Telemedicine Management of Hypertension

April 25, 2024 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Telemedicine Management of Hypertension: A Pre-Implementation Study

Explore barriers, facilitators, acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of the telemedicine management of hypertension intervention

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of the current study is to conduct pre-implementation work to understand the determinants of the telemedicine management of hypertension intervention implementation, feasibility of the intervention and its tailoring, and explore potential inequitable implementation factors in African American patients to enhance the intervention's usability to inform future hybrid trial design.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria Patients:

  • > 18 years of age
  • diagnosis of Hypertension (HTN)
  • systolic Blood Pressure > 140mmHg on last two clinic visits
  • stable anti-HTN medication in the preceding six weeks
  • possess smart phone
  • must speak and read English

Exclusion Criteria Patients:

  • conditions that diminish the ability to conduct home-based self-assessments of Blood Pressure
  • chronic conditions that add complexity in HTN management
  • recent acute health changes that increases likelihood of Blood Pressure instability
  • terminal illness

Inclusion Criteria Stakeholders:

  • identify stakeholders using Mendelow's stakeholder matrix, which helps recognize stakeholders according to their interest and power in using the intervention in their clinic - Stakeholders are from clinic and community health workers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telemedicine Management of Hypertension
using home blood pressure monitoring
Telemedicine Management of high blood pressure using home blood pressure monitoring and telemedicine based hypertension self- management support and pharmacotherapy. This will be supplemented by support from community health workers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of Intervention (AIM)
Time Frame: Month 3
Acceptability will be assessed using mixed methods from both patients and stakeholders. The study team will derive themes from relevant constructs about implementation acceptability using qualitative interviews. The study team will complement this using a quantitative measure, Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which is a validated four item generic implementation outcome measures to assess implementation acceptability. Embedded mixed methods will allow alignment in results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide context, complementarity, and convergence.
Month 3
Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM)
Time Frame: Month 3
Appropriateness will be assessed using mixed methods from both patients and stakeholders. The study team will derive themes from relevant constructs about implementation appropriateness using qualitative interviews. The study team will complement this using a quantitative measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), which is a validated four item generic implementation outcome measures to assess implementation appropriateness. Embedded mixed methods will allow alignment in results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide context, complementarity, and convergence.
Month 3
Feasibility of Intervention (FIM)
Time Frame: Month 3
Feasibility will be assessed using mixed methods from both patients and stakeholders. The study team will derive themes from relevant constructs about implementation feasibility using qualitative interviews. The study team will complement this using a quantitative measure, Feasibility Intervention Measure (FIM), which is a validated four item generic implementation outcome measures to assess implementation feasibility. Embedded mixed methods will allow alignment in results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide context, complementarity, and convergence. As an additional feasibility outcome, the study team will assess the proportion of eligible and screened patients who agree to participate as well as those who decline (with reasons).
Month 3
Fidelity of Intervention/implementation
Time Frame: Month 3
The study team will assess implementation fidelity both at the provider level (number of contacts between patients and nurses; number of pharmacologic activations) and at the patient level (number of home blood pressure data transferred).
Month 3
Cost Estimates
Time Frame: Month 3
The study team will estimate cost by calculating the numbers of clinic staff needed and the time spent (by provider type) per patient as well as other resources required for implementation. The study team will document resource commitment (e.g., staff time by provider type [nurses, advanced practice providers, physicians, community health workers], equipment, support [investigative team's support for device set-up, technical and implementation help]) for cost assessments. The study team will stratify cost related to the intervention and implementation strategy.
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yashashwi Pokharel, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00085682

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Telemedicine Management of Hypertension

Subscribe