Examination of Pain in Individuals With Non-Specific Lack Pain

October 5, 2023 updated by: Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Investigation of the Relationship Between Pain, and Balance, Proprioception in the Knee, the Strength of the Erector Spinae and Multifidus Muscles in Individuals With Non-Specific Low Back Pain

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between pain, and balance, proprioception sensation in the knee, erector spinae and multifidus muscle strength in individuals with non-specific low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Impaired postural control in people with non-specific low back pain; It can be affected by many factors such as pain, musculoskeletal disorders, proprioception. Postural control is important for the continuation of activities of daily living. Postural control is decreased in patients with non-specific low back pain. According to the proprioception examinations, patients with low back pain are more impaired than healthy individuals. Impaired proprioception can also reduce the ability to maintain posture, balance control and increase the load on the spine. Thus, individuals with low back pain may become more vulnerable to injuries. Weakness of the abdominal muscles and superficial trunk muscles are also risk factors for low back pain.

Weakness and fatigue may occur as a result of structural changes, which are more common in the paraspinal muscles and the multifidus muscle. This can lead to deterioration of lumbar stability. Because these muscles have an important place in providing stability.

Proprioceptive information from the hip, knee and ankle and coordination of the joints are important in maintaining and controlling balance. Regional receptors in muscles, joints, skin and tendons and proprioception in the knee joint provide the necessary joint activity and stabilization. With the decrease in balance and proprioception, pain may occur, and we may encounter a decrease in muscle strength as a result of leading a sedentary life. In this case, since the proper posture, muscle activity and balance required for coordinated movement are negatively affected, the movement is impaired. Because these activities must be performed in the correct order for the movement to occur.

In the literature, there are studies on the relationship of low back pain with muscle strength, balance and proprioception; however, the lack of sufficient studies investigating the relationship between balance and proprioception in the knee in individuals with non-specific low back pain suggests that the study to be conducted will make an important contribution to the literature and reveals the importance of our study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with non-specific low back pain.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having pain intensity of 3 or more according to VAS.
  • Having a mini mental test score of 24 and above
  • Being able to stand on one leg.
  • Having low back pain for 3 months or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoporosis
  • Being in the 0%-20% range on the Oswestry scale
  • Pregnancy
  • Being on constant painkillers for one reason or another
  • Having undergone lumbar, hip, knee and ankle surgery.
  • Having severe hearing, vision, speech impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of pain
Time Frame: Baseline
This was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). According to VAS, in the severity of pain; Generally, '0' means no pain, and '10' means the worst pain imaginable.
Baseline
Evaluation of static stance on one leg
Time Frame: Baseline
This was evaluated with Prokin TecnoBody isokinetic balance 2 device. After the torso sensor was attached, the patient was placed in the dominant side position on one foot and the static balance test measurement was started. The patient is expected to stand in this position for 30 seconds.The test was started by pressing the start button on the computer keyboard connected to the device. The test was automatically terminated by the computer when it expired. A computer printout containing the static test evaluation results was obtained.
Baseline
Evaluation of back extensor strengths
Time Frame: Baseline
These were evaluated with EMG. In the study, measurement of erector spina and multifidus muscles was performed. Measurements were performed with electrodes placed on the skin surface to measure the total activity of the muscles and to determine muscle fatigue non-invasively.
Baseline
Evaluation of low back pain thresholds
Time Frame: Baseline
This was evaluated with Algometer. Determination of pressure perception and pain threshold of sensitivity to pain was determined and recorded with an algometer. It was standardized to perform the measurements on the determined -region-. The details of the application were explained to the participant, and it was emphasized that the pressure sensation he felt caused pain and that he needed to give a 'stop' command. It was stopped with the command received from the patient and the response on the algometer screen was recorded.
Baseline
Evaluation of the effect of pain on functionality
Time Frame: Baseline
It is a scale used to evaluate the extent to which low back pain experienced by patients affects their functions in daily life. Evaluated functions; work and school activities, home activities, wearing shoes or socks, bending forward, lifting an object from the ground, habits, sleeping, walking, sitting, climbing stairs, standing and driving. This questionnaire consists of 12 questions. Each item has a score in the range of 0 - 5 points. The minimum possible score is "0", and the maximum possible score is "60". 60 points; states that the activities in the questionnaire were not difficult.
Baseline
Evaluation of the level of functional disability
Time Frame: Baseline
It is a scale used to determine the level of functional disability due to low back pain. This scale consists of ten questions. Each question has a score between zero and five. In this questionnaire, the severity of pain, social life, lifting, walking, personal care, sitting, sleeping, standing, traveling, the level of pain and the degree of change in pain are questioned.
Baseline
Evaluation of the proprioception
Time Frame: Baseline
The sense of proprioception was evaluated by using the joint range of motion measurement of the universal goniometer. The subjects were asked to lie on the stretcher in the prone position to measure the range of motion of the knee joint. The pivot point of the goniometer was determined as the lateral knee joint condyle and placed. The fixed arm of the goniometer was fixed in parallel at the level of the trochanter major, and the movable arm was positioned at the level of the head of the fibula and the lateral malleolus. First of all, the knee joint is started from 0° extension position and brought to the angle desired by the physiotherapist and the value in the goniometer is recorded. Then, the patient is asked to bring the knee joint, which is again in 0° extension, to the angle brought by the physiotherapist. By following the knee joint flexion of the movable arm, the angle that the patient brings the knee joint is recorded.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Esra Pehlivan, Assoc. Prof., Saglik Bilimleri University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12/37

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS),

Subscribe