recovery according to the QoR-40 questionnaire scores at 24 hours after the surgical procedure
Up to 24 hours after the procedure
faces pain scale-revised score
Time Frame: up to 2,4,6,12 hours after the procedure
Faces pain scale-revised score is an objective method of pain assessment in which facial expressions of the patient are assessed by the investigator
up to 2,4,6,12 hours after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MUGLA-6

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Para-cervical block

Subscribe