A Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Presendin in IIH (IIH EVOLVE)

March 26, 2024 updated by: Invex Therapeutics Ltd.

A Phase III Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Clinical Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Presendin in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has significant associated morbidity and reduced quality of life. There is a significant risk of visual loss and patients also typically suffer with chronic disabling headaches.

This trial has been designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of exenatide (Presendin) in the reduction of intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with IIH.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients will be provided with training on the self-administration of the trial medication from the site trial co-ordinator.

A 1-week screening period will be followed by a 24-week randomised double-blind treatment period in which patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive a subcutaneous (SC) dose of either Presendin (containing 2 mg of exenatide [active group]) or matching placebo (placebo group), self-administered once weekly.

At the end of the randomised treatment period (Week 24), all patients will have an end-of-treatment clinic visit. Five weeks after the end-of-treatment visit, an end-of-trial safety follow-up telephone visit will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia, 2170
        • Liverpool Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
        • Sydney Eye Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Kent Town, South Australia, Australia, 5056
        • Vision SA
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • Alfred Health - The Alfred Centre
      • Bonn, Germany, 53105
        • University Hospital Bonn
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Universitatsklinikum Freiburg
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitaetsmedizin Mainz
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • University Hospital Muenster, Department Ophthalmology Clinical Trials in Ophthalmology (CTO)
      • Haifa, Israel, 3109601
        • Rambam Medical Center
      • Haifa, Israel, 3339419
        • Bnai Zion Medical Center
      • Holon, Israel, 5822012
        • The Edith Wolfson Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 9103102
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Center - Ein Karem
      • Tiberias, Israel, 1528001
        • Pade Medical Center (Poriya)
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 0624
        • New Zealand Clinical Research (Aukland)
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2GW
        • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust - Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • UCHealth Sue Anschutz-Rodgers Eye Center - Anschutz Medical Campus
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine (UMMSM) - Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota Health
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10075
        • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt Eye Institute
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77074
        • Neuro-Eye Clinical Trials, Inc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years at the time of consent.
  2. Diagnosis of new IIH by consensus criteria, including normal structural brain imaging (excluding features of raised ICP and incidentalomas), including either magnetic resonance venography or computed tomographic venography to exclude thrombosis and no evidence of a secondary causes of raised ICP.
  3. Newly diagnosed patients with screening commenced no more than 4 weeks after the diagnostic LP.
  4. Lumbar puncture opening pressure ≥25 cm cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at diagnosis.
  5. Presence of bilateral papilloedema (Frisén grade ≥1). Verification of papilloedema by the OCT Reading Centre. Where there is uncertainty fundus photography and/or ultrasound scan (B scan) of the optic nerves should be conducted for evaluation by the Independent Adjudication Committee (IAC).
  6. Perimetric Mean Deviation defined as between -2 to -7 decibels (dB) in at least one eye. Eyes meeting this criterion will defined as 'study eyes'.
  7. Reproducible visual loss present on automated perimetry including no more than 15% false positive responses (reliability confirmed by the Visual Field Reading Centre) in study eyes.
  8. Two or more headache days over the 7-day period prior to screening and also the patient must meet this criterion during the 7-day screening period.
  9. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and must agree to use a highly effective birth control method (failure rate less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly) during the whole trial duration including the last follow-up visit (12 weeks after ceasing drug). Female patients who are lactating must agree to stop breast-feeding OR Female patients of non-childbearing potential (defined as pre-menopausal females with a documented tubal ligation or hysterectomy; or post-menopausal females defined as 12 months of amenorrhoea [in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulation hormone 25-140 IE/L and oestradiol <200 pmol/L is confirmatory]).
  10. Male patients with a female partner of childbearing potential must commit to practice methods of contraception (e.g., condom, vasectomy) and abstain from sperm donation during the trial including the last follow-up visit (12 weeks after ceasing drug). Their partners, if they are women of childbearing potential, must agree to practice contraception and to use a highly effective method of contraception during the trial, including the last follow-up visit (12 weeks after ceasing drug).
  11. Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

IIH-related exclusion criteria:

  1. Presence of venous sinus thrombosis on brain imaging by either magnetic resonance or computerised tomographic venography.
  2. Previous IIH surgery including CSF shunt, optic nerve sheath fenestration or dural venous sinus stent or sub-temporal decompression.
  3. Previous bariatric surgery within the last 3 months or intention during the trial.
  4. Abnormal neurological examination (aside from papilloedema and consequent visual loss or sixth or seventh nerve palsy or palsies).
  5. Treatment to lower ICP within 1 week prior to screening visit (e.g., acetazolamide, topiramate [including if used as a migraine preventative], diuretics, glucocorticoids [I.V., injectable steroids or oral (including dexamethasone and prednisolone)]). Nasal, inhaled, or topical steroids are allowed.
  6. Use of any drugs known to cause intracranial hypertension, including exposure to fluoroquinolones, lithium, vitamin A, or tetracyclines within 2 months prior to diagnostic LP.

    Vision-related exclusion criteria:

  7. Any disease other than refractive error that causes visual loss in the study eyes. Where there is uncertainty this would be determined by the IAC.
  8. Refractive error worse than +/- 6.00 sphere or worse than +/- 3.00 cylinder in study eyes. In addition, participants with myopia of worse than -6.00 D sphere but less than or equal to -8.00 D sphere are eligible if the subject wears a contact lens for all perimetry examinations with the appropriate correction.
  9. Inability to perform a reliable visual field examination as deemed by the Visual Field Reading Centre in the study eyes. Where there is uncertainty this would be evaluated by the IAC.

    Headache-related exclusion criteria:

  10. Does not complete ≥6 days of electronic/paper trial diary during the 7-day screening period.

    Other exclusion criteria:

  11. Untreated previously diagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea with historically recorded apnoea-hypopnea index greater than 15.
  12. Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist within last 4 weeks prior to screening.
  13. COVID-19 vaccine within 2 weeks prior to screening.
  14. Allergy/known hypersensitivity to the active substance and/or excipients of the investigational product.
  15. Has known contraindications to glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (e.g., ketoacidosis, severe gastrointestinal disease, pancreatitis, renal impairment) which may affect the safety of the patient.
  16. Using any glucose-lowering medication.
  17. Currently taking warfarin.
  18. Alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥2x the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin ≥1.5x ULN, or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥1.5 ULN at screening. Note - patients with elevated total bilirubin are not excluded if they meet criteria for Gilbert's syndrome, including: bilirubin is predominantly indirect (with normal direct bilirubin level); and ALT, AST and ALP ≤1x ULN).
  19. Kidney disease (as defined by serum cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate <55 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated at investigator site).
  20. Any of the following abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests at screening, as assessed by the central laboratory and confirmed by a single repeat, if deemed necessary: Haemoglobin <10 g/dL (<100 g/L); Platelet count <75 x 10⁹/L (<75,000/mm³).
  21. Using recreational or illicit drugs at the time of signing the informed consent, or recent history (within the last year) of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition criteria, that in the opinion of the investigator puts the patient at risk.
  22. Is unable to self-administer the trial medication (or unable to administer trial medication with support) after receiving training during the screening period.
  23. History of any clinically significant disease or disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial or influence the results or the patient's ability to participate in the trial.
  24. Any contraindication to lumbar puncture procedure in the opinion of the investigator.
  25. Has participated in any other interventional trial within 1 month prior to the screening visit.
  26. Is pregnant or breastfeeding.

Note: Use of headache preventative medication is allowed at enrolment (except for topiramate). Changes to headache preventative medication during the trial should be made in consultation with the IAC.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo is supplied as 2 parts (visually identical to the Presendin vial and pre-filled diluent syringe). The drug part will exclude the active pharmaceutical ingredient (exenatide acetate) and the diluent part will be the same as the active treatment diluent. The drug part is suspended in the diluent part solution and administered SC as a suspension.
Experimental: Presendin
2.0 mg
Presendin is supplied as 2 parts, one vial consisting of a drug part (white or greyish white powder in a clear vial) and one pre-filled syringe containing the diluent part (colourless liquid). The drug part is suspended in the diluent part solution and administered SC as a suspension.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ICP From Baseline to Week 24 Measured by Lumbar Puncture (LP), Where a Higher LP Value Indicates Greater ICP
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
ICP was measured by LP (opening pressure) using an LP manometer; Baseline and Week 24 ICP values (measured in cm CSF) are presented for each subject. A standard operating procedure was followed by all study sites for all study-related ICP measurements by LP.
Baseline to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perimetric Mean Deviation (PMD), Measured by Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) Analysis (24-2 SITA-Standard), Where a Larger Negative Result Indicates Greater Visual Loss
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Baseline to Week 24
Papilloedema by Change in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness, With a Greater Thickness of RNFL Indicating Greater Swelling and Greater Extent of Papilloedema
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Baseline to Week 24
Papilloedema by Percent Change in Optic Nerve Head Size, Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Where a Larger Optic Nerve Head Size Reflects Greater Swelling and a Greater Extent of Papilloedema
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Baseline to Week 24
The Number of Monthly Headache Days (MHD)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24

Monthly headache days (according to daily headache diary) = number of days recorded in a 28-day window where data were collected on >7 days and where ≥1 headache on a day met the following criteria:

  • Onset, continuation, or recurrence of headache
  • Any severity or phenotype of headache
  • Lasts at least 30 minutes

Baseline headache frequency was calculated over the 7 days prior to the randomization visit; ≥5 days of headache data were needed to obtain a valid baseline value. The number of headache days recorded for a period were linearly scaled by the total number of days of data collected in the period for each subject to give the MHD during the baseline period (linearly scaled to a maximum of 28 days) and the last 28-day period during which data were collected on >7 days for each subject prior to study completion or discontinuation.

Period 1 = Weeks 1-4 Period 2 = Weeks 5-8 Period 3 = Weeks 9-12 Period 4 = Weeks 13-16 Period 5 = Weeks 17-20 Period 6 = Weeks 21-24

Baseline to Week 24
Number of Moderate to Severe MHD
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24

Moderate to severe (m-s) MHD (according to daily headache diary) = number of days recorded in a 28-day window where data were collected on >7 days and where ≥1 headache on a day met the following criteria:

  • Severity was of moderate or severe pain and lasted at least 4 hours or,
  • Required acute headache analgesics

Baseline m-s headache frequency was calculated over the 7 days prior to the randomization visit; ≥5 days of headache data were needed to obtain a valid baseline value. The number of m-s headache days recorded for a period were linearly scaled by the total number of days of data collected in the period for each subject to give the m-s MHD during the baseline period (linearly scaled to a max 28 days) and the last 28-day period during which data were collected on >7 days for each subject prior to study completion or discontinuation.

Period 1 = Weeks 1-4 Period 2 = Weeks 5-8 Period 3 = Weeks 9-12 Period 4 = Weeks 13-16 Period 5 = Weeks 17-20 Period 6 = Weeks 21-24

Baseline to Week 24
Number of MHD Responders (Defined as a ≥50% Reduction in MHD)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
A subject was considered a responder if they had at least a 50% reduction in MHD from baseline to Week 24. Subjects who dropped out prior to Week 24 were considered non-responders.
Baseline to Week 24
Number of Moderate to Severe MHD Responders (Defined as a ≥50% Reduction in Moderate to Severe MHD)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
A subject was considered a responder if they had at least a 50% reduction in moderate to severe MHD from baseline to Week 24. Subjects who dropped out prior to Week 24 were considered non-responders.
Baseline to Week 24
Headache Severity
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24

Headache severity was assessed by a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), 0-10 where 0 = no pain and 10 = most severe pain. Severity of headaches was assessed on days where a headache occurred. Headache free days were not counted. Baseline headache severity was calculated over the 7 days prior to the randomization visit; at least 5 of 7 days of headache severity data had to be recorded by the subject to obtain a valid baseline value.

  • 28-day period 1 = Weeks 1-4
  • 28-day period 2 = Weeks 5-8
  • 28-day period 3 = Weeks 9-12
  • 28-day period 4 = Weeks 13-16
  • 28-day period 5 = Weeks 17-20
  • 28-day period 6 = Weeks 21-24
Baseline to Week 24
Use of Acute Headache Analgesic Medications (Acute Headache Analgesics in Days Per Month)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24

Number of days recorded in a 28-day window, where at least one dose of an acute headache analgesic was recorded.

The baseline acute headache analgesic use was calculated over the 7 days prior to the randomization visit; at least 5 of 7 days had to be recorded by the subject to obtain a valid baseline value.

The number of acute headache analgesic use days was linearly scaled for each subject to give the number of acute headache analgesic use days during the baseline period and the last 28-day period during which headache data were collected on more than 7 days for each subject prior to study completion or discontinuation.

  • 28-day period 1 = Weeks 1-4
  • 28-day period 2 = Weeks 5-8
  • 28-day period 3 = Weeks 9-12
  • 28-day period 4 = Weeks 13-16
  • 28-day period 5 = Weeks 17-20
  • 28-day period 6 = Weeks 21-24
Baseline to Week 24
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Corrected visual acuity will be recorded using a Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) scoring chart, with a range of -0.3 to 1.00, where a lower score indicates better visual acuity.
Baseline to Week 24
Number of Patients With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Treatment failure is defined as the initiation of either medical therapy or a surgical intervention to lower ICP during the study.
Baseline to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

3
Subscribe