- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05413174
Contribution of Hypnosis in Guided Hepatic Biopsy (Ap-Hy-PBH) (Ap-Hy-PBH)
Contribution of Hypnosis in Guided Hepatic Biopsy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contribution of hypnosis on the level of pain felt by the patient during ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy, by comparing an intervention group (hypnosis) to a control group (routine and benevolent care).
Single-center randomized controlled trial.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hepatic Biopsy Puncture (HBP) is a very useful procedure for the assessment of chronic liver disease as well as in certain acute situations, and is also essential in oncology for the histological diagnosis of primary and secondary focal lesions. A study on the prevalence and characteristics of induced pain shows that it is a pain-generating procedure for 84% of patients and that the combination of anxiolytics and local anesthesia is insufficient. The effect of relaxing therapies was evaluated during percutaneous interventional radiology procedures. Anxiety and pain measured with visual analogue scales were significantly reduced in the group receiving support from sophrology and hypnosis . The mean evaluation of anxiety per procedure was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.48-2.82) in the group receiving relaxation therapy compared with 5.94 (95% CI, 4.62-7.22) in the other group. The mean level of pain felt was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.23-2.78) for the accompanied procedures versus 4.16 (95% CI, 2.53-6.04) without accompaniment. However, this study did not specifically look at percutaneous liver biopsy, and moreover the relaxation technique used was based on sophrology and not on an Ericksonian hypnosis approach.
Data concerning the use of hypnosis during percutaneous liver biopsies are limited to clinical cases, which report an absence of pain felt, including an observation in a patient who did not receive local anesthesia because of a history of allergy to Lidocaine.
Training in attentive and benevolent patient care already allows this type of procedure to be performed under good conditions in our department. This training of about one hour, carried out internally, does not require specific means. It would therefore seem useful to see what the impact is of using Ericksonian hypnosis, a recognized and risk-free technique which would require longer specific training for the staff and would represent a cost.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75015
- AP-HP
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an indication for ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy
- Over 18 years of age
- Affiliated to a social security system
Exclusion Criteria
- History of psychiatric pathology, psychotropic or anxiolytic treatments
- Refusal to participate.
- People who do not understand and/or speak French.
- People who are deaf
- Patients with impaired cognitive abilities, evaluated by the prescribing service
- Disorders of hemostasis against percutaneous approach
- Allergy to Lidocaine
- Patient under National Health Aids
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hypnosis arm
The experimental group will receive an hypnosis session during the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
Use of Ericksonienne hypnosis in the medical field, aiming to dissociate the patient from the intervention in order to modify his or her perception of pain and limit anxiety. Ericksonienne hypnosis will use during ultrasound-guided biopsy in radiology ward. |
|
No Intervention: Habitual Care
The control group will receive the usual medical management during the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between groups of pain level during ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
Time Frame: day 1
|
maximal pain level feel (in a scale from 0 to 10, 0 means : no pain ; 10 means :maximal pain) during the process of ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between groups of anxiety level during the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy
Time Frame: day 1
|
Maximal anxiety level feel (in a scale from 0 to 10, 0 means : no anxiety ; 10 means : maximal anxiety) during the process of ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
day 1
|
|
Difference between groups of pain level one hour after the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
Time Frame: day 1
|
maximal pain level feel (in a scale from 0 to 10, 0 means : no pain ; 10 means :maximal pain) one hour following the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
day 1
|
|
Pain killer consumption
Time Frame: day 2
|
Consumption of analgesic in the 24 hours following the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy (type of drug and cumulative doses).
|
day 2
|
|
Acceptability of another guided hepatic biopsy
Time Frame: day 2
|
Acceptability of another ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy (in a scale from 0 to 10, 0 means : totally refuse ; 10 means : accept without hesitation).
This outcome will be collected 24 hours following the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
day 2
|
|
Difference between groups of anxiety level before the ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy
Time Frame: day 1
|
Maximal anxiety level feel (in a scale from 0 to 10, 0 means : no anxiety ; 10 means : maximal anxiety) before the process of ultrasound-guided hepatic biopsy.
|
day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Véronique NITSCHE, RN, APHP
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Eisenberg E, Konopniki M, Veitsman E, Kramskay R, Gaitini D, Baruch Y. Prevalence and characteristics of pain induced by percutaneous liver biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2003 May;96(5):1392-1396. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000060453.74744.17.
- Alexander JA, Smith BJ. Midazolam sedation for percutaneous liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Dec;38(12):2209-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01299897.
- Kendrick C, Sliwinski J, Yu Y, Johnson A, Fisher W, Kekecs Z, Elkins G. Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2016;64(1):75-115. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2015.1099405.
- Bertrand AS, Iannessi A, Buteau S, Jiang XY, Beaumont H, Grondin B, Baudin G. Effects of relaxing therapies on patient's pain during percutaneous interventional radiology procedures. Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(4):455-462. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.07.02. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
- Adams PC, Stenn PG. Liver biopsy under hypnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Sep;15(2):122-4. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199209000-00008.
- Hauser W, Hagl M, Schmierer A, Hansen E. The Efficacy, Safety and Applications of Medical Hypnosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Apr 29;113(17):289-96. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0289.
- Lindor KD, Bru C, Jorgensen RA, Rakela J, Bordas JM, Gross JB, Rodes J, McGill DB, Reading CC, James EM, Charboneau JW, Ludwig J, Batts KP, Zinsmeister AR. The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1996 May;23(5):1079-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230522.
- Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. [Practices of transcutaneous liver biopsies in France. Results of a retrospective nationwide study]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2001 Jan;25(1):77-80. French.
- Castera L, Negre I, Samii K, Buffet C. Patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation provides safe and effective analgesia for percutaneous liver biopsy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1553-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03776.x.
- Froehlich F, Lamy O, Fried M, Gonvers JJ. Practice and complications of liver biopsy. Results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Aug;38(8):1480-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01308607.
- Faymonville ME, Laureys S, Degueldre C, DelFiore G, Luxen A, Franck G, Lamy M, Maquet P. Neural mechanisms of antinociceptive effects of hypnosis. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1257-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00013.
- Barat M, Ollivier C, Taibi L, Nitsche V, Sogni P, Soyer P, Parlati L, Dohan A, Abdoul H, Revel MP. Standard of care versus standard of care plus Ericksonian hypnosis for percutaneous liver biopsy: Results of a randomized control trial. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2025 Mar;106(3):93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- APHP220124
- 2022-A00008-35 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-guided Hepatic Biopsy
-
Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul,...RecruitingProstate Biopsy | Post Biopsy Bleeding | Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate BiopsySouth Korea
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingEfficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy Using Dynamic Wet TechniqueEgypt
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruitingLiver Biopsy | Image-guided BiopsyKorea, Republic of
-
Tarsus UniversityWithdrawnTRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSYTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of California, DavisNot yet recruitingBiopsy | EUS Guided Biopsy | Diagnosis of a Pancreaticobiliary DisorderUnited States
-
Tanta UniversityUnknownConventional Caudal Block | Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block | Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block | Pediatric Hip SurgeryEgypt
-
Modarres HospitalCompletedComplications | Image-guided Biopsy | Kidney GlomerulusIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Tongji HospitalNot yet recruitingUltrasound-guided Regional AnesthesiaChina
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalRecruitingUltrasound-guided Neuraxial ProceduresSingapore