Access Cannulation Trial II (ACT II)

October 27, 2025 updated by: Voyager Biomedical

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Voyager's Access Device for Patients Undergoing Routine Hemodialysis (Access Cannulation Trial II)

This is a pivotal, interventional, prospective, single-arm, open-label, multi-site clinical investigation intended to support FDA clearance of the study device based on the safety and efficacy of the device in cannulating arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis procedures.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This clinical investigation is estimated to last approximately 48-60 months, from initial participant enrollment until all data collection is complete on the final participant. After the patient has the study device implanted, they will be observed for 6 weeks as the implant site heals. The patient will be monitored for 36 months after device implantation as they undergo routine dialysis. Subjects will exit the investigation after the last visit and no device-related adverse events have been identified or are being monitored

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36301
        • Recruiting
        • Trinity Research Group
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Beaver, MD
        • Contact:
    • California
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92505
        • Recruiting
        • Apex Research
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dalia Dawoud, MD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mohamed Hussain, MD
    • New York
      • Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11042
    • South Carolina
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • Recruiting
        • MUSC Health Orangeburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark London, MD
        • Contact:
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • Recruiting
        • Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adam Turley, MD
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Recruiting
        • Baylor Scott & White
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephen Hohmann, MD
        • Contact:
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24014
        • Recruiting
        • Fairlawn Surgery Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ryan Evans, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

  1. The subject's AVF is deemed uncannulatable because:

    1. The subject's anticipated cannulation zone(s) is/are >6mm in depth from the surface of the skin to the anterior wall of the access vein as confirmed by ultrasound within 8 weeks prior to device implantation (each zone, Arterial/Pull and Venous/Push, shall be assessed independently of one another for device placement):

      • Arterial/Pull Zone: _____ mm deep
      • Venous/Push Zone: _____ mm deep

      OR

    2. The subject's dialysis unit (which includes an experienced cannulator) attests that repeated cannulation is not achievable in their clinic due to one of the following:

      • Failed access attempt in a fistula that was previously approved for cannulation, or
      • Unable to palpate the fistula such that cannulation is not possible without patient risk.
  2. The access surgeon caring for the subject attests that the device is likely to be at least equivalent to other methods (such as venous transposition or suction-assisted lipectomy) that could make the AVF easier to access and reduce risk of cannulation infiltrations.
  3. The subject has either a radio-cephalic, brachio-cephalic or transposed brachio-basilic fistula.

Exclusion:

  1. The subject's access vein is >15mm in depth at either cannulation zones as measured by ultrasound within 8 weeks prior to device implantation.

    • Arterial/Pull Zone: _____ mm in depth
    • Venous/Push Zone: _____ mm in depth Note: these values should match inclusion criteria #1
  2. Both bidimensional measurements in the subject's access vein have a diameter of <4mm, taken with a tourniquet in place or through manual compression to the outflow, as measured by ultrasound within 8 weeks prior to device implantation (cannulation zone specific - one zone does not affect the other's eligibility).

    • Arterial/Pull Zone: _____ x _____ mm in diameter
    • Venous/Push Zone: _____ x _____ mm in diameter
  3. The subject has a flow rate of <550mL/min in the inflow artery proximal to the arterial anastomosis as measured by ultrasound within 8 weeks prior to device implantation.

    • Flow: _____ mL/min

  4. The subject does NOT have a prescription to receive maintenance hemodialysis at least 2 times per week.
  5. The subject's life expectancy is <1 year per the Investigator.
  6. The subject does NOT have a signed and dated consent form.
  7. The AVF is a non-transposed basilic or brachial vein outflow AVF.
  8. The subject has high flow rates placing them at risk for heart failure and death at the discretion of the Investigator.
  9. The subject has a known skin infection, hypersensitive skin, skin breakdown/erosion or skin allergies at the potential implant sites.
  10. The subject has a known active systemic infection or positive blood cultures present.
  11. The subject's AVF has undergone a major revision and at the discretion of the Investigator can impact fistula viability and device placement (such as DRIL or PTFE segment insertion, banding, aneurysm repair, etc.), or the subject has had an occurrence of and/or intervention for AV access stenosis or thrombosis within the past month (excluded to avoid unnecessary placement into an AVF with a high likelihood of failure).
  12. The subject is <18 years of age.
  13. The subject plans to become pregnant prior to their potential treatment date.
  14. The subject has a body mass index >50kg/m2.
  15. The subject has a known clinically significant bleeding or coagulation disorder, including but not limited to low platelet count (<50,000), hypercoagulable state (e.g., antithrombin IE deficiency, antiphospholipid or anticardiolipin antibodies, Factor V Leiden, circulating Lupus anticoagulant, current, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, protein C or S deficiency, history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis not related to AV access).
  16. The subject has an active malignancy.
  17. The subject has a known or suspected allergy to titanium, aluminum, or vanadium.
  18. The subject has had a significant cardiovascular event/intervention that makes them a poor surgical candidate such as myocardial infarction, angioplasty, or stent placement within 3 months of implantation.
  19. The subject has had a significant peripheral vascular disease requiring a major intervention within the previous 12 months (in the target limb).
  20. The subject has had a significant neurovascular event such as stroke or major intervention within the previous 12 months.
  21. The subject has an uncontrolled major symptomatic medical problem per the Investigator.
  22. The subject has a likelihood of poor protocol compliance due to mental incapacity, an inability to understand treatment instructions, or for any other reason in the opinion of the Investigator.
  23. The subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device investigation that could clinically interfere with the endpoints of this investigation.
  24. The subject's conversion to home hemodialysis is anticipated at any point during their foreseeable participation in this investigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ark Implantation
Single arm study. Depending on the clinical needs of the patient, the physician will decide if a single return device is needed (ex. easily cannulatable arterial pull site but the venous return access site is poorly accessible for cannulation) or two devices (both arterial pull and venous return are poorly accessible for cannulation).
The device will be surgically implanted at the access site in subjects undergoing routine hemodialysis. The device is expected to provide a target to aid in long-term cannulation success.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To demonstrate the effectiveness of the study device in facilitating cannulation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis.
Time Frame: 6 months
Incidence of success for achieving clinically functional access within a 6-month timeframe from approved cannulation through the study device.
6 months
To evaluate the safety of the study device.
Time Frame: 12 months
The assessment and occurrence of device-related, serious adverse events (SAEs) of clinical interest (infection, aneurysm, complicated seroma) during a 12- month follow-up period from initial implantation adjudicated by a Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate time-related parameters surrounding the study device in facilitating hemodialysis.
Time Frame: 12 months
Cumulative duration (days) of hemodialysis catheter exposure (post device implantation), including CVC reinsertion events
12 months
To further evaluate the safety of the study device
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence and types of device-related complications
12 months
To further evaluate the safety of the study device
Time Frame: 12 months
Days to successful cannulation and hemodialysis through the device
12 months
To further evaluate the safety of the study device
Time Frame: 6mo from approved cannulation through the device
Vascular access interventions required to achieve the primary effectiveness endpoint
6mo from approved cannulation through the device
To further evaluate the safety of the study device
Time Frame: 36 months
Time required to achieve the primary endpoint for all evaluable subjects.
36 months
To further evaluate the safety of the study device
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
(Post intervention) Functional Cumulative Patency utilizing Kaplan-Meier methodology
3 months, 6 months, 12 months
To further evaluate the safety of the study device
Time Frame: 4 weeks from initial implantation
Initial Safety Assessment (Time Frame = 4 weeks from initial implantation) adjudicated by a Data Monitoring Committee (DMC).
4 weeks from initial implantation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory Outcome 2
Time Frame: SCRN/BSLN, 6 months, 12 months
Patient Satisfaction Survey
SCRN/BSLN, 6 months, 12 months
Exploratory Outcome 3
Time Frame: 12 months
Utilization of health care resources: health economic data analysis to be performed based on available study data for the treatment related costs (e.g. procedural costs, hospital costs, etc.)
12 months
Exploratory Outcome 1
Time Frame: 36 months
Infiltration rate and AVF failure rate after infiltration
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Hohmann, MD, Baylor Scott and White Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 25, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 25, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Access Cannulation Trial II

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

If data is shared after study completion it will be redacted of any PHI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vascular Access Complication

Subscribe