Scapulo-Thoracic Mobilization Compared to IASTM in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

SCAPULO-THORACIC MOBILIZATION COMPARED TO IASTM IN PATIENTS WITH MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Mechanical Neck Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: scapulothoracic mobilization; Other: IASTM

Detailed Description

Mechanical neck pain is common musculoskeletal condition that causes work disabilities and is not self-limiting. One of the main causes for mechanical neck pain is forward head posture, which is common and but not ideal posture adopted by many workers and students who presents with head being anterior to the shoulder. Imbalances in the normal muscle function reported in such patients with inhibited deep neck flexors, serratus anterior and rhomboids and tightened pectoralis, upper trapezius and levator scapula.

Neck and scapula have some common muscle attachments and abnormal loads on cervical or thoracic spine change the biomechanics of muscles present in these regions, which eventually cause trigger points Management of scapulo-thoracic joint focuses on correcting posture, restoring flexibility of the scapula including the pectoralis minor, levator scapulae, rhomboids, mobilization and soft tissue techniques.

IASTM is ergonomically designed stainless steel tool, and has recently gained much popularity for elevating pain, reducing trigger points and improving ROMs because it has deeply penetrating power as compared to mobilization through hand. This technique works by both along the mobilizing muscle fibers or parallel to the muscle fibers.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 32
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Pakistan
  • Punjab
    • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46010
      • Pakistan Railway General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 40 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age group 18 to 40 years
• Both gender groups
• Non radiating neck pain

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of cervical and thoracic spine surgery
• Vertibro-basilar insufficiency
• Sign of serious pathology like malignancy
• Signs of systemic inflammatory disorder
• Patient with diagnosed hypertension
• (scapular area pathology)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Scapulothoracic mobilization along with conventional physical therapy for mechanical neck pain.; conventional physical therapy: Scapulothoracic mobilization: Patient in prone lying position. The left hand of the physical therapist lifts the scapula to distract from the thoracic wall while the right hand mobilizes and stretches the inferior muscle groups attached to the scapula.	Other: scapulothoracic mobilization; Patient in prone lying position. The left hand of the physical therapist lifts the scapula to distract from the thoracic wall while the right hand mobilizes and stretches the inferior muscle groups attached to the scapula.
Active Comparator: IASTM with conventional physical therapy for mechanical neck pain; Conventional Physical Therapy: IASTM (Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Technique): Patient sitting or prone lying Restrictions and myofascial adhesions assessed prior to treatment fanning strokes at 45 degree angles to skin be applied using the tool	Other: IASTM; Restrictions and myofascial adhesions should be assessed prior to treatment along both sides using IASTM tool and a lubricant. Once restrictions are assessed, fanning strokes at 45 degree angles to skin should be applied using the tool. This technique should be performed for 20 seconds parallel to the muscle fibers and 20 seconds perpendicular to the muscle fibers for each muscle group in scapulothoracic region. Total time for IASTM application is 10 mints. Upon completing all this patient should be given a home plan consisting of 2 different self-stretches targeting levator scapulae and upper trapezius; Other Names: Instrument assisted Soft tissue mobilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale	Changes from baseline Numeric pain Rating Scale is used to objectively assess musculoskeletal pain as marked by the patient. It is a 10 point scale from 0 to 10. 0 depicts no pain at all and 10 shows worst pain ever felt. It was measured at baseline, at 3rd session after 6th weeks of the intervention.	3 weeks
NDI (neck disability index)	The questionnaire has 10 items concerning pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation. The measure is designed to be given to the patient to complete, and can provide useful information for management and prognosis of those with neck pain	3 weeks
Goniometer	goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits rotation of an object to a definite position	3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Riphah International University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 1, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): July 30, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 24, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 24, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): July 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 7, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 5, 2022
• Last Verified: September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: mechanical neck pain; IASTM; scapulo-thoracic mobilization
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Neck Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: REC/01073 Iqra

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No