Full Thickness Resection or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Difficult Colorectal Lesions.

November 2, 2022 updated by: Giulio Antonelli, University of Roma La Sapienza

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection (EFTR) Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in the Treatment of Difficult Colorectal Lesions With Dimensional Cut-off ≤ 30mm: Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG), "no Lift" Lesions and Residual / Relapses of Previous Resections. Endoscopic.

Compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection a full thickness (EFTR) with Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) System versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG), "no lift" lesions colon and residual / relapse on scars from previous resections endoscopic colon. The dimensional cut off of these lesions is ≤30mm

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rome
      • Ariccia, Rome, Italy, 00040
        • Ospedale dei Castelli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • patients of age >18 years
  • Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG) ≤ 3cm in diameter
  • "no-lift" colic injuries ≤ 3cm in diameter
  • residual / recurrence on the scar of previous endoscopic resections of the colon ≤ 3cm in diameter

Exclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women
  • failure to accept or understand the consent to participate in the study
  • patients with severe coagulopathies
  • patients with short life expectancy (Charlson comorbidity index ≥8)
  • patients with expired general clinical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
The Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) procedures will be performed with the devices commonly used at the Services of Endoscopy of the Centers participating in the study. There are several models of knives on the market, produced by different companies, all considered equally effective by international guidelines.
Standard Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection using standard procedure described in international guidelines.
Experimental: Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR)
The FTRD® (Full Thickness Resection Device; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) is the only over-the-scope device designed to undergo Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR) using a "clip-and-cut" technique. It consists of a 14 mm modified over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) mounted on the outside of a 23 mm cap, which has a preloaded 13 mm monofilament loop at the end. This device received the CE mark for the lower digestive tract in September 2014 and its efficacy and safety have been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials.
Full Thickness Endoscopic Resection using the FTRD Ovesco Device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
En-bloc resection rate
Time Frame: 1 year
the rate of one-piece resection of the lesions
1 year
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: 1 year
percentage of patients with histologically negative lateral and deep margins
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

Subscribe