Effectiveness of Sodium Fusidate Ointment Compared to Petrolatum for Wound Healing Following Cauterization

April 29, 2022 updated by: Firman Parrol, Indonesia University

Effectiveness of Sodium Fusidate Ointment Compared to Petrolatum for Wound Healing Following Cauterization: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

A double-blind within person randomized controlled trial study was conducted on 90 wounds in 22 subjects. All wounds were randomized to receive either sodium fusidate ointment or petrolatum following cauterization.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All eligible participants were randomized to be applied sodium fusidate ointment (intervention) or white petrolatum (control) on the lesions on their face with 1:1 ratio. Allocation sequence was generated by a statistician with a computer and it was concealed from the researchers and participants. The ointment was prepared and packaged by a pharmacist. Each pot was numbered in accordance with the allocation sequence.

Electrosurgery was carried out using Ellman® Surgitron. Prior to the cauterization, we performed infiltration anesthesia around the lesion with Pehacain® (containing 20 mg of lidocaine and 0.0125 mg/ml epinephrine). The tissue was cleaned using sterile gauze or a cotton swab that had been moistened with 0.9% NaCl. Following electrosurgery, sodium fusidate ointment or petrolatum was applied to the wound according to the allocation sequence. The patient also received a wound care instruction sheet. This sheet contained information on how to wash the face or body properly, how to apply the ointment properly, what to avoid after procedure (rubbing the wound excessively, use make up, sweating excessively, and use other topical agents on the wound), and follow-up instructions (on the 3rd, 7th, and 14th day). Each subject was given two or four pots of ointment that should be applied twice daily on the wound.

Wound monitoring, which includes erythema, edema, crusting, re-epithelialization, total wound healing score, pus, and subjective symptoms was performed on the 3rd, 7th, and 14th day. Erythema scores was also monitored immediately after electrosurgery. Monitoring can be done 1 day earlier or later than schedule in some cases since the wound healing phase is expected still the same. Clinical grading of each site was carried out using a 5-point analog scale for erythema, edema, crusting, re-epithelialization, and total wound healing score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Dermatology and Venereology Clinic, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age over 20 years
  • clinically diagnosed with seborrheic keratosis or acrochordon
  • having minimum of two lesions and maximum of four lesions with diameter of 4-10 mm on face or neck and minimum distance between lesions of 5 cm
  • providing consent to participate into the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a skin bacterial infection on the other parts of body's skin
  • benign tumor lesions with inflammation or secondary infection
  • history of antibiotics use in the last 2 weeks or long-acting penicillin injections within the past 1 month
  • history of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants use in the past 2 weeks
  • using a pacemaker
  • infected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Sodium fusidate ointment
Electrosurgery was carried out using Ellman® Surgitron. The tissue was cleaned using sterile gauze or a cotton swab that had been moistened with 0.9% NaCl. Following electrosurgery, sodium fusidate ointment was applied to the wound according to the allocation sequence. The patient also received a wound care instruction sheet. Each subject was given two or four pots of ointment that should be applied twice daily on the wound.
Sodium fusidate 2% topical ointment was applied twice daily on the wound after cauterization for 14 days.
Other Names:
  • Fucidin ointment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Petrolatum
Electrosurgery was carried out using Ellman® Surgitron. The tissue was cleaned using sterile gauze or a cotton swab that had been moistened with 0.9% NaCl. Following electrosurgery, petrolatum was applied to the wound according to the allocation sequence. The patient also received a wound care instruction sheet. Each subject was given two or four pots of ointment that should be applied twice daily on the wound.
Petrolatum ointment was applied twice daily on the wound after cauterization for 14 days.
Other Names:
  • Vaseline album

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound healing score
Time Frame: 14 days
Wound healing score was calculated based on the erythema, edema, crusts, and reepithelization. Wound healing score is as follows: 0-4 = very good/healed, 5-8 good/healed, 9-12 moderate/not healed, and 13-16 = poor/not healed
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erythema
Time Frame: 14 days
Skin erythema around the wound, assessed with physical examination. Erythema score is as follows: 0 = no erythema, 1 = mild erythema (25%), 2 = moderate erythema (50%), 3 = severe erythema (75%), and 4 = very severe erythema (100%)
14 days
Edema
Time Frame: 14 days
Edema on the wound area, assessed with physical examination. Edema score is as follows: 0 = no edema, 1 = mild edema (25%), 2 = moderate edema (50%), 3 = severe edema (75%), and 4 = very severe edema (100%)
14 days
Crusts
Time Frame: 14 days
Presence of crusts on the surface of the wound, assessed with physical examination. Crusts score is as follows: 0 = none, 1 = a few (1-30%), 2 = moderate (31-60%), 3 = a lot (61-90%), and 4 = generalized (91-100%)
14 days
Reepithelization
Time Frame: 14 days
Improvement of the wound characterized by decreasing size and depth of the wound, assessed with physical examination. Reepithelization score is as follows: 0 = complete (91-100%), 1 = good (61-90%), 2 = moderate (1-30%), and 4 = poor (0% or widening of the wound)
14 days
Incidence of infection
Time Frame: 14 days
Presence of wound infection, established by findings of pain, erythema, edema, and poor reepithelization
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Firman Parrol, MD, Indonesia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seborrheic Keratosis

Clinical Trials on Sodium Fusidate 2 % Topical Ointment

Subscribe