- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05479682
Investigating the Equivalence of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-F17
The EORTC QLQ-C30, a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is available in 110 different languages, has been used in thousands of clinical cancer trials worldwide. The QLQ-C30 is composed of six functioning scales (including a measure for global quality of life), three symptom scales, and six single items.
Researchers and regulatory bodies came up with the idea to construct a shortened EORTC questionnaire that solely consists of functioning scales and to use additional symptom items according to the side effect profile of the specific medication under investigation.
This shortened form termed QLQ-F17 includes the Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Emotional Functioning (EF), Cognitive Functioning (CF), and Social Functioning (SF) scales as well as the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QL) scale in their original wording. This functioning questionnaire can be amended with symptom-specific items taken from the EORTC item library. This method provides a flexible and economic testing strategy that fits the demands of regulators and users in industry and academia.
It is an open question, however, whether the QLQ-F17 is equivalent to the QLQ-C30 in terms of measurement properties. Based on empirical research on response biases and order effects, one might argue that elimination of the symptoms between RF and CF-Dyspnea (DY), Pain (PA), Fatigue (FA), Insomnia (SL), Appetite (AP), Nausea/Vomiting (NV), Constipation (CO), and Diarrhea (DI)-and of the Financial difficulties (FI) item between SF and QL may alter the manner in which subsequent items are completed.
Thus, from a methodological point of view, it is essential to confirm the psychometric properties of the QLQ-F17 and to present evidence that scale values derived from the QLQ-F17 are equivalent to those of the QLQ-C30. Only in the case of equivalence may studies using either of the two basic questionnaires be compared directly. The present project is designed to address this research question.
This is an international multicenter survey study that will include respondents with cancer from Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom. A randomized cross-over design will be applied, enabling between-patients as well as within-patients comparisons of the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-F17. One group of respondents will first fill in the QLQ-C30 followed by the QLQ-F17, the other group will start with the QLQ-F17 followed by the QLQ-C30.
A sample size of 1.500 cancer patients is sufficient to get precise estimates with narrow confidence intervals regarding item and scale-level agreement. Thresholds and margins to be used for the analyses in this study will be consented by a statistical advisory group. Reliability and psychometric properties can also be precisely estimated with a sample of this size. The present study is based on the hypothesis that the QLQ-F17 and the QLQ-C30 questionnaires are equivalent.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Regensburg, Germany
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The sample will include patients with the following diagnoses:
Breast, Lung, Colorectal, Prostate, Head&Neck, Melanoma, Haematological, others
The sample will include patients with the following treatment states:
Active, Regular aftercare, Off (survivors, long-term survivors)
The survey will be conducted in the following language regions:
English-speaking countries: UK, US, Australia; West-Germanic language: German; Scandinavian language: Swedish; Slavic languages: Polish; Romance languages: French (France), Italian, Spanish (Spain), Romanian; Other European language: Finnish
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients suffering from cancer or in remission
Exclusion Criteria:
none
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 first, EORTC QLQ-F17 second
Intervention relates to the order of questionnaires to be completed.
In this cohort, the EORTC QLQ-C30 will be completed first and after a short interim task the QLQ-F17 second.
|
|
EORTC QLQ-F17 first, EORTC QLQ-C30 second
Intervention relates to the order of questionnaires to be completed.
In this cohort, the order of questionnaires is reversed: EORTC QLQ-F17 will be completed first and after a short interim task the QLQ-C30 second.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The EORTC Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) includes six clearly distinguishable functioning scales that have been thoroughly tested and validated on an international level and that are available in 110 different language versions
|
Day 1
|
|
QLQ-F17
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The QLQ-F17 is the shortened version of the QLQ-C30 that is composed solely of items related to functioning, which include Physical (PF), Role (RF), Emotional (EF), Cognitive (CF) and Social Functioning (SF) scales as well as the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QL) scale in their original wording.
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Koller, Prof. Dr., Head of Center for Clinical Trials
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Z-2021-1709-7
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
-
Oslo University HospitalNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompletedHealth-Related Quality of LifeNorway