Lung Ultrasound-guided Hemodynamic Optimization (POINTBAR)

Lung Ultrasound-guided Hemodynamic Optimization in Major Non-cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Control

The formalized expert recommendation of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care recommends guiding vascular filling by measuring the stroke volume (SV) in surgical patients considered at high risk. Vascular filling should be continued in the event of preload dependence and stopped in the event of the appearance of preload independence. The aim is to avoid vascular overload due to excessive vascular filling. The application of this recommendation has resulted in a reduction in postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay and time to return to oral feeding. The superiority of this strategy is now being questioned and the predictive indices of response to vascular filling (static and dynamic) have many limitations. In addition, none of the cardiac output monitors are the gold standard for intraoperative use.

Through the study of artefacts, lung ultrasound has been gaining ground over the last twenty years, particularly in cardiology, nephrology and intensive care. By analogy with radiological B-lines, ultrasound B-lines result from the reverberation of ultrasound on the subpleural inter-lobular septa thickened by oedema. The Fluid Administration Limited by Lung Sonography (FALLS) protocol, described by Lichtenstein et al, is defined as the visualisation of new B lines during a vascular filling test. If a B-line appears in an area where it was not present during vascular filling, the most likely diagnosis is hydrostatic overload of the subpleural interstitial septum. This appearance of B-lines occurs at a sub-clinical stage.

The use of lung ultrasound could allow real-time assessment of vascular filling and its tolerance during the intraoperative period. The main objective of the study is to demonstrate a decrease in the incidence of postoperative complications (organ failure) (as defined by international guidelines) when using lung ultrasound-guided haemodynamic optimisation compared to standard optimisation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age> 18 years old
  • Abdominal, orthopaedic or vascular surgery with general anaesthesia
  • Patient of legal age ≥ 18 years.
  • ASA score ≥ II
  • Estimated duration of surgery > 2 hours
  • At least two of the following comorbidities (age > 50 years, hypertension, heart disease, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, acute pulmonary oedema, smoking, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, non-insulin dependent or insulin dependent diabetes, ascites, chronic renal failure)
  • Signed consent.
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe untreated or unbalanced hypertension on treatment.
  • Preoperative renal failure on dialysis.
  • Acute heart failure.
  • Acute coronary insufficiency.
  • Vascular surgery with renal plasty.
  • Cardiac surgery.
  • Preoperative shock.
  • Refusal of patient participation.
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman.
  • Patient under guardianship or private law.
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the Berlin definition
  • respiratory distress not fully explained by cardiac failure or increased blood volume,
  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 mm Hg on mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive)
  • Chronic respiratory failure with home oxygen therapy.
  • Chronic interstitial lung disease
  • Presence of an acoustic barrier (pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, pleural calcifications, chest bandage, gunshot shrapnel...)
  • Participation in other interventional drug research.
  • Surgical fields covering the sites of investigation in lung ultrasound.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
The control group will be treated according to the usual protocol of the department (standard group)
In the control group, the haemodynamic management of the patients is done according to usual practice by maintaining blood pressure with noradrenaline and optimising stroke volume with vascular filling.
Experimental: pulmonary ultrasound group
the experimental group follows an algorithm incorporating the number of B-lines occurring after a filling test (pulmonary ultrasound group).
In the interventional group, intraoperative haemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes measurement of the number of B-lines appearing on pulmonary ultrasound after vascular filling. Monitoring of the stroke volume will also be performed in this group in order to stop the vascular filling if the ESV does not increase by more than 10%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Postoperative Organ failure
Time Frame: within 7 days
Organ failure is defined according to the recommendations of the European Society of Anaesthesia (ESA)
within 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 7 days
Number of days staying in hospital
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Ultrasound

Clinical Trials on noradrenaline and vascular filling

Subscribe