Validity of an AI-based Program to Identify Foods and Estimate Food Portion Size (PortionSizeAI)

November 14, 2023 updated by: Chloe, Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Testing the Validity of an Artificial Intelligence-based Program to Identify Foods and Estimate Food Portion Size Among Adults, a Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to test the accuracy of the Nutrition Artificial Intelligence in the Openfit app during meals in a controlled laboratory setting

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

For this pilot study, using a convenience sample, the investigators will recruit up to 25 adults to use the Nutrition AI technology in Openfit to identify and estimate portion size of foods plated in a laboratory setting at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC) and/or Louisiana State University (LSU). Laboratory members within the Ingestive Behavioral Laboratory will also test the ability of Nutrition AI to identify foods and to quantify foods provided in the laboratory. Meals will be simulated, and participants will not consume the foods provided.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70808
        • Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 62 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • Aged 18-62 years
  • Self-reported body mass index (BMI) 18.5-50 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition or circumstance that could impede study completion
  • Unfamiliar with or not able to use an iPhone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
  • Training and use of Openfit
  • Using the app to estimate food intake from simulated meals in a laboratory at PBRC or LSU (participants will not eat food during the meals)
  • Rating the usability and satisfaction of the app
For this pilot study, using a convenience sample, the investigators will recruit up to 25 adults to use the Nutrition AI technology in Openfit to identify and estimate portion size of foods provided in a laboratory setting at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC) and/or Louisiana State University (LSU). Laboratory members within the Ingestive Behavioral Laboratory will also test the ability of Nutrition AI to identify foods and to quantify foods provided in the laboratory. Meals will be simulated, and participants will not consume the foods provided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of Food Plated Using the Openfit Mobile App
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Agreement surrounding identification of food and beverages provided compared with known identification, at the item level, and across all items where identification is determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

For a food identified through the Nutrition AI to be considered an exact food match, the name of the food identified must match or be a close match to the food served. For example, a fruit cocktail identified as a fruit salad is an acceptable match. Proportions will be used to assess whether the percentage of food items plated that were correctly identified by Nutrition AI is different to the percentage of foods correctly identified by a criterion method (human rater). Descriptive data will also be used to describe the frequency at which food plated was correctly identified for all food items across all participants. In total there was 255 food items tested across all participants.

One study visit of ~2 hours
Portion Size Estimation (kcal) of Food Plated Using the Openfit Mobile App
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Error between mean estimates of food plated (kcal) and known food plated (kcal), determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of food plated from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).

One study visit of ~2 hours
User Satisfaction of the Openfit Mobile App for Recording Food Plated
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

After completing assessment of food plated, participants will complete a user satisfaction survey (USS). The USS was adapted from a previous version used to assess the usability of a mobile application for dietary assessment. The USS includes five quantitative questions and three open response questions. The quantitative questions will each be scored using a 6-point Likert scale, with 1 being the lowest and worst score, and 6 being the highest and best score.

Data for each of the five quantitative responses in the USS will be averaged across participants and presented separately as mean (SD). Open responses will be evaluated using qualitative methods to identify common themes.

One study visit of ~2 hours
Usability of the Openfit Mobile App for Recording Food Plated
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours
Participants will complete the Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSUQ). The CSUQ is frequently used to assess the usability of mobile applications. The CSUQ consists of 19 questions, each scored using a 7-point Likert scale (with 1 being the lowest and best score and 7 being the highest and worst score) and participants will rate satisfaction, usefulness, information quality, and interface quality of the Openfit app. The average of these 19 questions (1 being the best average score and 7 being the worst average score) provides an overall usability score.
One study visit of ~2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of plate waste using the Openfit mobile app
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Agreement surrounding identification of plate waste compared with known identification, at the item level, and across all items, where identification is determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

For a food identified through the Nutrition AI to be considered an exact food match, the name of the food identified must match or be a close match to the food served. For example, a fruit cocktail identified as a fruit salad is an acceptable match. Proportions will be used to assess whether the percentage of food items that were correctly identified by Nutrition AI is different to the percentage of foods correctly identified by a criterion method (human rater). Descriptive data will also be used to describe the frequency at which plate waste was correctly identified.

One study visit of ~2 hours
Portion size estimation (gram weight) of plate waste using the Openfit mobile app
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Error between mean estimates of portion weights (gram weight) and known portion weights (gram weight), where estimates of plate waste are determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of plate waste from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).

One study visit of ~2 hours
Portion size estimation (kcal) of plate waste using the Openfit mobile app
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Error between mean estimates of portion size (kcal) and known portion size (kcal), where estimates of plate waste are determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of plate waste from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).

One study visit of ~2 hours
User Satisfaction of the Openfit mobile app for recording plate waste
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

After completing assessment of plate waste, participants will complete a user satisfaction survey. The investigators adapted a 10-question user satisfaction survey that has been administered in prior studies to quantify satisfaction, ease of use, and adequacy of training for mobile apps.

Responses to the user satisfaction questionnaire will be assessed using frequencies and percentages for Likert scale data. Open responses will be evaluated using qualitative methods to identify common themes.

One study visit of ~2 hours
Portion size estimation (gram weight) of food intake using the Openfit mobile app
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Error between mean estimates of portion weights (gram weight) and known portion weights (gram weight), where estimates of food intake (food plated - plate waste) are determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of food intake from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).

One study visit of ~2 hours
Portion size estimation (kcal) of food intake using the Openfit mobile app
Time Frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

Error between mean estimates of food intake (kcal) and known food intake (kcal), where estimates of food intake (food plated - plate waste) are determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of food intake from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).

One study visit of ~2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chloe P Lozano, PhD, Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PBRC 2022-011
  • T32DK064584 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Any identifiers might be removed from the participants identifiable information and after such removal, the information could be used for future research studies or given to another investigator for future research without additional informed consent from the subject or legally authorized representative.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nutrition Assessment

Clinical Trials on PortionSize AI

3
Subscribe