Effects of Trunk Stability Exercises on Hand Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy

August 4, 2022 updated by: Riphah International University
Rationale of this research is to evaluate the outcome of trunk stabilizing exercises on the fine motor skills of subjects with hemiplegic CP. The significance of this study is to identify how much core stability exercises improve hand function. This study will help gather evidence on the practice of core stabilizing exercises to improve hand function so that it can help both physicians and patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy is a permanent damage in early brain in fetus which leads to movement disorder. The most frequent reason of bodily incapacity is cerebral palsy in pediatric population. CP children have difficulty maintaining dynamic and static trunk stability, which leads to affect sitting, standing, reaching and walking. Hemiplegic Cerebral palsy patients are challenged by fine motor skills, like gripping or object handling, which are essential for activities of daily life.the purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of trunk stability exercises on hand function in children with cerebral palsy.It was a randomized, controlled trial, conducted among hemiplegic cerebral palsy patients. Sample size was 26 by using Epitool software. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group after a baseline assessment with a lottery ticket and an opaque envelope. All participants in both groups were evaluated on three occasions: (i) baseline (ii) post-intervention and (iii) after 4 weeks follow to assess long term effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54792
        • Rising Sun Institute for Special Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both male and female were included
  • Age group 6 to 18 years.
  • Medical diagnosis of hemiplegic cerebral palsy assured.
  • Unilateral Movement deficit (less than 2.5) on amount of use scale on MAL (motor activity log).
  • Level 1 to 3 on manual ability classification system (MACS).
  • Mild to moderate spasticity of upper extremity (MAS grade 1 to 2.)
  • GMCS level I-II.
  • Subjects were cognitively capable and competent to follow the instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with altered conscious level.
  • Previous surgery or pain in upper limbs.
  • Rigid contracture and fixed deformities in the spine
  • Auditory / vision problem.
  • Previous Botulinum Toxin-A injections in upper limb.
  • Cardio-respiratory problem

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conservative physiotherapy plan
Postural and Proprioceptive facilitation,walking ,jumping and staircase activity
Physiotherapy plan consist of following exercises, Postural and Proprioceptive facilitation like weight-bearing actions for the upper and lower extremities. Sit to stand, standing , holding on to stand, free arms standing up, holding on standing and asked the patient to lift one leg, one leg standing, standing on balance board,Straight and sideways parallel bar walk, For the effected body side jumping on stable and dynamic surface,Upstairs and down stair activity performed on staircase.This program was given for 40 minutes with a rest period of 2 minutes between each group of exercises, 4 days a week for 8 weeks (32 sessions)

trunk stability exercise plan consist of three levels, Proprioception included supine abdominal draw was performed in 1st simple level ,3 sets per 20 repetitions were performed, A double knee to chest abdominal draw was performed with 3 sets per 20 repetition, Supine twist with 3 sets per 20 repetitions was performed.Balance training included pelvic bridging was 2nd complicated level performed with 3 sets per 4-6 repetitions,Twists with a medicine ball were performed with 3 sets per 10-20 repetitions.

for Stability Bridging with head lied on physio ball was performed in 3rd difficult level when holding the position for 4 to 6 seconds, then relaxed slowly for same time with 3 sets per 10 to 20 repetitions, Prone bridging was performed with 3 sets per 4 to 6 repetitions.

There was a 30 seconds to 1 minute break between the sets.This program was given for 1 hour with a rest period of 2 minutes between each group of exercises, 4 days a week for 8 weeks (32 sessions)

Experimental: Trunk stability exercise plan
Trunk stability exercises including proprioception,balance and stability.
Physiotherapy plan consist of following exercises, Postural and Proprioceptive facilitation like weight-bearing actions for the upper and lower extremities. Sit to stand, standing , holding on to stand, free arms standing up, holding on standing and asked the patient to lift one leg, one leg standing, standing on balance board,Straight and sideways parallel bar walk, For the effected body side jumping on stable and dynamic surface,Upstairs and down stair activity performed on staircase.This program was given for 40 minutes with a rest period of 2 minutes between each group of exercises, 4 days a week for 8 weeks (32 sessions)

trunk stability exercise plan consist of three levels, Proprioception included supine abdominal draw was performed in 1st simple level ,3 sets per 20 repetitions were performed, A double knee to chest abdominal draw was performed with 3 sets per 20 repetition, Supine twist with 3 sets per 20 repetitions was performed.Balance training included pelvic bridging was 2nd complicated level performed with 3 sets per 4-6 repetitions,Twists with a medicine ball were performed with 3 sets per 10-20 repetitions.

for Stability Bridging with head lied on physio ball was performed in 3rd difficult level when holding the position for 4 to 6 seconds, then relaxed slowly for same time with 3 sets per 10 to 20 repetitions, Prone bridging was performed with 3 sets per 4 to 6 repetitions.

There was a 30 seconds to 1 minute break between the sets.This program was given for 1 hour with a rest period of 2 minutes between each group of exercises, 4 days a week for 8 weeks (32 sessions)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trunk Control Meaurment Scale
Time Frame: 12 week
The trunk control measurement scale measures two mechanism of trunk control throughout functional activities. First level begins with smooth base of support and it ends on dynamic service to assess balance of body.15 items performed with the sub scales that consist of 5, 7 and 3 activities respectively. Total score ranges from 0 to 58 on scale.
12 week
ABILHAND-kids (Manual Ability Measure)
Time Frame: 12 week
ABILHAND-Kids questionnaire is valuable tool to assess a child's unimanual and bimanual upper limb activities. This 21 items hand use scale with total 63 score prestents low to high performance of fine motor .
12 week
CHEQ (Children's hand-use experience's questionnaire)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire has been developed to capture kid's perceived quality of performance when using the affected hand in these situations. CHEQ is an internet based questionnaire containing 29 items with (bimanual activities) presented one by one in random order .score ranges from 0 to 100 representing better function with higher score .
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UE MAL
Time Frame: 12 weeks
It consists of both the AS and HW scales are used during all test administrations, except for the periodic administrations of MAL during treatment, when only the HW scale is used. In all administrations except those done during treatment, begin with AS scale and ask participants to rate all task using the AS scale first the participant than rates all tasks perform with the HW scale
12 weeks
Manual ability classification system
Time Frame: 12 weeks
It's a 5 level ordinal classification system which describes the manual ability of children aged 4 to 18 years with cerebral palsy. When children holds objects in typical activities, MACS levels describe the collaborative use of both hands together in daily life activities .As a classification system the purpose of MACS is to discriminate meaningfully on child's manual ability to handle objects in daily living. It's not an outcome measure or diagnostic tool
12 weeks
Modified ash worth scale (MAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The original ash worth scale by Bryan Ashworth was a five point numerical scale that graded spasticity from 0 to 4, with zero being no resistance and 4 being a limb rigid in flexion or extension. In 1987 when while performing a study to exam reliability of manual tests of elbow flexor muscle spasticity, Bohannon and Smith modified the ash worth scale by adding 1+ to scale to increase sensitivity. Since modified ash worth scale has been applied in clinical practice and research as measure/grade muscle spasticity
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sidra Shafique, tDPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/RCR & AHS/22/0710

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on conservative physiotherapy plan

Subscribe