Neuromodulation for Children With Cystic Fibrosis Experiencing Chronic Abdominal Pain

August 7, 2024 updated by: Dhiren Patel, MD, St. Louis University

Neuromodulation With Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation for Children With Cystic Fibrosis Experiencing Chronic Abdominal Pain

Chronic abdominal pain is extremely common in individuals with Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Therapy for chronic abdominal pain is very limited and generally consists of osmotic laxatives or drugs that are used to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), most of which are off-label and not proven to be effective for CF patients. Abdominal pain negatively impacts the quality of life (QOL). With the development of novel therapies for CF, life expectancy has significantly increased. There is, therefore, a critical need to identify treatment pathways for chronic abdominal pain in children with CF.

In humans, abdominal pain is modulated by the vagus nerve. Stimulation of the vagus nerve has been suggested to reduce visceral sensitivity and abdominal pain. IB-stim is the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENS) device. It is a non-invasive, outpatient therapy. PENFS has been shown to be efficacious in pediatric patients with abdominal pain. The FDA has cleared and classified this device as class II, suggesting minimal to moderate risk.

There is increasing evidence of intestinal inflammation in patients with CF, which could help explain the GI symptoms and differentiate from IBS. Studies have reported increased inflammation in the intestines using fecal calprotectin.

With the implementation of this study, investigators hypothesize that the IB -Stim device will reduce their overall GI inflammation and abdominal pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104
        • Saint Louis University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking and willing to consent and follow the study protocol
  • Children with CF aged 11-17 years at the time of enrollment. All races, ethnic groups and both sexes will be included. Patient turning 18 years after enrollment in the study will continue in study and complete remaining study visits.
  • Minimum of 2 days of abdominal pain/week for a duration of two months or greater prior to starting the study
  • Average weekly abdominal pain score of at least 3 for the previous 2 weeks prior to entering the study (on a 0-10-point rating scale).
  • Abdominal pain is not explained by any major organic etiology and comprehensive work up failed to identify any single cause for patients' symptoms

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Patients age of 18 years and over, or less than 11 years at the time of enrollment
  • Patients who cannot provide informed consent or do not speak English
  • Patients with abdominal pain that can be explained clinically by other GI diagnoses other than CF per study doctor's judgement
  • History of cranial nerve or major abdominal surgeries in last 6 months
  • Patients with underlying neurologic conditions, including history of ongoing seizures or traumatic brain injury within last 6 months
  • Patients with dermatologic conditions affecting the ears (i.e. psoriasis), or with cuts or abrasions to the external ear that would interfere with electrode placement
  • Patients with hemophilia or other bleeding disorders
  • Patients with any implanted electromagnetic device
  • Inability to comply with study protocol and follow up, per study doctor's judgement.
  • Pregnant females, females who are breastfeeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use effective measures (chosen in consultation with their health care provider) to avoid becoming pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patient open label intervention arm
In humans, abdominal pain is modulated by the vagus nerve. Stimulation of the vagus nerve has been suggested to reduce visceral sensitivity and abdominal pain. IB-stim is the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENS) device. It is a non-invasive, outpatient therapy. PENFS has been shown to be efficacious in pediatric patients with abdominal pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IBS Severity Scoring System-Change Between Baseline and Week 8 is Reported.
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
IBS-SSS is a tool for assessing IBS. Please refer to the following for further understanding of this tool. It records Part 1- Severity Score( 0-500 where 0 is no symptom and 500 is the severe symptoms) and Part 2 ' Other IBS Data' under which includes bowel habits, consistency of bowel movements, red flag symptoms, site of pain and absence from work due to IBS. We cannot use part 2 because it does not have assigned scoring system and as such not suitable for patients with CF due to know genetic mutation in CF causing many similar symptoms of IBS. It has nine stem q: five questions ( in Part 1) have scores of between 0 and 100 for each question, based on visual analogue scales, each minimum of 0 to max of 100.We report combined sub score at baseline and week 8. A score below 75 is seen in healthy people or in remission of IBS, 75-175 indicates mild disease, 175-300 moderate disease and over 300 severe. The score is interpreted as an absolute change from the baseline and at week 8.
baseline and 8 weeks
CFQ-R and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Scale Score in Response to IB-Stim Treatment- Baseline and Week 8 Reported
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks

Name of categories/domains CFQ-R:

9 Quality of life domains: Physical, role/school, vitality, emotion, social, body image, eating, treatment burden, health perceptions.

3 symptom scales: Weight, respiratory, and digestion. Scaling of items: 5 distinct 4-point Likert scales (e.g., always/often/ sometime/never)

Scoring: Range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.

PedsQL consists of 74 items comprising 14 dimensions Likert scale from 0 to 4.Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0.Total Score: Sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales. PedsQL scoring interpretation: In general, the higher scores indicating better health for this measure.

Baseline and week 8 reported

baseline and 8 weeks
Reduction in Stool Calprotectin Inflammatory Markers in Response to IB-Stim-change Between Two Time Point is Reported.
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4
Investigators hypothesize that at 4 weeks following PENFS treatment initiation, there will be a reduction in stool calprotectin to baseline. The higher the value, worse the disease. The value above 200 ug/mg is considered to be suggestive of significant inflammation in the gut.
Baseline and week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Unsure about the number of participants and their willingness to allow us to share the data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Use of neurostimulation device

Subscribe