The IGNITE Study on Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods

February 9, 2026 updated by: Eugenia Garvin, University of Pennsylvania

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods to Address Structural Racism as a Fundamental Cause of Poor Health

Black Americans in the US fare worse across nearly every health indicator compared to White individuals. In Philadelphia, the location of this study, these health disparities culminate in a stark longevity gap, with average life expectancies in poor, predominantly Black neighborhoods being 20 years lower than in nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods. The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a suite of place-based and financial-wellbeing interventions at the community, organization, and individual/household levels that address the social determinants of racial health disparities. At the community level, the investigators address underinvestment in Black neighborhoods by implementing vacant lot greening, abandoned house remediation, tree planting, and trash cleanup. At the organization level, the investigators partner with community-based financial empowerment providers to develop cross-organizational infrastructure to increase reach and maximize efficiency. At the individual/household levels, the investigators increase access to public benefits, financial counseling and tax preparation services, and emergency cash assistance. The investigators will test this "big push" intervention in 60 Black neighborhood microclusters, with a total of 720 adults. The investigators hypothesize that this "big push" intervention will have significant impact on overall health and wellbeing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Black individuals in the United States fare worse than White individuals across almost every social, economic, and health indicator. The Black health disadvantage starts at birth, reflecting the cumulative toll of racialized social stressors and healthcare discrimination on maternal health and resulting in higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight. Black youth are disproportionately exposed to environmental toxins such as lead and adverse childhood events such as financial hardship and neighborhood violence. Black adults have higher rates of chronic disease, including diabetes, hypertension, as well as many cancers. These and other forces culminate in a stark racial longevity gap: in Philadelphia, the location of this study, life expectancy for people living in a poor, predominantly Black neighborhood is 20 years lower than for people living in a nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhood.

The fundamental cause of these striking and pervasive disparities is structural racism - the confluence of deep historical, institutional, cultural, and ideological forces that unequally distribute resources and risks across racialized groups. Structural racism patterns health by affecting a range of interconnected, mutually reinforcing social determinants of health at the national, neighborhood, household, and individual levels. Most notably, longstanding, systematic disinvestment has resulted in highly segregated Black neighborhoods with dilapidated environmental conditions and severe economic insecurity within Black households, leading to a "feedback loop of concentrated racial disadvantage," all of which have been strongly tied to poor health.

Most interventions seeking to address racial health disparities focus on individual-level behaviors and outcomes, or individual channels by which structural racism harms health. However, by failing to address upstream social determinants, these interventions have had limited population level impact. A multi-level, multi-component intervention package focused on a range of social determinants of health is necessary to meaningfully address structural racism as a fundamental cause of racial health disparities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

571

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 00000
        • Philadelphia Neighborhoods

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Have the ability to communicate via text messaging
  • Individuals comfortable communicating in English
  • A permanent resident of the home where they are to be enrolled
  • Have knowledge of their household finances

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who plan to move out of the study microcluster within 6 months
  • Individuals who are unable to fully consent and participate based on recruitment team assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

At the individual level, participants in the intervention arm receive place-based and financial well-being interventions.

These include, at the individual level:

  • Tax preparation
  • Access to public benefits
  • Financial counseling and microgrants

At the neighborhood level:

  • Abandoned house remediation
  • Trash cleanup
  • Vacant lot greening
  • Tree planting
Tax preparation; access to public benefits; financial counseling and microgrants
Vacant lot greening; abandoned house remediation; trash cleanup; and tree planting.
No Intervention: Control
Participants in the control arm will not receive any of the listed interventions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Health Index
Time Frame: 24 months
Composite index using method of Anderson (2008) based on three questions: rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent); rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse); and number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation); (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)
24 months
Psychological Distress
Time Frame: 24 months
Kessler-6 (answers scored 0-24 with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological distress)
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall health
Time Frame: 24 months
Rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent) (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)
24 months
Poor health
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether individual reported either poor or fair health to overall health question (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)
24 months
Change in overall health
Time Frame: 24 months
Rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse)
24 months
Healthy days
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation)
24 months
Sleep duration
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of hours of usual sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)
24 months
Short sleep
Time Frame: 24 months
Less than seven hours of usual night sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)
24 months
Healthcare access
Time Frame: 24 months
Received all needed care in the last 6 months (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)
24 months
Financial well-being
Time Frame: 24 months
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Abbreviated Financial Well-being Survey
24 months
Food insecurity
Time Frame: 24 months
Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement Screener
24 months
Income tax filing
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether or not individual (or someone in household on behalf of individual) filed previous years income tax (yes, planning to file late, no) (internally developed)
24 months
Home ownership
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether or not individual owns house, condo, or mobile home (Add Health)
24 months
Owing on mortgage
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether or not individual has remaining mortgage payments (internally developed)
24 months
Total debt
Time Frame: 24 months
Amount of debt added altogether, not including mortgage (Add Health)
24 months
Participation in public medical benefit programs
Time Frame: 24 months
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare savings, LIS, CHIP, Qualified Health Plans, SelectPlan, other, or none (internally developed)
24 months
Participation in public food benefit programs
Time Frame: 24 months
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in SNAP, WIC, Senior Food Box, other, or none (internally developed)
24 months
Participation in public income support or cash benefit programs
Time Frame: 24 months
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in TANF, LIHEAP, SSI/SSDI, UI, PA General Assistance, PA Emergency Rental Assistance, EITC, CTC Refugee Cash Assistance, CCIS, PA Child Care Tax Credit, other, or none (internally developed)
24 months
Participation in public home ownership benefit programs
Time Frame: 24 months
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in PTRR, Homestead Exemption, LOOP, Basic Systems Repair Program, PA Homeowner Assistance, Philly First Home Program, Philadelphia Home Repair Assistance, other or none (internally developed)
24 months
Frequency of greenspace engagment
Time Frame: 24 months
Frequency with which individual visits a greenspace (such as a park, garden, greened vacant lot, trail, or any other outdoor space with vegetation) (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)
24 months
Time spent in greenspace
Time Frame: 24 months
Time spent in a greenspace on a typical day (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior))
24 months
Reasons for not spending time in greenspace
Time Frame: 24 months
Things that stop an individual from spending time in greenspace (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)
24 months
Perception of tree cover
Time Frame: 24 months
Beliefs about number of trees in the neighborhood (internally developed)
24 months
Tree planting concerns
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether or not individual has concerns about planting more trees in neighborhood (internally developed)
24 months
Perceived tree health benefits
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether or not individual believes trees confer health benefits (e.g., safety, mental health benefits, physical health benefits, social benefits, environmental benefits, aesthetic benefits)
24 months
Perceived stress
Time Frame: 24 months
Perceived Stress Scale (responses scored 0-16 with higher scores correlated to higher stress)
24 months
Time spent in neighborhood
Time Frame: 24 months
Frequency with which individual endorses spending time relaxing, socializing, or hanging out in porches, stoops, and front yards of neighborhoods (adapted from Kahneman et al 2004 Science)
24 months
Neighborhood social capital
Time Frame: 24 months
Neighborhood Social Cohesion & Exchange and Social & Physical Disorder Scale (two domains: Social Cohesion and Physical Disorder. Higher scores for social cohesion indicate higher levels of social cohesion and higher scores for physical disorder indicate higher levels of physical disorder).
24 months
Physical disorder
Time Frame: 24 months
Whether or not participant reports a lot of abandoned buildings in their neighborhood (Ross and Mirowksi)
24 months
Neighborhood crime rates
Time Frame: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete
Overall number of crimes, number of violent crimes, serious crimes, and gun related incidents
Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete
Nuisance calls
Time Frame: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete
Number of 311 calls and number of 311 calls for neighborhood cleanup and remediation-related issues
Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 850178

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health, Subjective

Clinical Trials on Financial Well-being Interventions

Subscribe