- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05457166
Use of the KASPARD System for Fall Prevention in Nursing Homes (KASPARD)
Interest in Using the KASPARD System for the Prevention of Falls in Nursing Homes (EHPAD, for Its French Acronym)
Falls are a frequent cause of admission to nursing homes [2]. It is also the most frequently reported adverse event in these institutions.
The prevention of falls in EHPAD must mobilise several levers of action and involve all staff. It must be included in the establishment's project in the same way as the policy on the proper use of restraints [21].
Home automation and new technologies can contribute to the prevention of falls and their consequences. Most of the existing solutions on the market are either fall detection solutions based on a watch or pendant or rise detection solutions based on a sub-mattress or floor mat. All of these solutions work with a contact and often require a daily set-up or check by the care teams. But the real challenge today for new technologies is to prevent falls in the elderly, by directly addressing the risk factors.
KASPARD is a non-contact (remote sensors) and non-intrusive (no video image, it uses point cloud technology) solution for detecting falls, excessive wandering and nocturnal activities in a nursing home. The information is transmitted securely via the wifi network to a mobile phone (or TSI/DECT) and to a computer. The KASPARD solution, which is already on the market (non-medical CE marking), is used in several EHPADs in Belgium and France. It is not a medical device. To date, it has a sensitivity and specificity of over 90% (manufacturer's unpublished data).
We wish to verify the effectiveness of the KASPARD technology for the prevention of falls in EHPAD, suggested for the moment by an observational study, with the help of a multi-centre clinical study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lille, France
- Pôle de gérontologie - Hôpital Les Bateliers
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and/or female resident of an EHPAD
- Person aged ≥ 65 years
- Elderly person at high risk of falling (fell at least 1 time in the 6 months prior to inclusion)
- Resident or his/her legal representative who has given free, written, informed consent to participate in the trial
- Socially insured resident
- Resident willing to comply with all study procedures and duration. The questionnaires used will be validated questionnaires for the target population (QoL-AD questionnaire for residents and their carers).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Elderly resident who has a fall and for whom the use of a restraint is deemed essential by the coordinating doctor of the EHPAD
- Persons under legal protection are not excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: patients
patients in a before/after experimental design to assess the value of using the KASPARD technology compared to the conventional management of patients with falls in nursing homes
|
All subjects will be monitored for 2 periods of 100 nights each. Recordings will be made continuously at night for the duration of the study Period 0: set-up, adjustment, recording (without alarm); This is a preparatory phase which is part of the usual use of the device. Duration: 10 days Before period: The BEFORE period runs for 100 nights during which the device alarm is not activated, but the device records events. After period: The AFTER period is 100 nights during which the device alarm is activated: Monitoring with recording + alarm activated (usual care + action if alarm is triggered) |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the number of falls observed over a period of 100 nights with KASPARD
Time Frame: 100 nights
|
To show that the KASPARD system reduces the number of falls observed over a period of 100 nights with the device activated compared to a period of 100 nights with the device deactivated, in elderly people aged over 65 years residing in EPAD and at high risk of falling.
|
100 nights
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The number of night shift interventions
Time Frame: 100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
|
|
The number of nights without restraint
Time Frame: 100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
|
|
The time taken to intervene after a fall
Time Frame: 100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
Time between the occurrence of the fall and the arrival of staff at the patient's bedside
|
100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
|
Fear of falling assessed by the FES scale
Time Frame: 100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
Fear of falling reported by residents at the end of each period: last day of period 1 and last day of period 2
|
100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
|
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
Quality of life questionnaire reported by the patient and once at the end of each period: last day of period 1 and last day of period 2
|
100 nights with the device on versus 100 nights with the device off
|
|
Resident satisfaction
Time Frame: activation period of 100 nights
|
Resident satisfaction will be assessed by a satisfaction questionnaire
|
activation period of 100 nights
|
|
Night and day staff satisfaction
Time Frame: activation period of 100 nights
|
Staff satisfaction will be assessed by a satisfaction questionnaire evaluating organisational aspects, disturbance of walking patients, interest in the reports provided by the system
|
activation period of 100 nights
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: François Puisieux, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020_89
- 2021-A03210-41 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Accidental Falls
-
The Hospital District of SatakuntaCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingAccidental FallsFrance
-
Shirley HuangJintronixRecruiting
-
Sigma Theta Tau InternationalRecruiting
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreVA Maryland Health Care SystemCompletedAccidental FallsUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineUS Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCompleted
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheSocio- Health Center Puente Real ( Health Care for Older © ) of BadajozCompleted
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompletedAccidental FallsHong Kong
-
Montana State UniversityCompletedAccidental FallsUnited States
-
University of PittsburghBoston University; Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc.; Mt. Ascutney Hospital...CompletedAccidental FallsUnited States
Clinical Trials on KASPARD system for fall prevention in nursing homes
-
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Unilever R&DCompleted
-
Fudan UniversityShanghai Zhongshan Hospital; Huashan Hospital; Shengjing Hospital; Children's Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingQuality Improvement | Central Venous Catheter Associated Bloodstream Infection | CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection | Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection | Central Line Infection | CRBSI - Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection | Evidence-based Nursing PracticeChina
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); Opportunity FundRecruitingSexual Violence | Drinking HeavyUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier de CayenneFoundation for Scientific Research Suriname (SWOS) Paramaribo, SurinameCompletedHIV Infections | Hepatitis B | Hepatitis C | Hepatitis D | Prevalence | EpidemiologyFrench Guiana, Suriname
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentUnknown
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownSpinal Anesthetics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use