- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05414110
Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Right Ventricular Function Assessed by Transthoracic Echocardiography
June 7, 2022 updated by: Wuhan Union Hospital, China
Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation(APRV) on Right Ventricular Function Assessed by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Effects of APRV on right ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by transthoracic echocardiography
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Detailed Description
Effects of APRV on right ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) by transthoracic echocardiography,which includes TAPSE, S' by TDI, RV FAC, tricuspid regurgitation,RVEDA/LVEDA,RV, Velocity time integration(VTI) of the left ventricular outflow tract blood flow.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
50
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: xin zhao, master
- Phone Number: 027-85351607 15927336285
- Email: 619641364@qq.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: xiaojing zou, PhD
- Phone Number: 027-85351607 13995518630
- Email: 249126734@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
- Recruiting
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
-
Contact:
- xin zhao, master
- Phone Number: 027-85351607 15927336285
- Email: 619641364@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Include as many eligible study populations as possible by study protocol
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who meet the 2012 Berlin ARDS diagnostic criteria and undergo invasive mechanical ventilation
- PEEP≥5cmH2O, oxygenation index≤200mmHg
- Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation time <48h
- Age ≥18 years old and ≤80 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Aged less than 18 years old or older than 80 years old
- Obese patients with BMI≥35kg/m2;
- Pregnant and lactating women
- The expected time of invasive mechanical ventilation is expected to be less than 48h
- Neuromuscular disease known to require prolonged mechanical ventilation
- Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Intracranial hypertension
- Bullae or pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, mediastinal emphysema
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO) has been performed when entering the ICU
- Refractory shock
- Severe cardiac dysfunction (New York Heart Association class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmia), right heart enlargement due to chronic cardiopulmonary disease, cardiogenic shock or heart enlargement postoperative;
- Failure to sign informed consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Right ventricular area fractional change (RV FAC)
Time Frame: RV FAC monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
Right ventricular area fractional change (RV FAC)is a simple and repeatable ultrasound method for evaluating RV function.
Methods: The RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and RV end-systolic area (RVESA) were measured on the apical four-chamber section by two-dimensional ultrasound.
RV FAC=(RVEDA- RVESA)/RVEDA*100%.
|
RV FAC monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
|
Tricuspid annular systolic displacement(TAPSE)
Time Frame: TAPSE monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
TAPSE:TAPSE is one of the most effective ultrasound methods for evaluating right ventricular function.Measurement method: TAPSE was measured on the four-chamber section of the apex of the heart by M-mode ultrasound.
the sampling line was placed at the side wall of the tricuspid valve ring, parallel to the free wall of the right ventricle as far as possible, and the displacement of the tricuspid valve ring was measured from the end of diastole to the end of systole.
|
TAPSE monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
|
Tricuspid annular systolic S' velocity (TS')
Time Frame: TS' monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
TS' is an objective and accurate ultrasound technique for evaluating right ventricular function.Measurement method:The sample volume was applied to the free wall of the RV and the peak velocity of tricuspid annulus motion was measured in the four-chamber section of the apex by tissue doppler imaging (TDI).
|
TS' monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
|
Right ventricular end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA)
Time Frame: RVEDA/LVEDA monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
RVEDA/LVEDA a simple and repeatable ultrasound method for evaluating dynamics changes of RV function.Methods:
The RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and left ventricular(LV) end-systolic area (LVEDA) were measured on the apical four-chamber section by two-dimensional ultrasound.
|
RVEDA/LVEDA monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
|
Pulmonary circulatory resistance (PVR)
Time Frame: PVR monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
Increased PVR can lead to deterioration of RV function.Pulse Doppler imaging (PWD) was used to obtain the pulmonary artery flow spectrum from the pulmonic valve on the short axial section of the parasternal great vessels.
|
PVR monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: HR monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended
|
HR is a basic element of hemodynamic index
|
HR monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended
|
|
Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: SBP monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended
|
SBP is basic element of hemodynamic index
|
SBP monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended
|
|
Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
Time Frame: MAP monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended
|
MAP represents peripheral organ perfusion pressure
|
MAP monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended
|
|
cardiac output (CO)
Time Frame: CO monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
CO is an important parameter to reflect the cardiac function of patients
|
CO monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
|
Stroke volume (SV)
Time Frame: SV monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
Stroke volume is the amount of blood that the ventricle shoots out during a single heart beat.
|
SV monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
|
28-day mortality
Time Frame: Day 28 after study entry
|
28-day mortality after study entry
|
Day 28 after study entry
|
|
The number of days in ICU
Time Frame: From the day subjects entered ICU to the day left ICU(up to 90 days)
|
The number of days in ICU(up to 90 days)
|
From the day subjects entered ICU to the day left ICU(up to 90 days)
|
|
The number of days in hospital
Time Frame: From the day subjects entered hospital to the day left hospital including death(up to 90 days)
|
The number of days in hospital(up to 90 days)
|
From the day subjects entered hospital to the day left hospital including death(up to 90 days)
|
|
in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: From the day patients admitted to hospital to the day death or discharge(up to 90 days)
|
Any death occurred during hospitalization(up to 90 days)
|
From the day patients admitted to hospital to the day death or discharge(up to 90 days)
|
|
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
Time Frame: Within 2 hours admission to ICU and 24 hours after inclusion in the study
|
The higher the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA) score, the higher the disease risk factor and the higher the mortality rate(The highest score is 24, while the lowest score is 0).
|
Within 2 hours admission to ICU and 24 hours after inclusion in the study
|
|
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score
Time Frame: Within 2 hours admission to ICU and 24 hours after inclusion in the study
|
The higher the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE II) score, the higher the disease risk factor and the higher the mortality rate(the highest score is 71, while the lowest score is 0).In particular, the accuracy of group patient prediction is high.
|
Within 2 hours admission to ICU and 24 hours after inclusion in the study
|
|
the effect of APRV ventilation time on right ventricular area fractional change (RV FAC) in ARDS patients
Time Frame: RV FAC monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
The RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and RV end- systolic area (RVESA) were measured on the apical four-chamber section by two-dimensional ultrasound.
RV FAC=(RVEDA- RVESA)/RVEDA*100%.
|
RV FAC monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
|
the effect of APRV ventilation time on tricuspid annular systolic displacement (TAPSE) in ARDS patients.
Time Frame: TAPSE monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
TAPSE was measured on the four-chamber section of the apex of the heart by M-mode ultrasound.
the sampling line was placed at the side wall of the tricuspid valve ring, parallel to the free wall of the right ventricle as far as possible, and the displacement of the tricuspid valve ring was measured from the end of diastole to the end of RV systole.
|
TAPSE monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
|
the effect of APRV ventilation time on tricuspid annular systolic S' velocity in ARDS patients.
Time Frame: Tricuspid annular systolic S' velocity monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
Tricuspid annular systolic S' velocity is an objective and accurate ultrasound technique for evaluating right ventricular function.Measurement method:The sample volume was applied to the free wall of the RV and the peak velocity of tricuspid annulus motion was measured in the four-chamber section of the apex by tissue doppler imaging (TDI).
|
Tricuspid annular systolic S' velocity monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
|
the effect of APRV ventilation time on right ventricular end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA) in ARDS patients.
Time Frame: RVEDA/LVEDA monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
RVEDA/LVEDA:RVEDA/LVEDA a simple and repeatable ultrasound method for evaluating dynamics changes of RV function.Methods:
The RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and LV end-systolic area (lVEDA) were measured on the apical four-chamber section by two-dimensional ultrasound.
|
RVEDA/LVEDA monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: xiaojing zou, PhD, Wuhan Union Hospital, China
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Zhang H, Huang W, Zhang Q, Chen X, Wang X, Liu D; Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group. Prevalence and prognostic value of various types of right ventricular dysfunction in mechanically ventilated septic patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jul 13;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00902-9.
- Boissier F, Katsahian S, Razazi K, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Leon R, Vivier E, Brochard L, Vieillard-Baron A, Brun-Buisson C, Mekontso Dessap A. Prevalence and prognosis of cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1725-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2941-9. Epub 2013 May 15.
- Dong D, Zong Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Jing C. Mortality of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome subjected to lung protective ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
- Mekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, Begot E, Repesse X, Legras A, Brun-Buisson C, Vignon P, Vieillard-Baron A. Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4141-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
- Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Right ventricular function and positive pressure ventilation in clinical practice: from hemodynamic subsets to respirator settings. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep;29(9):1426-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1873-1. Epub 2003 Aug 9. No abstract available.
- Sun X, Liu Y, Li N, You D, Zhao Y. The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18586. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018586.
- Zhou Y, Jin X, Lv Y, Wang P, Yang Y, Liang G, Wang B, Kang Y. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1648-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 3, 2022
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
February 15, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
February 15, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 7, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
June 10, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 10, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 7, 2022
Last Verified
June 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- TTEC20220103
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on ARDS
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandAZUREA groupCompleted
-
West China HospitalCompleted
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompleted
-
Southeast University, ChinaActive, not recruiting
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Hamilton Medical AGTerminated
-
Southeast University, ChinaUnknown
-
University of TorontoSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Unity Health TorontoCompleted
-
Southeast University, ChinaRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruiting