Percutaneous Coronary RevascularizatiOn VERsus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivessel Disease in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction (PROVERB) (PROVERB)

March 20, 2023 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A short description, 5000 characters Ischemic cardiomyopathy related to coronary artery disease is currently the leading cause of heart failure. When it is responsible for heart failure, the coronary artery disease likely involves 2 or 3 vessels. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty, which is the other available technique for coronary revascularization, has never been evaluated in this indication. The results of retrospective registries studying the strategy for multivessel revascularization in patients with heart failure are inconsistent and no randomized study has been performed so far. Currently, ESC guidelines recommends to perform coronary-artery bypass grafting (IB) or percutaneous coronary intervention (IIa C) with the acknowledgement that percutaneous coronary intervention has never been properly evaluated in this setting. However, it has been previously demonstrated that left ventricle dysfunction significantly increases mortality and morbidity during and after cardiac surgery (3-10% mortality when LVEF is ≤30%). Moreover, the technical progresses in stent development and manufacturing have led to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. Therefore, we hypothesize that percutaneous coronary angioplasty may be an attractive strategy for revascularization in patients with multi-vessel disease and left ventricle dysfunction, who are at high risk of surgical complication. Thus, we aim to test the hypothesis that percutaneous coronary intervention is non-inferior to coronary-artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with multivessel disease and left ventricle dysfunction.

The main objective is to demonstrate that percutaneous coronary angioplasty is non-inferior to coronary-artery bypass grafting for multivessel revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction on major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

Method:A Prospective Randomized Open label, Blinded Endpoint, parallel-group, active controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients meeting the selection criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Patients will be randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent or coronary-artery bypass grafting.

Whichever technique the patient is randomized to, revascularization will aim to be complete and both techniques will be performed following current guidelines and local practices. No myocardial viability assessment will be mandatory prior to inclusion. Both revascularization strategy will be associated with optimal medical therapy for heart failure.

Follow-up will be performed at 3, 12, 24, 36 and for patients enrolled in the trial early in the inclusion period, also at 48 months, and for all patients at the end of the study (3 years after inclusion of the last patient).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1040

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Val De Marne
      • Créteil, Val De Marne, France, 94000
        • Recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - CHU HENRI MONDOR
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Left ventricle ejection fraction ≤35% measured by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ventriculogram or gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography ventriculogram
  • Multivessel disease suitable for revascularization:

    • Three vessel disease
    • Two vessel disease involving left main or proximal left anterior descending artery
  • Clinical and anatomic eligibility for both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as agreed to by the local Heart Team (interventionalist determines PCI appropriateness and eligibility; cardiac surgeon determines surgical appropriateness and eligibility)
  • Ability to sign informed consent and comply with all study procedures, including follow-up for at least two years
  • Affiliation to health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior:

    • PCI of any coronary artery lesions within 6 months prior to randomization
    • CABG at any time prior to randomization
  • Ongoing cardiogenic shock at the time of coronary angiogram (SBP< 90 mmHg with clinical signs of low output or patients requiring inotropic agents)
  • Contra indication for PCI or CABG determined by the heart team
  • Indication for another cardiac surgery (i.e. valvular surgery, aortic repair…) if CABG is performed
  • ST elevation myocardial infarction < 30 days
  • Non-cardiac illness with a life expectancy of less than 24 months
  • Current participation in other investigational drug or device studies
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing
  • Females of childbearing potential without effective method of birth control
  • Patients who are under tutorship or curatorship
  • Patient on AME (state medical aid)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Angioplasty
percutaneous coronary angioplasty with drug eluting stent implantation.
The studied intervention will be percutaneous coronary angioplasty with drug eluting stent implantation. Percutaneous coronary intervention may be performed during one single procedure or during staged procedures. The decision will be left at the investigator choice. PCI will be performed using drug eluting stent exclusively. The techniques for bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusion angioplasty will be left at the operator choice. The choice of the drug eluting stent used will be left at the operator's choice. Anti-platelet therapy will be given to all patients randomized to PCI. The choice of the anti-thrombotic regiment and its duration will be left at the investigator choice (after assessment of initial presentation, bleeding and ischemic risks) but will have to comply with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Active Comparator: Coronary artery bypass grafting
Coronary artery bypass grafting has been chosen as the comparator because it is currently the reference strategy for revascularization in patients with multi-vessel disease and heart failure (ESC guidelines). Coronary artery bypass grafting technique will be total arterial revascularization unless internal mammary grafts are unavailable or have inadequate flow. All patients will be treated with anti-thrombotic therapy according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Coronary artery bypass grafting technique will be total arterial revascularization unless internal mammary grafts are unavailable or have inadequate flow. All patients will be treated with anti-thrombotic therapy according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACE
Time Frame: 3 years
Comparison of MACE between PCI and CABG. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) is a composite of death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure or urgent revascularization.
3 years
MACE
Time Frame: 4 years
Comparison of MACE between PCI and CABG.major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) is a composite of death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure or urgent revascularization.
4 years
MACE
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparison of MACE between PCI and CABG. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) is a composite of death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure or urgent revascularization.
2 years
MACE
Time Frame: 1 year
major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) is a composite of death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure or urgent revascularization.
1 year
MACE
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparison of MACE between PCI and CABG
3 months
MACCE
Time Frame: an average of 54 months
The composite outcome of death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure or urgent revascularization or ischemia driven revascularization at the end of follow-up
an average of 54 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: an average of 54 months
Death from any cause at the end of follow-up
an average of 54 months
Stroke
Time Frame: an average of 54 months
Stroke at the end of follow-up
an average of 54 months
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: assessed up to 54 months
Myocardial Infarction at the end of follow-up
assessed up to 54 months
Unplanned hospitalization
Time Frame: an average of 54 months
Unplanned hospitalization at the end of follow-up
an average of 54 months
Ischemia driven revascularization
Time Frame: an average of 54 months
Ischemia driven revascularization at the end of follow-up
an average of 54 months
Left ventricle ejection fraction
Time Frame: 1 year
Left ventricle ejection fraction measure by echocardiography at 1 year
1 year
Heart Failure Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Health Related Quality of life at 1 year
1 year
Treatment Burden Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Treatment burden at 1 year (assessed using the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ))
1 year
Economic evaluation
Time Frame: an average of 54 months
Economic evaluation incremental Cost-utility and cost effectiveness ratios
an average of 54 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Akim SOUAG, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris- CHU Henri-Mondor
  • Principal Investigator: Romain GALLET, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris- CHU Henri-Mondor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 16, 2030

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 16, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous coronary intervention

Subscribe