Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Versus Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With High-degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (Left Bundle BRAVE)

January 29, 2024 updated by: Main Line Health

Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Versus Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With High-degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • Recruiting
        • Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
        • Contact:
          • Krishna Pothineni, MD
    • New Jersey
      • Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States, 07450
        • Recruiting
        • Valley Health System
        • Contact:
          • Mohammadali Habibi, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
        • Contact:
          • Robert Schaller, DO
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
        • Recruiting
        • Lankenau Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Ali Keramati, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Steven Liskov, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has at least one of these conduction disturbances:

    1. Symptomatic (or hemodynamically significant) bradycardia or symptomatic persistent atrioventricular block including first-degree and Mobitz I (Wenckebach) or Mobitz type II atrioventricular bock
    2. High-grade atrioventricular block
    3. Third-degree atrioventricular block
  • Subject has undergone TAVR (any valve system) in the last four weeks
  • Subject is receiving a first-time pacemaker implant
  • Subject's most recent documented ejection fraction (by any method) within the past 90 days prior to study enrollment is > 50% (≥45% if visually estimated at the time of enrollment)
  • Subject is a male or female at least 18 years old at the time of consent
  • Subject is able to receive a left sided pectoral implant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has ever had a previous or has an existing implantable pulse generator (IPG), implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) or biventricular (BiV) implant
  • Subject has more than mild para-valvular regurgitation following TAVR implantation.
  • Subject has LVEF < 45% if visually estimated at the time of enrollment
  • Subject is indicated for a biventricular pacing device (CRT-P or CRT-D).
  • Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study that may confound the results of this study
  • Subject has a mechanical heart valve
  • Subject is pregnant, or of childbearing potential and not on a reliable form of birth control
  • Subject status post heart transplant
  • Subject life expectancy less than 2 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.
Experimental: Group B
All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in global longitudinal strain (GLS%)
Time Frame: 9 months
Primary efficacy outcome
9 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%)
Time Frame: 9 months
Primary efficacy outcome
9 months
Composite of left bundle branch area pacing lead septal myocardial or coronary artery perforation, lead dislodgment, and repeat procedures related to left bundle branch area lead implantation
Time Frame: 18 months
Primary safety endpoint
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Adverse events related to device function
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Quality of life measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHQ)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Functional capacity measured using the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Six minute walk test score
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Hospitalizations for heart failure
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS%)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Left ventricular mechanical systolic dyssynchrony indexed to heart rate (SDI)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD)
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Left ventricular stroke volume
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Severity of tricuspid regurgitation
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Severity of mitral regurgitation
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead pacing threshold
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead sensed R wave amplitude
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead impedence
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Brain natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Keramati, MD, Lankenau Heart Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Right ventricular septal pacing followed by left bundle branch area pacing

3
Subscribe