Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Therapy for Chronic Pain (FAMILIA)

Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Imagery, and Listening Interventions for Analgesia (FAMILIA)

The purpose of the study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two music interventions delivered through telehealth for chronic musculoskeletal pain. This pilot study evaluates outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, pain and associated outcomes) in a single-component, minimally interactive music listening (ML) intervention and a multi-component, more interactive music imagery (MI) intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

FAMILIA is a 3-arm, parallel group, pilot trial. Sixty Veterans will be randomized to one of three conditions: MI, ML, or usual care. Aim 1 is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component, interactive MI intervention (8-weekly, individual sessions) and a single-component, minimally interactive ML intervention (independent music listening). Feasibility metrics related to recruitment, retention, engagement, and completion of treatment protocol and questionnaires will be assessed. Up to 20 qualitative interviews will be conducted to assess Veteran experiences with both interventions, including perceived benefits, acceptability, barriers, and facilitators. Interview transcripts will be coded and analyzed for emergent themes. Aim 2 is to explore the effects of MI and ML versus usual care on pain and associated patient-centered outcomes. These outcomes and potential mediators will be explored through changes from baseline to follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 4 months. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe outcomes; this pilot study is not powered to detect differences in outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Recruiting
        • Roudebush VA Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic (> 6 months) musculoskeletal pain of at least moderate severity (≥5 on 0-10 numeric scale)
  • Access to a personal computer, tablet computer, and/or smartphone,
  • Ability to pass technology assessment screen, and
  • Not currently receiving music therapy services

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious or unstable medical (e.g., Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) or psychiatric illness (e.g., psychosis, mania) or housing insecurity that could compromise study participation,
  • Suicidal ideation with current intent/plan,
  • Hearing or cognitive impairment that may interfere with music listening or abstract thinking needed for imagery work,
  • Lack access to a personal computer, tablet computer, and/or smartphone,
  • Unable to pass technology assessment screen, or
  • Currently receiving music therapy services.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Music Imagery
MI sessions will be delivered by board-certified music therapists with specialized training in MI and the study treatment protocol.The 8-session protocol has two stages. Stage 1 (sessions 1-4) is focused on learning to use music and imagery for self-regulation. Once the Veteran has demonstrated skill in using music for self-regulation, Stage 2 (sessions 5-8) shifts to identify and deepen their inner resources and how they can use those resources for self-care.
Up to 30 participants will be randomized to receive 8 weekly Music Imagery sessions over 8-12 weeks.
Other Names:
  • music therapy
Experimental: Music Listening
Following a one-time meeting with a music therapist, an electronic playlist will be compiled for the Veteran to listen to during the 12-week treatment period.
Up to 15 participants will be randomized to independent music listening.
Other Names:
  • music therapy
No Intervention: Usual care
Participants in the usual care arm (as is the case for MI and ML groups) may receive analgesics and non-pharmacological treatments (e.g., physical therapy) for their chronic musculoskeletal pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of contacted and eligible Veterans consent to study participation, attend intervention sessions, and complete the treatment protocol and scheduled outcome assessments?
Time Frame: at 3 months
Determine the feasibility of the music therapy interventions
at 3 months
Aspects of the interventions do Veterans perceive to be most/least helpful or most/least liked?
Time Frame: at 3 months
Assess participant acceptability of the music therapy interventions
at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale for Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
assessment of severity of pain, scored 0 to 10 with higher scores representing more intense pain
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
Brief Pain Inventory - Pain interference subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
how does pain interfere with 7 activities, scored 0 to 10 with higher scores representing more interference of pain with activities
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
assessment of pain belief, scored 0 to 12 with higher scores representing more pain catastrophizing (worse outcome)
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
Centrality of Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
assessment of pain coping, scored 10 to 50 with higher scores representing the belief that pain is central to individual's life (worse outcome)
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time Frame: 1,3 and 4 months
assessment of treatment response, scored 1 to 7 with higher scores representing greater improvement from starting the intervention
1,3 and 4 months
PROMIS Sleep Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
assessment of sleep quality, scored 1 to 5 with higher scores representing worse sleep quality (worse outcome)
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
PHQ-9 Depression Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
assessment of depression severity, scored 0 to 27 with higher scores representing more severe depression (worse outcome)
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
GAD-7 Anxiety Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
assessment of anxiety severity, scored 0 to 21 with higher scores representing more severe anxiety (worse outcome)
Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
assessment of stress severity, scored 0 to 14 with higher scores representing more severe stress (worse outcome)
Baseline and 3 months
EQ 5D Scale for Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
assessment of generic health-related quality of life, higher scores represent improved quality of life
Baseline and 3 months
EQ 5D Scale for Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
assessment of generic health-related quality of life, scored 0 to 100 with higher scores represent improved quality of life (better outcome)
Baseline and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Bair, Roudebush VA Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Maya Story, Roudebush VA Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1863501-22-C-20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Music Imagery

Subscribe