- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05527756
Evaluation of the Cosmetic Outcomes of Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery (SCARMICS)
March 5, 2024 updated by: Jessa Hospital
Totally endoscopic cardiac surgery (TECS) is considered to have aesthetic advantages over conventional median sternotomy due to the smaller incisions.
Most research regarding TECS focuses on clinical outcomes instead of cosmetic consequences.
Following surgery, postoperative scarring is unavoidable and may negatively affect the patient's physical and emotional well-being.
Therefore, this study aims to investigate the cosmesis after TECS.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Totally endoscopic cardiac surgery (TECS) is considered to have aesthetic advantages over conventional median sternotomy due to the smaller incisions.
Most research regarding TECS focuses on clinical outcomes instead of cosmetic consequences.
Following surgery, postoperative scarring is unavoidable and may negatively affect the patient's physical and emotional well-being.
One previous study compared median sternotomy cardiac surgery and TECS in terms of the long-term cosmetic appearance of postoperative scars.
They concluded that scars were considered more satisfactory, less painful, and itchy in the TECS group in the Chinese population.
To our knowledge, this is the only study published regarding cosmetic consequences after TECS.
Therefore, this study aims to investigate the cosmesis after TECS.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
80
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium
- Jessa Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
All patients that undergo totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (TEAVR), totally endoscopic mitral valve (MVATS) and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (Endo-CABG) at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of the Jessa Hospital, Hasselt will be screened for eligibility.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients older than 18 years old
- Patients who can give their informed consent
- Patients who speak Dutch or French
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that previously underwent cardiac surgery
- Patients that will undergo a combination of cardiac surgeries
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Totally endoscopic aortic/mitral valve replacement
Study procedures include the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale and numerical rating scale (NRS) questionnaire at one, 14 and 30 days after totally endoscopic aortic/mitral valve replacement.
Additionally, a photo of the incisions will be taken at these time points.
|
The SCAR scale consists of two simple questions about symptoms (itch and pain) with yes/no response options that are responded to by the patient and six clinician-related items that are rated by observers through photos of the incisions.
This scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms
The NRS scale, in which the patients score the cosmetic appearance of the scar from 0 to 10, is questioned.
|
Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting
Study procedures include the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale and numerical rating scale (NRS) questionnaire at one, 14 and 30 days after totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.
Additionally, a photo of the incisions will be taken at these time points.
|
The SCAR scale consists of two simple questions about symptoms (itch and pain) with yes/no response options that are responded to by the patient and six clinician-related items that are rated by observers through photos of the incisions.
This scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms
The NRS scale, in which the patients score the cosmetic appearance of the scar from 0 to 10, is questioned.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate the cosmesis through the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale at postoperative day one.
Time Frame: Postoperative day one
|
The SCAR scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms.
A low score corresponds to a good scar cosmesis and a high score to a bad scar cosmesis.
|
Postoperative day one
|
Evaluate the cosmesis through the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale at postoperative day 14.
Time Frame: Postoperative day 14
|
The SCAR scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms.
A low score corresponds to a good scar cosmesis and a high score to a bad scar cosmesis.
|
Postoperative day 14
|
Evaluate the cosmesis through the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale at postoperative day 30.
Time Frame: Postoperative day 30
|
The SCAR scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms.
A low score corresponds to a good scar cosmesis and a high score to a bad scar cosmesis.
|
Postoperative day 30
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cosmetic assessment from the patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS) at postoperative day one.
Time Frame: Postoperative day one
|
The cosmetic appearance of the scar is scored from 0 to 10, whereas 0 contributes to not satisfied with the scar and 10 with very satisfied with the scar.
|
Postoperative day one
|
Cosmetic assessment from the patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS) at postoperative day 14.
Time Frame: Postoperative day 14
|
The cosmetic appearance of the scar is scored from 0 to 10, whereas 0 contributes to not satisfied with the scar and 10 with very satisfied with the scar.
|
Postoperative day 14
|
Cosmetic assessment from the patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS) at postoperative day 30.
Time Frame: Postoperative day 30
|
The cosmetic appearance of the scar is scored from 0 to 10, whereas 0 contributes to not satisfied with the scar and 10 with very satisfied with the scar.
|
Postoperative day 30
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Alaaddin Yilmaz, MD, Jessa Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 21, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 27, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
May 27, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 2, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
September 6, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 5, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- f/2022/121
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Scar
-
University of California, DavisCompletedLinear Scar | Zigzag ScarUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompleted
-
Capstone TherapeuticsCompletedScar Prevention | Scar ReductionUnited States
-
Medstar Health Research InstituteActive, not recruitingBurn Scar | Scar | Skin Graft ScarUnited States
-
Iran University of Medical SciencesRecruitingDry Needling | Scar Tissue | Hypertrophic Scar | Hypertrophic Surgical Scar | Hypertrophic Scar of Upper Arm (Disorder)United States, Iran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of PittsburghUnited States Department of DefenseTerminatedBurn Scar | Restrictive Scar Contracture | Restrictive Hypertrophic Scar | Burn Scar ContracturesUnited States
-
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of FoshanWithdrawn
-
Lumenis Be Ltd.Terminated
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of FoshanWithdrawn
Clinical Trials on Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale
-
Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital...Not yet recruitingBreast Cancer | Upper Extremity Dysfunction | Tissue AdhesionTurkey
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedScar Tissue or Healthy SkinBelgium
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruiting
-
Zagazig UniversityRecruitingCesarean Scar NicheEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
University Hospital, GhentBelgian Foundation for Burn Injuries, BelgiumCompleted
-
Prof. Dr. Matthis SynofzikRecruitingAtaxiaGermany, Italy, Australia, Brazil, France, New Zealand, Turkey
-
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.Completed
-
New York Institute of TechnologyTerminatedProprioceptive Disorders | Cognitive DeficitsUnited States
-
University of FloridaCompletedEssential Tremor | Parkinsons DiseaseUnited States