Comparison of Strategies for Vascular Access Closure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (ACCESS-TAVI)

April 22, 2024 updated by: Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Comparison of Strategies for Vascular Access Closure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The ACCESS-TAVI Randomized Trial

The ACCESS-TAVI trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial. The objective of the trial is to compare two different vascular closure device strategies for large bore vascular access following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with regard to safety and efficacy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Detailed information is provided elsewhere.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 80636
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and able to give consent
  • Patients with an indication for TF-TAVI as judged by the local multi-disciplinary heart team
  • Feasibility of transfemoral access route using commercially available transcatheter heart valves and delivery systems
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vascular access site anatomy not suitable for percutaneous vascular closure device
  • Vascular access site complications prior to the TAVI procedure
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the VCD
  • Active bleeding or bleeding diathesis
  • Absence of computed tomographic data of the access site before the procedure
  • Systemic infection or local infection at or near the access site
  • Limited long-term prognosis due to other comorbid conditions
  • Patient cannot adhere to or complete the trial protocol for any reason
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in any other interventional trial
  • Patients with mechanical heart valves in mitral position
  • Patients with elevated international normalized ratio (INR) due to oral anticoagulation therapy requiring reversal of vitamin K antagonists prior to TAVI using prothrombin complex concentrate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined suture- and plug-based VCD strategy
1 ProGlide or ProStyle + 1 Angio-Seal
Combined suture- and plug-based VCD strategy after TF-TAVI.
Experimental: Pure suture-based VCD strategy
2 ProGlides or ProStyles
Pure suture-based VCD strategy after TF-TAVI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major or minor vascular and access-site-related complications or need for additional interventional or surgical procedures related to vascular hemostasis.
Time Frame: In-hospital, in average three days
The primary outcome measure is a combination of major or minor vascular and access-site-related complications or need for additional interventional (e.g. covered stent implantation) or surgical procedures related to vascular hemostasis according to updated VARC-3 criteria.
In-hospital, in average three days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major or minor vascular and access-site-related complications after TF-TAVI.
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
Combination of major or minor vascular and access-site-related complications after TF-TAVI according to VARC-3 criteria.
At 30-day follow-up
Individual components of the primary endpoint, namely 1) major or minor vascular and access-site-related complications, 2) need for additional interventional or surgical procedures related to vascular hemostasis.
Time Frame: In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Individual components of the primary endpoint according to VARC-3 criteria.
In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Unplanned use of endovascular stent and/or vascular surgery or other endovascular interventions at the puncture site.
Time Frame: In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Unplanned use of endovascular stent (e.g. covered stent) and/or vascular surgery or other endovascular interventions at the puncture site.
In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Any bleedings.
Time Frame: In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Any type of bleedings according to VARC-3 criteria.
In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Need for blood transfusions.
Time Frame: In-hospital (in average three days)
Need for blood transfusions for vascular access-site-related bleedings or vascular complications.
In-hospital (in average three days)
Percent diameter stenosis of vascular access vessel.
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Percent diameter stenosis of vascular access vessel on post-procedural angiography.
Intra-procedural
All-cause mortality.
Time Frame: In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
All-cause mortality according to VARC-3 criteria.
In-hospital (in average three days) and at 30-day follow-up
Length of post-procedural hospital stay.
Time Frame: In-hospital (in average three days)
Length of post-procedural hospital stay (days).
In-hospital (in average three days)
Time from VCD application to complete hemostasis.
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Time from VCD application to complete hemostasis (seconds).
Intra-procedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Joner, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum München
  • Principal Investigator: Tobias Rheude, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Subscribe