Gold Factor on Knee Joint Health and Function

July 11, 2022 updated by: 4Life Research, LLC

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Microscopic Doses Oral Administration of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) on Knee Joint Health and Function

The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether gold nanoparticles (AuNP) supplement holds clinical value in improving joint health, function, and quality of life for arthritis patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether gold nanoparticles (AuNP) supplement holds clinical value in improving knee joint health, function, and quality of life for arthritis patients. A total of 51 participants were followed for 20 weeks through a three phase longitudinal study. Both subjective and objective parameters were used to measure and monitor changes in knee joint health and function, as well as quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63122
        • Professional Athletic Orthopedics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 87 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 and <87 years of age
  • Having arthritis
  • Suffering from chronic knee pain
  • Failed treatments to date - including surgery, Physical Therapy, NSAIDs
  • Must agree to maintain the same eating, exercise, and sleep arrangements for the whole duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having bacterial, intra-articular, or knee infections
  • Had any knee related partial or complete total knee replacement within 3 months prior to the start of the study
  • Had recent (3 months prior to start of the study) knee injection
  • Currently on NSAIDs
  • currently pregnant or lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Phase 1: double-blinded placebo-controlled Supplement vs Placebo
Phase 1 (8 weeks): Supplement and Placebo groups ingested 3 oz of Supplement and Placebo per day respectively for the first four weeks as a loading dose, and then switched to 2 oz per day for weeks 5 - 8. This phase was double-blinded.
AuNP used in the study is an aqueous suspension of clean-surfaced, faceted gold nanoparticles that have extraordinary catalytic capabilities. AuNP were 8 - 28 nm in diameter, with varying shapes from bipyramids to polyhedrons. To avoid contamination, AuNP was suspended in ultra-pure water, and were not coated with any proteins or molecules to avoid negative reactions within living tissues. This resulted in a rose-pink color due to the incident light inducing a specific resonance known as the localized surface plasmon resonance. The AuNP supplement used in this study contains elemental gold at 6 ppm. Study dosage is 1 oz per day, which is about 0.17 mg elemental gold per day.
Other Names:
  • AuNP Supplement
For the Placebo, water and red dye were mixed to create a placebo liquid with the same rose-pink shade as the AuNP supplement, along with flavoring that matched the AuNP supplement.
NO_INTERVENTION: Washout Phase
Phase 2 (4 weeks): Both groups underwent a month-long "wash out" period, during which they did not ingest any of the Supplement or Placebo. This lasted from weeks 9-12. This phase was not double-blinded as all participants and the researchers were aware of the wash-out procedure.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Phase 3: Supplement
Phase 3 (8 weeks): Both groups took the Supplement at 3 oz per day as a loading dose for four weeks (weeks 13 - 16), and then 2 oz per day for the final four weeks (weeks 17 - 20). This phase was open labeled, as all participants and the researchers were aware that all participants were ingesting the Supplement.
AuNP used in the study is an aqueous suspension of clean-surfaced, faceted gold nanoparticles that have extraordinary catalytic capabilities. AuNP were 8 - 28 nm in diameter, with varying shapes from bipyramids to polyhedrons. To avoid contamination, AuNP was suspended in ultra-pure water, and were not coated with any proteins or molecules to avoid negative reactions within living tissues. This resulted in a rose-pink color due to the incident light inducing a specific resonance known as the localized surface plasmon resonance. The AuNP supplement used in this study contains elemental gold at 6 ppm. Study dosage is 1 oz per day, which is about 0.17 mg elemental gold per day.
Other Names:
  • AuNP Supplement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Pain score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function & Daily Living, Sports & Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Symptoms score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function & Daily Living, Sports & Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Function in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function & Daily Living, Sports & Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Function in Sports and Recreation score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function & Daily Living, Sports & Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Quality of Life score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The KOOS survey was chosen due to its repeatability, and it gave scores of 0-100 for four separate categories: Symptoms, Pain, Function & Daily Living, Sports & Recreational Activities, and Quality of Life. Under KOOS scoring guidelines, a score of zero represents extreme knee problems, and 100 represents complete function of the knee with no pain, discomfort, or other joint related problems.
20 weeks
C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: 20 weeks
C-Reactive Protein levels were measured at T0 for baseline scores, and then measured again at T1, T2, and T3. As CRP levels are biomarkers of systemic inflammation, it was expected to see a decrease in CRP levels when taking AuNP Supplement.
20 weeks
Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Leg Press repetition number
Time Frame: 20 weeks
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
6-minute Walk distance (meter)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Sit-to Stand repetition number
Time Frame: 20 weeks
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks
Single Leg Squats repetition number
Time Frame: 20 weeks
All participants completed a physical assessment conducted by an assigned physical therapist: Range of Motion Bilateral Flexion, Leg Press, Walk Test, Sit-to Stand and Single Leg Squats.
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Event for Loss of Balance (LOB)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
DorsaVi Assessments: Loss of Balance (LOB), Movement efficiency index, Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation, Squat Lateral Shift Deviations, single leg squat scores, speed, and tibial inclination
20 weeks
Movement efficiency index
Time Frame: 20 weeks
DorsaVi Assessments: Loss of Balance (LOB), Movement efficiency index, Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation, Squat Lateral Shift Deviations, single leg squat scores, speed, and tibial inclination
20 weeks
Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
DorsaVi Assessments: Loss of Balance (LOB), Movement efficiency index, Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation, Squat Lateral Shift Deviations, single leg squat scores, speed, and tibial inclination
20 weeks
Squat Lateral Shift Deviation score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
DorsaVi Assessments: Loss of Balance (LOB), Movement efficiency index, Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation, Squat Lateral Shift Deviations, single leg squat scores, speed, and tibial inclination
20 weeks
single leg squat speed
Time Frame: 20 weeks
DorsaVi Assessments: Loss of Balance (LOB), Movement efficiency index, Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation, Squat Lateral Shift Deviations, single leg squat scores, speed, and tibial inclination
20 weeks
single leg squat tibial inclination
Time Frame: 20 weeks
DorsaVi Assessments: Loss of Balance (LOB), Movement efficiency index, Squat Lumbar Flexion Deviation, Squat Lateral Shift Deviations, single leg squat scores, speed, and tibial inclination
20 weeks
Percentage of participants that would continue taking the product after the study ended.
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Acceptability of AuNP Supplement was analyzed at the end of the study. Participants were asked if they would continue taking the product after the study in their final exit survey.
20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard C Lehman, MD, Professional Athletic Orthopedics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 3, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Gold Factor (Gold Nanoparticles, AuNPs)

Subscribe