Aciclovir Versus Placebo for HSV-2 Meningitis (AMEN)

September 30, 2025 updated by: Jacob Bodilsen

Aciclovir for HSV-2 Meningitis: A Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial (AMEN)

To determine whether active treatment with (val)acyclovir is superior for treatment of viral meningitis compared with placebo assessed by numbers meeting a primary, objective endpoint at 7 days after randomisation

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥18 years of age admitted on suspicion of viral meningitis defined as:

    1. A clinical presentation consistent with viral meningitis (e.g. headache, nuchal rigidity, photophobia, or fever) AND
    2. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (>4 leukocytes x 106/L) AND
    3. HSV-2 positive by PCR of the CSF
    4. Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 AND
    5. Ability to absorb oral medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria will be excluded:

    1. Encephalitis as defined by the International Encephalitis Consortium if diagnosed during standard care (see Glossary)20
    2. Transverse myelitis as defined by the Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group if diagnosed during standard care (see Glossary)21
    3. Severe immuno-compromise defined as an ongoing need for biological- or chemotherapy (e.g. natalizumab), prednisolone >20 mg/day for ≥14 days, uncontrolled HIV/AIDS (see glossary), haematological malignancies, and organ transplant recipients14,18,22
    4. Moderate to severe concomitant genital herpes requiring systemic aciclovir
    5. Pregnancy (proven by positive urine or plasma human chorionic gonadotropin test in fertile women)
    6. Hepatic impairment (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase levels >5 times the upper limit of normal)
    7. Impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <25 mL/min)
    8. Intolerance to (val)aciclovir
    9. Probenecid treatment
    10. Systemic antiviral therapy with an antiherpetic effect for >24 hours
    11. Previous enrolment into this trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active arm
Randomisation to 7 days of active treatment with IV aciclovir 10 mg/kg q8h and possibility for oral step-down therapy with valaciclovir 1g q8h, or placebo (IV q8h and/or oral q8h).
Patients are randomised to active treatment with IV acyclovir with the possibility of step-down to valacyclovir. If the treating physician prefers, initial IV treatment can be omitted and the patient can be treated with valacyclovir throughout the study period.
Other Names:
  • Valacyclovir
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Randomisation to 7 days of IV and/or oral placebo.
Placebo either in IV formulation or as tablets identical to valacyclovir tablets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary endpoint (proportion with a Total Morbidity Score)
Time Frame: 7 days since randomisation
The proportion with a Total Morbidity Score (TMS) >6 is considered treatment failure. The score is a sum of scores for headache (range 0 to 6), nuchal rigidity (range 0 to 4), photophobia (range 0 to 4), myalgia (range 0 to 4), fever (range 0 to 4), nausea (range 0 to 4). The score thus ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
7 days since randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary endpoint 1 (Proportion of patients with ≤50% reduction of Total Morbidity Score)
Time Frame: 7 days since randomisation
Proportion of patients with ≤50% reduction of Total Morbidity Score since randomisation. Please see characterization of score under primary endpoint.
7 days since randomisation
Secondary endpoint 2 Extended Glasgow outcome scale score
Time Frame: 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Extended Glasgow outcome scale score. Range 1 to 8 with higher scores indicating better outcome.
7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Secondary endpoint 3 All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
All-cause mortality
7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Secondary endpoint 4 EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
EQ-5D-5L. Comprises 5 questions with an ordinal scale from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more morbidity. Finally, a visual analog score is filled ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health.
7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Secondary endpoint 5 Mental Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Mental Fatigue Scale. Comprises 14 questions with scores from 0 to 3 with higher values suggesting more morbidity. A combined score >10.5 usually suggests mental fatigue problems.
7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Secondary endpoint 6 (SF-36)
Time Frame: 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Scores eight different domains from 0 to 100 with higher values indicating no disability.
7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Secondary outcome 7 neurological deficit
Time Frame: 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Any new neurological deficit reported by patient or observed during clinical examination
7 days, 3 months, and 12 months since randomisation
Secondary outcome 8 Completion of assigned treatment
Time Frame: 7 days since randomisation
Completion of assigned treatment (active or placebo) assessed by administered intravenous or oral treatment as signed off by nurses in hospitalized patients and pill counts for patients discharged with oral study drug.
7 days since randomisation
Secondary outcome 9 complications
Time Frame: 7 days since randomisation
Peripheral venous line associated complications (i.e. catheter-associated infection, thrombosis, or haemorrhage).
7 days since randomisation
Secondary outcome 10Severe adverse events
Time Frame: 7 days since randomisation
Severe adverse events, i.e. incident treatment-emergent serious adverse events.
7 days since randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be deposited at Mendeley Data (https://data.mendeley.com/).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning six months and ending three years after publication, an anonymized dataset can be shared.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Herpes Simplex 2

Clinical Trials on Acyclovir 50 MG/ML

Subscribe