Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Spasticity in People With Spinal Cord Injury

March 23, 2026 updated by: Nathan Hogaboom, PhD, Kessler Foundation

Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Spasticity in Chronic SCI: A Pilot Study

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience a host of secondary complications that can impact their quality of life and functional independence. One of the more prevalent complications is spasticity, which occurs in response to spinal cord damage and the resulting disruption of motor pathways. Common symptoms include spasms and stiffness, and can occur more than once per hour in many people with SCI. Spasticity can have a negative impact over many quality of life domains, including loss of functional independence, activity limitations, and even employment. Its impact on health domains is also pronounced, with many people who have spasticity reporting mood disorders, depression, pain, sleep disturbances, and contractures. Spasticity can interfere with post-injury rehabilitation and lead to hospitalization. There are many treatments for spasticity in this population. However, many do not have long-term efficacy, and, if they do, they are often pharmacological in nature and carry side effects that could limit function or affect health. The goal of this pilot, randomized-controlled study is to investigate the potential efficacy and safety of a non-invasive treatment with a low side effect profile, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). ESWT has shown some benefits in people with post-stroke spasticity with no long term side effects. Thirty individuals with chronic, traumatic SCI will be recruited. Fifteen will be provided with ESWT while the other fifteen will be given a sham treatment. Clinical and self-report measures of spasticity and its impact on quality of life will be collected, as well as quantitative ultrasound measures of muscle architecture and stiffness. The ultimate goal of this pilot project is to collect the data necessary to apply for a larger randomized-controlled trial. Conducting a larger trial will allow for a more powerful estimation of safety and efficacy of ESWT as a treatment for spasticity in people with SCI.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
        • Kessler Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years of age or older.
  2. Have a non-progressive traumatic SCI (complete or incomplete) with residual neurological deficits that occurred greater than 1 year prior to their enrollment.
  3. MAS score of 2 or greater in the gastrocnemius of the treated limb.
  4. Can be treated with shockwaves. Contraindications include current or recent (within the past 3 months) infection at the site of treatment and severe coagulopathies (e.g. hemophilia).164
  5. No change in antispasmodic medications within the past three months or intended changes over the course of the trial.
  6. Participant is able and willing to comply with the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of surgical procedures of the lower extremity.
  2. Ankle contracture.
  3. Sever, inflammatory arthritic diseases.
  4. Thrombosis.
  5. Anticoagulant medications.
  6. Pregnancy.
  7. Cancer.
  8. Recent history of local injection of botulinum toxin within 6 months, or phenol/alcohol with 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
This group will receive a focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment (three applications over three weeks), applied to the spastic medial gastrocnemius.
Shockwaves are high pressure sound waves that interact with tissues to elicit a biological response. The shockwave probe will be placed on the skin with ultrasound gel and the muscle will be stimulated for a few minutes.
Other Names:
  • Storz Medical DUOLITH SD1 Ultra modular system
Sham Comparator: Control
This group will go through the same procedures as the intervention group, but the shockwave device will not touch their skin and thus they will receive no therapeutic effect.
Shockwaves are high pressure sound waves that interact with tissues to elicit a biological response. The shockwave probe will be placed on the skin with ultrasound gel and the muscle will be stimulated for a few minutes.
Other Names:
  • Storz Medical DUOLITH SD1 Ultra modular system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a physical exam maneuver used frequently both clinically and for research purposes to assess the increase in velocity-dependent muscle tone after neurologic disorders. We will be focusing on the MAS score of the ankle plantar flexors. This measure is included in the NINDS list of CDE recommendations for SCI. Specifically, it evaluates the resistance to passive stretch of the ankle joint through full range of motion.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a physical exam maneuver used frequently both clinically and for research purposes to assess the increase in velocity-dependent muscle tone after neurologic disorders. We will be focusing on the MAS score of the ankle plantar flexors. This measure is included in the NINDS list of CDE recommendations for SCI. Specifically, it evaluates the resistance to passive stretch of the ankle joint through full range of motion.
8 weeks
Change in Modified Tardieu Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) was developed as a more accurate method to measure spasticity by assessing muscle tone at different velocities. Since its development, it has gone through multiple modifications. The MTS is also included in the NINDS CDE recommendations as a measure of spasticity in people with SCI. The MTS includes two measurements, quality and angle of muscle reaction.
4 weeks
Change in Modified Tardieu Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) was developed as a more accurate method to measure spasticity by assessing muscle tone at different velocities. Since its development, it has gone through multiple modifications. The MTS is also included in the NINDS CDE recommendations as a measure of spasticity in people with SCI. The MTS includes two measurements, quality and angle of muscle reaction.
8 weeks
Change in Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale (mPSFS) is a self-report scale with two components, which is meant to provide a more complete understanding of an individual's spasticity status. The first component is comprised of a five-point scale, which assesses spasm frequency between 0 ("no spasms") and 4 ("spontaneous spasms occurring more than 10 times per hour"). The second component includes a three-point scale, which assesses spasm severity between 1 ("mild") and 3 ("severe"); this component is not answered if the individual reports no spasms in part one.
4 weeks
Change in Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale (mPSFS) is a self-report scale with two components, which is meant to provide a more complete understanding of an individual's spasticity status. The first component is comprised of a five-point scale, which assesses spasm frequency between 0 ("no spasms") and 4 ("spontaneous spasms occurring more than 10 times per hour"). The second component includes a three-point scale, which assesses spasm severity between 1 ("mild") and 3 ("severe"); this component is not answered if the individual reports no spasms in part one.
8 weeks
Change in Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM) is a self-reported instrument with 37 items that assesses the impact of spasticity on health-related quality of life. It is separated into physical, psychological, and social subdomains, making is possible to investigate how spasticity impacts different aspects of quality of life. Each item is rated using a scale of 0 ("never") to 3 ("often to very often").
4 weeks
Change in Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM) is a self-reported instrument with 37 items that assesses the impact of spasticity on health-related quality of life. It is separated into physical, psychological, and social subdomains, making is possible to investigate how spasticity impacts different aspects of quality of life. Each item is rated using a scale of 0 ("never") to 3 ("often to very often").
8 weeks
Participant Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC, also referred to as the original Guy-Farrar/PGIC scale) is used to measure global treatment effect. It asks the participant to rate, using a 7-point scale (anchored by "very much worse" and "very much improved"), his or her overall impression following treatment as compared to before the treatment. This scale is particularly useful as it provides an indication of clinically important improvement. Although it was designed for and has commonly been used in pain trials, it has been used to assess efficacy of spasticity treatments in people with SCI.
4 weeks
Participant Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC, also referred to as the original Guy-Farrar/PGIC scale) is used to measure global treatment effect. It asks the participant to rate, using a 7-point scale (anchored by "very much worse" and "very much improved"), his or her overall impression following treatment as compared to before the treatment. This scale is particularly useful as it provides an indication of clinically important improvement. Although it was designed for and has commonly been used in pain trials, it has been used to assess efficacy of spasticity treatments in people with SCI.
8 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle echogenicity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Average "brightness" of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured using quantitative ultrasound techniques.
4 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle echogenicity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Average "brightness" of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured using quantitative ultrasound techniques.
8 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle elasticity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Average elasticity of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured using shear wave elastography.
4 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle elasticity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Average elasticity of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured using shear wave elastography.
8 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle fiber length
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Fiber length of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
4 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle fiber length
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Fiber length of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
8 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Thickness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
4 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Thickness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
8 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle pennation angle
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pennation angle of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
4 weeks
Medial gastrocnemius muscle pennation angle
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Pennation angle of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Subscribe