CIED Infection Quality Initiative Demonstration Project (RECTIFY)

May 4, 2026 updated by: Duke University

The Review and Improvement of Cardiac Implantable Device Infection Quality Initiative (RECTIFY) Demonstration Project

The aim of this Quality Initiative (QI) demonstration project is to develop a model to increase guideline-driven care for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infection. Multidisciplinary teams will be established to carry out the multifaceted intervention. This program seeks to improve early identification and diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and faster time to treatment of CIED infection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Retrospective data will be collected pre-intervention. The interventions will then be implemented for a total of six months and will continue through the data collection period. Prospective data collection will start three months after the intervention is started and will continue for a total of 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern
        • Contact:
          • Anna Huskin, RN, BSN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Albert Lin, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Atrium Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rohit Mehta, MD
        • Contact:
          • Melissa Myers
        • Contact:
          • Nicole Boisvert
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Satish Misra, MD
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Moses Cone
        • Contact:
          • Cameron Lambert, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cameron Lambert, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) in place
  • Presumed CIED infection, as defined by:

    1. Positive blood culture (two or more positive blood cultures for typical skin organisms (coagulase-negative staphylococci, Corynebacterium species, Propionobacterium species), or one positive blood culture for all other microorganisms), with no other source identified to explain the bacteremia
    2. Cases with definite evidence of pocket infection (defined as localized erythema, swelling, pain, tenderness, warmth, erosion, or drainage), if treated with antibiotics before culture, even with negative culture, will be considered device infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are inappropriate for device extraction, for example those who are DNAR and not using therapy to prolong survival because any procedure is considered inappropriate and/or it is unlikely that extraction would change overall prognosis
  • Death within one week of definitive CIED systemic infection diagnosis or positive blood culture. Cases of bacteremia originating from a source other than the CIED that resolve without any evidence of CIED involvement should not be considered as CIED infection
  • Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Quality Improvement Program
The quality improvement program will consist of development and/or refinement of participating health system's patient care pathways tailored to address the gaps and barriers around recognition and treatment of CIED infections. Interventions will be customized and modified as needed based on regular reviews and implementation progress.
Multidisciplinary team will be established that will define gaps in care, monitor ongoing data, identify barriers to guideline-directed care, and develop and implement multifaceted intervention to address the barriers
An outreach visit consulting group from the coordinating center and trial leadership will provide external guidance on reviewing data, defining barriers, and implementing interventions
These interventions are not limited to targeted engagement with non-extractors, electronic health record (EHR) decision support, creation of OR block time, use of opinion leaders, and development of clinical pathways. In addition, once patients are identified and referred to extraction centers, clinical pathways are needed to provide prompt care without clinical delay
The coordinating center will provide ongoing feedback related to the site's data. This will include time to diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes related to the device infection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with CIEDs and positive blood cultures who receive extraction (per guidelines)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients with CIEDs and positive blood cultures, who receive extraction
Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients with CIEDs and definite pocket infections who receive extraction (per guidelines)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients with CIEDs and probable device infection, who receive extraction
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with extraction within 7 days of diagnosis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients who who receive extraction within 7 days and during index hospitalization
Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients with extraction during index hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Time from positive blood culture/clear pocket infection to extraction for those undergoing extraction
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Number of patients identified with suspected CIED infection
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Number of patients referred to both Extraction Center (from outside hospital) and electrophysiologists (at Extraction Center) for extraction
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Number of actual extractions
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Number of patients with multi-organ failure or septic shock at time of extraction
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Estimated healthcare utilization/costs
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Staff satisfaction as measured by a qualitative survey
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Patient satisfaction as measured by a qualitative survey
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of deaths from CIED infection
Up to 12 months
Length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinical outcomes: number of days of hospitalization
Up to 12 months
Days of antibiotic treatments
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of days patient received antibiotics
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chris Granger, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Sean Pokorney, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on Multidisciplinary Team

Subscribe