Evolution of the Quality of Life and Experience of Young Women With Utero-vaginal Aplasia (MRKHPSY) (MRKHPSY)

November 17, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Changes in the Quality of Life and Experience of Young Women With Utero-vaginal Aplasia (MRKHPSY)

This study aims to evaluate the global evolution of the quality of life on patients diagnosed with MRKH syndrome (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser), 8 to 10 years after the first research.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Between 2012 and 2015, the French national reference center for rare gynecological pathologies (PGR) has conducted a study with 2 axis: a medical and a psychological section (clinical trial number NCT01911884).

The medical axis's aim was to compare the global and sexual quality of life of MRKH patients according to the mode of care (surgical or non-surgical) for vaginal aplasia. A total of 131 patients, with a mean age of 26.5 (±5.5) years old, were recruited for the study.

The quality of life was assessed considering 3 quality of life scales: global (WHOQOL-BREF) and sexual (FSFI and FSDS-R).

Quality of life scores and vaginal depth were compared and revealed that the surgery was not superior to self-dilation, whether in terms of quality of life or anatomical results. In addition, surgery was associated with complications in half of the cases. It should be mentioned that the overall quality of life of all 131 patients was similar to that of the general population, but significantly impaired in the psychosocial dimension in the younger patients. Notably, the quality of sexual life was not impaired with FSFI scores similar to those of the general population, but there was a profound sexual distress in nearly 71% of patients according to FSDS-R scores.

The psychological component of this initial research (called T1) focused specifically on the psychological, and more widely on the psychosocial, impact of the diagnosis of utero-vaginal aplasia in adolescent girls. 40 patients out of the 131 in the medical component participated (the first 40 contacted to participate in the medical component research). The results revealed a real experience of disability, and unexpectedly, addictive reactionary disorders (anorexia/bulimia or sport addiction), and an overrepresentation of heterosexual orientation compared to the general population. The absence of a uterus led to severe moral suffering regarding projections of access to biological motherhood.

This new research (called T2) involves the same population as T1 with the object of making each patient her own witness.

The purpose of the current study is to assess the evolution of this suffering, 8 to 10 years after the T1 study, using the same methodology as the previous study. The investigators hope to find an improvement in quality of life, a disappearance of addictive disorders and possibly a more vivid, but painful expression due to age, of the desire for motherhood, even if the uterus transplant is a source of hope.

Finding predictive factors of psychosocial difficulties would allow teh investigators to improve care practices, mainly psychological, which could also benefit other women with a rare disease affecting their sexuality and/or fertility.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Necker Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient who participated in the initial T1 psychological component of the previous study (MRKH protocol)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged of 18 years old or older
  • Patient who participated in the initial T1 psychological component of the previous study (MRKH protocol)

Exclusion Criteria

- Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of global quality of life
Time Frame: Day 0
Evaluated by the World Health Organization Quality Of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Socio-professional integration
Time Frame: Day 0

Socio-professional integration based on professional integration criteria. The potential consequences of this malformation on socio-professional integration are also diagnosed during the semi-directive clinical consultation and with the quality of life scale:

- Total score WHOQOL-BREF

Day 0
Socio-professional integration
Time Frame: Day 0

Socio-professional integration based on professional integration criteria. The potential consequences of this malformation on socio-professional integration are also diagnosed during the semi-directive clinical consultation and with the quality of life scale:

- item 18 score (How satisfied are you with your capacity for work?)

Day 0
Socio-professional integration
Time Frame: Day 0

Socio-professional integration based on professional integration criteria. The potential consequences of this malformation on socio-professional integration are also diagnosed during the semi-directive clinical consultation and with the quality of life scale:

-qualitative components mentioned during the clinical consultation regarding education and socio-professional integration

Day 0
Sexual quality of life
Time Frame: Day 0
Sexual quality of life is assessed by two sex life self-questionnaires (Female Sexual Function Index FSFI and Female Sexual Dysfunction Scale-Revised FSFD).
Day 0
Addictive behavioural disorders
Time Frame: Day 0
Description : Addictive behavioural disorders are diagnosed during the semi-directive clinical consultation. The semi-directive clinical consultation aims to promote the production of a speech by the patient on a given theme. This will be about the evolution of the personal history when the diagnosis was announced and the medical and/or surgical consequences that this diagnosis induced.
Day 0
Desire for motherhood
Time Frame: Day 0
The desire for motherhood is identified during the semi-directive clinical consultation.
Day 0
The modalities to access to maternity
Time Frame: Day 0
The modalities to access to maternity is identified during the semi-directive clinical consultation with three items: adoption, surrogacy, uterus transplantation;
Day 0
Modalities of their psychic functioning
Time Frame: Day 0

by the semi-directive clinical interview and the Rorschach&TAT with 13 variables:

  • Adaptation to reality
  • Type of anxiety:castration, loss of object, fragmentation, intrusion
  • Body image and characteristics of human responses :whole, partial, blurred, attacked
  • Self-representation:solid/fragile
  • Capacity to deploy conflictual scenarios
  • Female identification capability
  • Access to ambivalence
  • Modalities of thought investment: quality of laboration of the modes of apprehension: good/inadequate
  • Quality of psychic functioning and defensive range: flexible and adapted/rigid and adapted/flexible and inadapted/rigid and inadapted
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alaa CHEIKHELARD, Doctor
  • Study Director: Karinne Gueniche, MD, PhD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mrkh Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

Subscribe