- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05539794
Exercise and Lifestyle in Adolescent Cancer (HEALTHYADOL) (HEALTHYADOL)
Exercise and Lifestyle Intervention for Patients With Adolescent Cancer: a Randomised Controlled Trial (HEALTHY ADOL)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background. Health promotion interventions are needed during adolescent cancer treatment to facilitate the acquisition of good health practices as patients transition to survivorship. Although meta-analytical evidence supports the health benefits of exercise in the context of childhood cancer, there is scant data focusing solely on adolescents.
Hypothesis and objectives. The investigators hypothesise that an inhospital exercise intervention combined with lifestyle counselling during treatment for adolescent cancer will provide several health benefits, particularly related to the cardiometabolic profile. Thus, the investigators will study the effects of an inhospital exercise intervention combined with lifestyle--including diet--counselling along the duration of treatment (neoadjuvant [solid tumours]/intense chemotherapy [leukaemias], expected median duration 5-6 months) on several health-related variables.
Setting and Methods. Participants will be recruited from 3 hospitals in Madrid (Spain). Inclusion criteria: male/female aged 12-19 years, newly diagnosed with a malignant extracranial tumour; not having received any type of therapy--except surgery--at the time of diagnosis; adequate health status (Karnofsky/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale score ≥50/2); to understand Spanish language and to provide written informed consent. The investigators will recruit ≥136 participants and conduct a randomised controlled trial (1:1 ratio randomisation with a block on gender and tumour type [leukaemias/lymphomas]). In addition to usual care, the control group will be informed of the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. The intervention group will follow a physical exercise and lifestyle counselling program. The exercise intervention will be performed in the hospital gymnasium (3 sessions/week of aerobic and resistance exercises), except for neutropenic phases--during which time sessions will be performed in the patients' ward--and will also include inspiratory muscle training (5 days/week). Health counselling will include a psychological intervention (1 session/week) based on motivational interviewing techniques, guidance by a nutritionist (2 sessions/month), and support sessions (1/month) with survivors (≥5-year survivorship) who will share their experiences with the study participants. The following outcomes will be assessed at baseline (diagnosis), end of treatment, and at 3-month follow-up in all participants: echocardiographydetermined left ventricular function (primary outcome); and blood pressure, blood lipids, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-determined body composition (fat [including visceral adipose tissue]/lean mass, bone mineral content/density), accelerometry-determined physical activity, dietary recall determined energy intake, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, functional mobility, health-related quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, stress coping, anxiety, depression, clinical variables (survival, treatment tolerability, hospitalisation length, infections), and potential biological underpinnings of exercise multisystemic benefits (metabolic [glucose homeostasis indicators, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein] and inflammatory [cytokine panel] markers, plasma proteome, gut microbiome, and immune function [lymphocyte subpopulations, natural killer cell cytotoxicity]) (secondary outcomes).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Alejandro Lucia
- Phone Number: +34661393101
- Email: alejandro.lucia@universidadeuropea.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain
- Recruiting
- UEM
-
Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain, 28670
- Recruiting
- Universidad Europea de Madrid
-
Contact:
- Phone Number: +34661393101
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Newly diagnosed with a malignant extracranial tumour
- Not having received any therapy--except surgery--at diagnosis
- Adequate health status (Karnofsky/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale score ≥50/2)
- To understand Spanish language and provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy <3 months
- Comorbidity/acute condition contraindicating exercise practice
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control
Standard care
|
|
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention group will follow a physical exercise and lifestyle counselling program.
|
the intervention group will follow a physical exercise and health counselling intervention--see below. The exercise program will be performed in the hospital gymnasium (3 supervised sessions/week of aerobic and muscle strength exercises) or in the patients' room (during phases of treatment-induced immunodepression, where isolation is needed to prevent infections). It will also include specific training of the respiratory ('inspiratory') muscles (e.g., diaphragm) on 5 days/week. The counselling program will include psychological (once weekly), nutritional (twice monthly), support (with survivors of adolescent cancer, twice/month) and educational (for relatives/caregivers, once monthly) sessions. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in left-ventricular (LV) function.(LV ejection fraction) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Echocardiography-determined LV ejection fraction (unit = %)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in left-ventricular (LV) function (LV ejection fraction) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Echocardiography-determined LV ejection fraction (unit = %)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in left-ventricular (LV) function (LV fractional shortening) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)]
|
Echocardiography-determined LV fractional shortening (unit = %)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)]
|
Change in left-ventricular (LV) function (LV fractional shortening) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)]
|
Echocardiography-determined LV fractional shortening (unit = %)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)]
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in resting 'clinic' arterial blood pressure from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Arterial blood pressure (BP) (ausculatory method) (units = mmHg)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in resting 'clinic' arterial blood pressure from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Arterial blood pressure (BP) (ausculatory method) (units = mmHg)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in serum lipid profile (cholesterol) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis)]
|
Total/HDL/LDL-cholesterol will be quantified with an automated chemistry analyser (units = mg/dL).
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis)]
|
Change in serum lipid profile (cholesterol) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)]
|
Total/HDL/LDL-cholesterol will be quantified with an automated chemistry analyser (units = mg/dL).
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)]
|
Change in serum lipid profile (triglycerides) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis)]
|
Tiglycerides will be quantified with an automated chemistry analyser (units = mg/dL).
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis)]
|
Change in serum lipid profile (triglycerides) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)]
|
Tiglycerides will be quantified with an automated chemistry analyser (units = mg/dL).
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)]
|
Change in adiposity index from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Waist-to-hip ratio (no units)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in adiposity index from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Waist-to-hip ratio (no units)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in DXA measures of lean mass from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
DXA-determined total lean mass (grams)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in DXA measures of lean mass from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
DXA-determined total lean and fat mass (grams)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in DXA measures of fat mass from baseline to end of tratment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
DXA-determined total fat mass (grams)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in DXA measures of fat mass from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
DXA-determined total fat mass (grams)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in DXA measure of bone health from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
DXA-determined bone mineral density (unit = g/m2)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in DXA measure of bone health from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
DXA-determined bone mineral density (unit = g/m2)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in physical activity (PA) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
PA levels (moderate/vigorous PA) determined using triaxial accelerometry (units =minutes/week)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in physical activity (PA) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
PA levels (moderate/vigorous PA) determined using triaxial accelerometry (units = minutes/week)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in total energy intake from baseline to end of treatment.
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
3-day 24 h-dietary recalls to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. 3-day, 24 h-dietary recalls will be used to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. The investigators will provide participants with instructions on how to obtain a correct food record. Dietary recall data will be analysed using Dietsource 3.0 (Novartis) to determine total energy intake (kcal) |
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in total energy intake from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
3-day 24 h-dietary recalls to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. 3-day, 24 h-dietary recalls will be used to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. The investigators will provide participants with instructions on how to obtain a correct food record. Dietary recall data will be analysed using Dietsource 3.0 (Novartis) to determine total energy intake (kcal) |
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in energy intake by sustrate from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
3-day 24 h-dietary recalls to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. 3-day, 24 h-dietary recalls will be used to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. The participants will provide participants with instructions on how to obtain a correct food record. Dietary recall data will be analysed using Dietsource 3.0 (Novartis) to determine protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber intake (g/day) |
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in energy intake by sustrate from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
3-day 24 h-dietary recalls to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. 3-day, 24 h-dietary recalls will be used to record the participants' energy intake by either themselves or parents/caregivers. The participants will provide participants with instructions on how to obtain a correct food record. Dietary recall data will be analysed using Dietsource 3.0 (Novartis) to determine protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber intake (g/day) |
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
VO2peak will be determined with 'breath-by breath' analysis of expired gases on a metabolic cart using a ramp-like treadmill--or arm-crank ergometer--test (units = mL/kg/min)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
VO2peak will be determined with 'breath-by breath' analysis of expired gases on a metabolic cart using a ramp-like treadmill--or arm-crank ergometer--test (units = mL/kg/min)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in muscle strength from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
The 5-repetition maximum (commonly abbreviated as 5RM), which is the maximum strength capacity to perform 5 repetitions until momentary muscular exhaustion, will be measured for leg press and bench press (units = kg).
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in muscle strength from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis);and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
The 5-repetition maximum (commonly abbreviated as 5RM), which is the maximum strength capacity to perform 5 repetitions until momentary muscular exhaustion, will be measured for leg press and bench press (units = kg).
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis);and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in inspiratory muscle strength (PImax) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
PImax (units = cmH20) will be determined using a mouth pressure meter with the best result from 3 attempts (interspersed with rest periods of ≥1 min-duration) taken.
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in inspiratory muscle strength (PImax) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at three time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
PImax (units = cmH20) will be determined using a mouth pressure meter with the best result from 3 attempts (interspersed with rest periods of ≥1 min-duration) taken.
|
Assessed at three time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in psychological status (quality of life) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Health-related QoL (HRQoL) (Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL] 3.0 Cancer Module, designed to measure paediatric/adolescent cancer specific HRQoL) (0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in psychological status (quality of life) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Health-related QoL (HRQoL) (Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory [abbreviated as PedsQL] 3.0 Cancer Module, designed to measure paediatric/adolescent cancer specific HRQoL) (0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in psychological status (fatigue) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Cancer-related fatigue (Paediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Multidimensional Fatigue Scale) (0 to 100 score, higher scores meaning higher fatigue)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in psychological status (fatigue) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Cancer-related fatigue (Paediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Multidimensional Fatigue Scale) (0 to 100 score, higher scores meaning higher fatigue
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in psychological status (stress) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Stress coping (General form of the Adolescent Coping Scale) (0 to 20 scale, with higher scores indicating higher resilience to stress)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in psychological status (stress) from baseline to follow-ip
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Stress coping (General form of the Adolescent Coping Scale) (0 to 20 scale, with higher scores indicating higher resilience to stress)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in psychological status (anxiety) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Anxiety (six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [abbbreviated as STAI]) (0 to 100 score, with higher scores reflecting higher anxiety levels)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in psychological status (anxiety) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Anxiety (six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [abbreviated as STAI]) (0 to 100 score, with higher scores reflecting higher anxiety levels)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment); and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in psychological status (depression) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Depression (Child Depression Scale) (0 to 52 scale, with higher scores reflecting more depression)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in psychological status (depression) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Depression (Child Depression Scale) (0 to 52 scale, with higher scores reflecting more depression)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in clinical variables (survival) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Survival (numebr of days from diagnosis to the end of the study or death)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in clinical variables (survival) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Survival (number of days from diagnosis to the end of the study or death)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Changes in clinical variables (treatment tolerability) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Treatment tolerability (number of days of treatment interruption/delay
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Changes in clinical variables (treatment tolerability) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Treatment tolerability (number of days of treatment interruption/delay
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in clinical variables (days of hospitalization) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Total hospitalisation length (number of days)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in clinical variables (days of hospitalization) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Total hospitalisation length (number of days)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in clinical variables (global score of Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE, global score, 1 (low toxicity) to 5 (highest])
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in clinical variables (global score of Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE, global score, 1 (low toxicity) to 5 (highest])
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in metabolic markers (glucose) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Serum fasting glycaemia (mg/dL)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in metabolic markers (glucose) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Serum fasting glycaemia (mg/dL)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Metabolic markers (insulin) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Serum fasting insulinaemia (pmol/L)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Metabolic markers (insulin) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Serum fasting insulinaemia (pmol/L)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in metabolic markers (HOMA-IR) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) (molar units)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in metabolic markers (HOMA-IR) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) (molar units)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in inflammation (C-reactive protein) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in metabolic markers (C-reactive protein) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in inflammatory markers (cytokines/chemokines) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Panel of 21 cytokines/chemokines measured in serum using Luminex® (all assessed in the same units, micrograms/dL)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in inflammatory markers (cytokines/chemokines) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (i.e., follow-up)
|
Panel of 21 cytokines/chemokines measured in serum using Luminex® (all assessed in the same units, micrograms/dL)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (i.e., follow-up)
|
Change in plasma proteome from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
The investigators will use liquid chromatography coupled to tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to measure levels in blood of thousands of proteins
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in plasma proteome from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
The investigators will use liquid chromatography coupled to tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to measure levels in blood of thousands of proteins
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in gut microbiome (alpha-diversity) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
α-diversity
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in gut microbiome (alpha-diversity) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
α-diversity
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in gut microbiome (beta-diversity) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
beta-diversity
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in gut microbiome (beta-diversity) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Beta-diversity
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in gut microbiome (specific bacteria) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Changes in bacteria abundance
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in gut microbiome (specific bacteria) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Changes in bacteria abundance
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in Immune phenotype (lymphocyte subpopulations) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Lymphocyte subpopulations (%)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis
|
Change in Immune phenotype (lymphocyte subpopulations) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Lymphocyte subpopulations (%)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in Immune phenotype (natural killer (NK) cells) from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
NK cell subsets (%)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in Immune phenotype (NK cells) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
NK cell subsets (%)
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Change in Immune function from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
NK cell receptors
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 14 to 28 weeks after diagnosis (i.e., end of treatment)
|
Change in immune function from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
NK cell receptors
|
Assessed at two time points: (1) at baseline (diagnosis); and (2) 3 months after the end of treatment (follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Universidad Europea de Madrid
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Adolescent Cancer
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterCompletedAdolescent Cancer Survivors | Pediatric Cancer SurvivorsUnited States
-
University of UtahNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Massachusetts General Hospital; National Institutes... and other collaboratorsCompletedAdolescent | Cancer | Young AdultUnited States
-
Institut CurieUniversity of Paris 5 - Rene DescartesActive, not recruitingCancer | Adolescent Behavior | Young AdultFrance
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterTerminatedAdolescent and Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaWithdrawnBody Composition | Adolescent Cancer | Cardiometabolic Dysregulation | Young Adult Cancer
-
Duke UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingAdolescent and Young Adult Cancer PatientUnited States
-
University of OttawaCompletedAdolescent and Young Adult Cancer SurvivorsCanada
-
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineActive, not recruitingAdolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer SurvivorsUnited States
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterNot yet recruitingBody Image | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompletedAdolescent | Cancer | Physical Activity | Psychological Distress | Young Adult | Social IsolationUnited States
Clinical Trials on lifestyle and physical exercise
-
University of LimerickRecruiting
-
Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedPolycystic Ovary SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
The New Model of Care, Hail Health ClusterHealth Holding Company, Hail Health Cluster, Saudi ArabiaRecruitingLifestyle-related ConditionSaudi Arabia
-
Jamie JacksonNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)RecruitingHeart Defects, Congenital | Cardiovascular Disease OtherUnited States
-
Hanze UniversityUniversity Medical Center GroningenUnknownPhysical Disability | FragilityNetherlands
-
University of OuluOulu University Hospital; Oulu Deaconess Institute Foundation srCompletedObesity | Physical Activity | Weight Loss | Healthy Obesity, MetabolicallyFinland
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUnknown
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedPregnancy Outcome | Lifestyle | GDMEgypt
-
Centro de Investigacion SanitariaUniversity of Helsinki; International Diabetes FederationCompletedGlucose Metabolism Disorders | Type 2 DiabetesColombia
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompletedChanges in the Hypotalamic-pituitary Region of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity (CHIASM)Metabolic Syndrome | Overweight and ObesityItaly