Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Bacterial Gene Markers (M3) for Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia (M3-PRO)

August 26, 2024 updated by: Louis Ho Shing Lau, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Prospective Cross-sectional Multi-center Study to Assess the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Bacterial Gene Markers (M3) for Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia

The investigators aim to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and the novel panel of bacterial gene markers (Fn, m3, Ch and Bc) collectively named as M3, in detecting colorectal advanced neoplasia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the one of the most common cancers in Hong Kong with more than 5,500 new cases annually. There is prevailing evidence of increasing trend of young onset CRC globally. Early detection and resection of pre-malignant colorectal neoplasia has shown to reduce CRC-related mortality.

Non-invasive stool tests including guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are the cornerstones of population-based CRC screening programmes. The major limitation of this widely used strategy is its unsatisfactory sensitivities for CRC (79%) and advanced adenomas (AA; 40%). The sensitivity for non-advanced adenomas is even lower than 10%. A large proportion of advanced and non-advanced adenomas will be missed by FIT alone. Therefore, identification of alternative non-invasive test with better sensitivity to detect colorectal neoplasia is warranted.

Multitarget stool DNA test and faecal microbial DNA markers appear to be promising options for CRC screening. Several bacterial gene markers have been identified by metagenome sequencing and reported to be associated with CRC, including Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch) and Bacteroides clarus (Bc). However, these molecular markers had low accuracy in distinguishing adenomas from normal tissue. Recently, a new Lachnoclostridium gene marker (labelled as 'm3') has been shown to have high diagnostic yield for the detection of colorectal adenomas. In a case-control study of 1012 subjects, a linear increasing trend of m3 level was observed from fecal samples of healthy subjects to those with adenomas and cancers. The overall sensitivity of m3 was significantly higher than FIT in detecting all adenomas (48% vs 9.3%), AA (50.8% vs 16.1%) and non-advanced adenomas (44.2% vs 0%). The diagnostic accuracy of m3 could be further enhanced by combining with a panel of fecal microbial markers composing of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Bacteroides clarus (Bc), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch) for CRC (82.3%) and adenomas (64.2%). We hypothesized that the combination of these 4 bacterial gene markers (known as M3) is more sensitive than FIT in detecting colorectal advanced neoplasia.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Louis Lau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects with average risk of colorectal neoplsia requring screening/surveillance colonoscopy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. They require elective colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or polyp surveillance, or investigation of symptoms (e.g. anemia, change of bowel habit, abdominal pain);
  2. Aged ≥18 years old;
  3. Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to colonoscopy (e.g. perforation, intestinal obstruction, unstable cardiopulmonary status);
  2. Contraindication to polyp resection (e.g. active gastrointestinal bleeding, uninterrupted anticoagulation or dual antiplatelets);
  3. Known colorectal cancer or adenoma for staged procedure;
  4. Previous colonic resection;
  5. Personal history of colorectal cancer;
  6. Personal history of polyposis syndrome;
  7. Personal history of inflammatory bowel disease;
  8. Known pregnancy or lactation;
  9. Advanced comorbid conditions (defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 or above);

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Colorectal neoplasia screening/surveillance cohort
Subjects with average risk of colorectal neoplasias requiring screening/surveillance colonoscopy
A kind of stool test
Other Names:
  • Bacterial gene marker test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of bacterial gene markers panel (M3)
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with one of more advanced neoplasia detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with one of more advanced neoplasia detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of M3 for early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of M3 for advanced adenomas
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with one or more advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of M3 for all adenomas
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with all advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of M3 for sessile serrated lesions (SSL)
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with SSLs detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for advanced adenomas
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with one or more advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for all adenomas
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with all advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for sessile serrated lesions (SSL)
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with SSLs detected in the index colonoscopy.
1 month
Specificity
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of true negative results of M3/FOBT/FIT among those with no adenoma detected in colonoscopy
1 month
Positive predictive value (PPV)
Time Frame: 1 month
The ratio of subjects truly diagnosed as positive to all those who had positive test results
1 month
Negative predictive value (NPV)
Time Frame: 1 month
The ratio of subjects truly diagnosed as negative to all those who had negative test results
1 month
Overall diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: 1 month
The proportion of correctly classified subjects among all subjects
1 month
Microbiota changes in subjects with adenomas or normal findings after polypectomy
Time Frame: 1 month
Microbiota change measured by qPCR or metagenomic sequencing
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Fecal immunochemical test (FIT)

Subscribe